| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-07-15 | |||
| 16:26:36 | bauzas | #topic OpenAPI | |
| 16:27:33 | bauzas | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | |
| 16:27:33 | gmaan | last I checked yesterday, still 18 changes yet to review. | |
| 16:27:54 | bauzas | doh, jinxed | |
| 16:27:54 | bauzas | #info 18 remaining. | |
| 16:28:39 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:52 | bauzas | elodilles: happy to speak up ? | |
| 16:28:55 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:28:59 | elodilles | #info stable branches (stable/2025.1 and stable/2024.*) seem to be in OK state | |
| 16:29:09 | elodilles | well, i mean i haven't seen any issue | |
| 16:29:24 | elodilles | release nova stable versions: | |
| 16:29:31 | elodilles | 31.0.1 (2025.1 Epoxy) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/955058 | |
| 16:29:37 | elodilles | 30.0.2 (2024.2 Dalmatian) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/947847 | |
| 16:29:41 | elodilles | 29.2.2 (2024.1 Caracal) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/954474 | |
| 16:29:46 | elodilles | (the latter is preparation for 2024.1 Caracal to move to Unmainained in October) | |
| 16:30:08 | elodilles | they need a release liaison / PTL Code-review+1 | |
| 16:30:43 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:31:00 | elodilles | that's it from me about stable branches | |
| 16:31:06 | elodilles | bauzas: back to you | |
| 16:31:32 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:32:00 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:32:05 | bauzas | fwiesel: there ? | |
| 16:32:10 | fwiesel | No updates from my side. | |
| 16:32:48 | fwiesel | Back to you, bauzas | |
| 16:32:54 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:33:03 | bauzas | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal. | |
| 16:33:12 | gibi | hey that is me | |
| 16:33:21 | bauzas | gibi: anything to say except that you're awaiting eagerly for my reviews ? | |
| 16:33:30 | gibi | I was busy trying to unblock to land the last approved patch | |
| 16:33:50 | gibi | I'm waiting review starting at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 | |
| 16:34:23 | gibi | sorry wrong link | |
| 16:34:27 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948187/24 | |
| 16:34:31 | gibi | this is the good one | |
| 16:34:54 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 is valid but it has a rabbit hole we need to go into but maybe not right now. | |
| 16:35:13 | dansmith | gibi: I think we should go ahead with removing the eventlet dependency with that patch, no worse than today | |
| 16:35:15 | gibi | I have to go back and read dansmith's answer but I think we will procide with it | |
| 16:35:24 | gibi | yepp | |
| 16:35:38 | gibi | thanks dansmith for helping out | |
| 16:35:46 | dansmith | gibi: I'm POCing a proper fix to scatter-gather/multi-list that will make it do the thing we were thinking it does | |
| 16:35:57 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:36:04 | gibi | that will be an interesting patch :) | |
| 16:36:10 | dansmith | I'll try to get that working and proposed and then will try to circle back on reviews | |
| 16:36:16 | gibi | awesome | |
| 16:36:17 | dansmith | I also have outstanding glance pings | |
| 16:36:31 | dansmith | so, I don't want to over-promise :) | |
| 16:36:37 | gibi | no worries :) | |
| 16:36:46 | bauzas | excellent thanks | |
| 16:36:50 | gibi | I have no other news | |
| 16:37:21 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | (crickets) | |
| 16:37:30 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:38:06 | gibi | - | |
| 16:38:09 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:38:31 | bauzas | I'll be honest, I don't have the same energy than Uggla about skimming the long list of untriaged bugs | |
| 16:38:40 | bauzas | but I can give the baton to any volunteer | |
| 16:39:13 | bauzas | thanks all then :) | |
| 16:39:20 | bauzas | see you next week | |
| 16:39:21 | gibi | thanks folks | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.txt | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-15-16.00.html | |
| 16:39:22 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 15 16:39:22 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:39:22 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:39:26 | fwiesel | Thanks, everyone | |
| 16:39:27 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:39:33 | gmaan | thanks | |
| 16:41:17 | ratailor_ | thanks | |
| 17:34:07 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet timer from multi_cell_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954990 | |
