| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-08-05 | |||
| 16:39:54 | jssfr | okay, so 1w before FF | |
| 16:39:55 | jssfr | noted | |
| 16:40:03 | sean-k-mooney | well you have until FF | |
| 16:40:14 | jssfr | oh I thought that was in 4 weeks. | |
| 16:40:26 | Uggla | A bit less than 4 weeks | |
| 16:40:37 | jssfr | right | |
| 16:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | after which it woudl need a backport but its not a regressin intoduced in this cycle so between FF and RC1 we dont fix a lot of latent bugs | |
| 16:40:54 | sean-k-mooney | after rc 1 is cut the branch woudl be reopen for bugfixes again | |
| 16:41:00 | Uggla | FF will be August 28th | |
| 16:41:15 | jssfr | it should be doable to finish it in two weeks, so I'll aim for a submission before or on 2025-08-19 | |
| 16:41:18 | sean-k-mooney | yep that why i said about 3 weeks | |
| 16:41:38 | NicolaiRuckel | I'll continue with rebasing/fixing the UEFI patch in the meantime. | |
| 16:44:45 | sean-k-mooney | i think we can move on if there are other topic unless there are any final objections? | |
| 16:45:24 | jssfr | I'd probably jump out of the meeting then. I'll stay reachable here as usual though if there's any later remarks. Thanks for all the input! | |
| 16:46:15 | Uggla | ok I guess melwitt point was covered ^ | |
| 16:46:33 | Uggla | anything else to discuss ? | |
| 16:47:40 | jssfr | okay, text you all later, thanks! | |
| 16:52:59 | Uggla | As we are almost on the top of the hour, I'll skip bug scrubbing. | |
| 16:53:44 | Uggla | Thanks all, see you next week. | |
| 16:53:50 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-08-05-16.01.log.html | |
| 16:53:50 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-08-05-16.01.txt | |
| 16:53:50 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-08-05-16.01.html | |
| 16:53:50 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 5 16:53:50 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:53:50 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 17:09:06 | cardoe | So I know its after the meeting but I just wanted to bring up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 | |
| 17:31:46 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: i still think that woudl be good to do, in 2026.1 at this point but its still open because of review banding and process | |
| 17:33:37 | cardoe | So Ironic has implemented a patch that grabs the metadata from nova and rewrites it to add that data and then ultimately writes that to disk. | |
| 17:34:42 | sean-k-mooney | that was added for another reason i belive | |
| 17:34:51 | sean-k-mooney | but yes they have some logic for updatign the config drive | |
| 17:35:11 | sean-k-mooney | that for port_groups in general rather then bonding specificly i think | |
| 17:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | or perhaps its for bonding rather then for vlan trunking | |
| 17:35:49 | sean-k-mooney | i vagly recall the patch but not the details | |
| 17:36:36 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/2106073 | |
| 17:37:13 | sean-k-mooney | which which was adress by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/946677 | |
| 17:39:29 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: it looks like they have chosen to use the uuid for the link id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/946677/29/ironic/conductor/configdrive_utils.py#295 | |
| 17:39:39 | sean-k-mooney | even if that may brake some usescases | |
| 17:39:49 | sean-k-mooney | that effecitvly what i was suggesting doing too | |
| 17:40:00 | cardoe | Well I can update the spec as well. | |
| 17:41:08 | sean-k-mooney | ack they have some examples of what it will looklike in tehre unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/946677/29/ironic/tests/unit/conductor/test_configdrive_utils.py#169 | |
| 17:55:07 | cardoe | I'm happy to do whatever you guys would like to see to get it landed. | |
| 17:55:49 | cardoe | I'm merely trying to show users in my company and then at another company (where some former co-workers have gone) that they need to be engaging with upstream instead of downstream patches. | |
| 17:56:14 | cardoe | Which has morphed into me finding that spec and series which is from another company. And the written patches are written by yet another company. | |
| 17:56:59 | cardoe | While my company engages with upstream (hi I'm here) there's other orgs within that don't necessarily. | |
| 17:57:08 | cardoe | Then these other two companies aren't engaging at all. | |
| 17:57:38 | cardoe | You want devs and contributors, well I gotta convince these companies that it's not pointless to engage upstream on features. | |
| 18:10:06 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: ack Uggla fyi ^ | |
| 18:10:43 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: its not pointless but someone aslo need to actully do the work and chapiaion the idea. you are promoting it well | |
| 18:11:53 | cardoe | I picked this feature cause I thought it'd be the easiest since it had a spec, an implementation, it had tempest tests for nova, neutron, and ironic | |
| 18:13:09 | sean-k-mooney | right the context that is around it is many core reviewer have been feeling burn out due to the numebr of feature thaty are bign asked to review so it was propsoed that we shoudl approve less specs but try to activlly land the ones we do approve | |