| 17:34:08 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Parallelize s-g generators https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955091 | |
| 18:56:04 | opendevreview | Brett Holman proposed openstack/nova master: Add DMI data to non-x86 architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953989 | |
| 20:38:33 | sean-k-mooney | do we have a critiria for what can and cant go in nova-contrib? | |
| 20:40:34 | sean-k-mooney | now that it exists im wondering if it makes sense to port https://opendev.org/x/nfv-filters/src/branch/master/nfv_filters/nova/scheduler/filters/aggregate_instance_type_filter.py | |
| 20:41:52 | sean-k-mooney | i suspect that may not quite work any more due to the removal of log translation and six | |
| 20:42:46 | sean-k-mooney | but im wondering if we are ok with out of tree filters/weigher in nova-contrib in general | |
| 20:43:29 | sean-k-mooney | nova-contibe is not actully a valid python package | |
| 20:43:58 | sean-k-mooney | which is why im wondering how it can be used/extended over time | |
| 20:47:01 | sean-k-mooney | maybe a topic for the ptg? alhtough we likely shoudl at a minium add a licene file before the end of the release and likely a readme too even if its short | |
| 21:08:35 | dansmith | yeah, discuss next ptg.. I don't really want it to grow to a python package with all the release requirements (if we can help it) | |
| 21:09:10 | dansmith | and, I'd say I'm not sure if I want to encourage (via setting an example) out of tree drivers for interfaces that aren't really very strong, even though we all acknowledge that filter/weighers are pretty common | |
| 21:09:22 | dansmith | so not opposed, but think it might be good to set some ground rules | |
| 21:41:09 | opendevreview | Brett Holman proposed openstack/nova master: Add DMI data to non-x86 architectures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953989 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-07-16 | |||
| 01:18:10 | gmaan | finally this is merged, ceph job should be green now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/954949 | |
| 01:18:13 | gmaan | gibi: ^^ | |
| 07:32:27 | gibi | gmaan: thanks! | |
| 07:34:16 | gibi | gmaan: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954956 this now proves the the original problem is the ceph version 19.2.1 with pinned back packages to 19.2.0 the tempest test still passes. I'm in the process to find a way to report the bug to ceph upstream... | |
| 10:38:43 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: as a workaround shoudl we just move the affected jobs to debian like the nova-hybrid-plug job | |
| 10:38:56 | sean-k-mooney | i can push up a patch to just update the node set and see if that passes | |
| 10:39:38 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy swap back later if we want or keep the ceph jobs on debian. we have had no real issues with the hybrid plug job since we swapped | |
| 10:40:18 | sean-k-mooney | we are installing ceph via cephadm using containers fo the ceph version wont change it would just be the qemu and librbd/rados version that change | |
| 10:40:50 | sean-k-mooney | since that the only part that actully comes form the distro packages in the devstack job | |
| 10:41:15 | sean-k-mooney | assuming that works we coudl avoid skipping the testing | |
| 10:41:43 | sean-k-mooney | oh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/954949 merged... | |
| 10:42:07 | sean-k-mooney | well i guess i can propose a revert and depend on and test that as well | |
| 10:57:52 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move ceph jobs to debian to avoid bug 2116852 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955179 | |
| 10:58:23 | sean-k-mooney | so something like ^ | |
| 10:59:27 | sean-k-mooney | we can see if that passes and decied if we want to keep it disabled or just do that. we could also consdier doign the debian swap in the parent devstack jobs so it fixes it for everyone | |
| 10:59:51 | sean-k-mooney | so devstack-plugin-ceph-tempest-py3 and devstack-plugin-ceph-multinode-tempest-py3 | |
| 11:00:47 | sean-k-mooney | which are defiend in https://github.com/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/blob/master/.zuul.yaml | |
| 11:29:05 | gibi | I've added the Ceph project on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2116852 to let ubuntu see the issue | |
| 12:09:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Move ComputeManager to use spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948186 | |