| 18:13:37 | sean-k-mooney | a side effect of that was suggestin that cores shoudl only +2 a spec if they intend to spend time reviewin it | |
| 18:14:09 | sean-k-mooney | that why this didnt progress. its obvious that there is some interest in doing his | |
| 18:14:18 | sean-k-mooney | so i think it could happen next cycle | |
| 18:25:57 | cardoe | okay | |
| 21:56:54 | opendevreview | Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Fix image ID in libvirt metadata when unshelving https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942973 | |
| 21:56:55 | opendevreview | Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Add image meta to libvirt XML metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942766 | |
| 21:56:55 | opendevreview | Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Add more flavor metadata to libvirt guest XML https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942974 | |
| 22:00:32 | Callum027 | sean-k-mooney: Morning, thanks for getting in touch, I've rebased and adopted the suggestions you made to my patches | |
| 22:03:42 | sean-k-mooney | Callum027: thanks, im just wrappiping for today, i proably shoudl have stop about 4 hours ago :) but ill take alook again tomorrow once we get some ci results | |
| 22:03:58 | Callum027 | No worries, have a good evening | |
| 22:04:02 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 23:06:46 | melwitt | working on code near the server group late affinity check I noticed it looks like there has been a regression in the error handling of the check due to a past bug fix that changed what exception the late check raises https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2119578 | |
| 23:07:10 | melwitt | I just filed a bug to capture it | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-08-06 | |||
| 06:36:43 | auniyal | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/nova-distgit/+/58076 | |
| 06:36:43 | auniyal | hi sean-k-mooney, will you have access to merge this in nova-disgit | |
| 06:37:46 | auniyal | can you please provide review comments | |
| 06:38:29 | auniyal | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/admin/groups/1abd61acb05653e6333e01582fe4b118a7febc8c,members | |
| 06:38:29 | auniyal | we have only 1 nova-disgit core - sahid.ferdjaoui@redhat.com | |
| 06:38:35 | auniyal | sahid ? | |
| 10:33:53 | sean-k-mooney | auniyal: i did until october whne i asked to be removed form the list rdo cores for nova. artom and gibi have core rights | |
| 10:34:54 | sean-k-mooney | currently the only core right i still have in rdo are for cyborg | |
| 10:40:27 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: commeted on the bug | |
| 10:41:01 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/admin/groups/1abd61acb05653e6333e01582fe4b118a7febc8c,members | |
| 10:41:20 | sean-k-mooney | that is not the group we use | |
| 10:41:59 | sean-k-mooney | we use https://review.rdoproject.org/r/admin/groups/d90e2cf3a41ddec7e571c67ce63e10aed1b4e363,members but it looks like artom has not updated that yet to add gibi | |
| 10:42:47 | sean-k-mooney | anyway this is more a downstream or rdo converstaion since its not really in the scope fo the nova project | |
| 12:06:01 | auniyal | sean-k-mooney ack, | |
| 12:06:20 | sean-k-mooney | auniyal: there may be a review open ot update the list | |
| 12:06:32 | auniyal | still can you please have a look patch is okay | |
| 12:08:15 | auniyal | I added sahid, hopefully they will look | |
| 12:08:40 | sean-k-mooney | sahid does not work on this anymore | |
| 12:08:48 | sean-k-mooney | they may but its unlikely | |
| 12:09:00 | sean-k-mooney | so the patch shoudl be propsoed againt master first | |
| 12:09:06 | sean-k-mooney | not direclty to andeploe liek this | |
| 12:09:36 | sean-k-mooney | and you will need to backprot it in rdo | |
| 12:09:51 | auniyal | yeah I did that first https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/nova-distgit/+/58075 | |
| 12:10:05 | sean-k-mooney | right but you abandoned it | |
| 12:10:13 | auniyal | bust as we need this in 18 (downstream) I thought antelope is correct one | |
| 12:10:26 | sean-k-mooney | so it was not the wrong branch it ned to land there first and then backprot it to antelope | |
| 12:10:52 | auniyal | also I saw this - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/nova-distgit/+/57752 | |
| 12:11:20 | sean-k-mooney | that is diffent | |
| 12:11:50 | auniyal | oh okay, sure will create the backports then | |
| 12:12:03 | sean-k-mooney | althogh it likely shoudl have been done to master first as well | |
| 12:12:16 | sean-k-mooney | the reason its diffent is the depencies are diffent per branch | |
| 12:16:20 | mohsen__ | [compute] | |
| 12:16:20 | mohsen__ | this is my nova compute config: | |
| 12:16:20 | mohsen__ | I tried NUMATopologyFilter on nova scheduler along with cpu_dedicated_set config on the nova compute side. The scheduling process works completely fine. | |
| 12:16:20 | mohsen__ | hello dear friends. Is there anybody here who has ever tested the vCPU vs pCPU performance? | |
| 12:16:21 | mohsen__ | cpu_dedicated_set = 0-17,36-53 | |
| 12:16:21 | mohsen__ | cpu_shared_set = 18-35,54-71 | |
| 12:16:23 | mohsen__ | consider the fact that the cpu_shared_set value is on numa node 0 and cpu_dedicated_set is on numa node 1. | |