Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-08
16:58:09 sean-k-mooney by the way {address="0000", managed=no} is technially valid today
16:58:14 gibi maybe a PTG discussion is in order with preparation listing all the cases that accepted today
16:58:27 sean-k-mooney but that only because we supprot partlial adresses
16:58:48 Uggla Can we move to the next one. As I'm unsure we manage to get out with something here.
16:58:53 gibi so address="0" is also a partial address as well as ""
16:58:59 gibi where is the line?
16:59:18 sean-k-mooney we draw it based on what we agreed in the specs orginally
16:59:47 sean-k-mooney and if thre was a bug in the spec we fix it with a new one or a bug that we dicusss in detail
17:00:05 gibi I agree that we need to discuss in detail
17:00:26 Uggla yep please can we stop on that one.
17:00:48 gibi we need a detailed plan what to rip off we cannot rip off address="" support if we keep address="0" I tink
17:00:50 bauzas I need to leave now
17:00:53 bauzas o/
17:01:21 Uggla Can we have a look at the latest one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2115870 I guess it is valid looking aat the patch attached.
17:02:10 gibi I have no context on volume retype
17:02:33 sean-k-mooney lets leave that for now and come back next week
17:03:08 Uggla ok end for today.
17:03:29 Uggla Thanks all
17:03:35 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-08-16.00.log.html
17:03:35 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-08-16.00.txt
17:03:35 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-07-08-16.00.html
17:03:35 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 8 17:03:35 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:03:35 Uggla #endmeeting
17:04:12 sean-k-mooney Uggla: for what its worth im not sure we have enough info in the bug to triage that
17:04:42 sean-k-mooney we dont know the souce/dest volume types, we dont knwo if it just change the qos ro actull moved data
17:05:00 elodilles thanks o/
17:05:03 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I guess the intend is clearer in the patch.
17:05:06 sean-k-mooney i.e. if this si between netapp san and ceph ectra
17:05:44 sean-k-mooney this is realted to how we store the nvram
17:06:10 sean-k-mooney but lets loop back to this when we have had tim to look ath this properly
17:06:28 sean-k-mooney there is potically some race condtions happenign here too so i think we need to look at this in detail
17:07:43 Uggla sean-k-mooney, no problem. I agree the bug is not accurate enough. But the description of the patch looks clearer.
17:08:40 Uggla I think I'll ask for a reproducer. Because that will clarify the need.
17:10:57 sean-k-mooney i think i know why this si happeing and i think its a side aeffect to a previous incorrect bugfix
17:11:58 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922354
17:12:45 sean-k-mooney that reverts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/906380 which was written for https://launchpad.net/bugs/1997352 but i dont think that patchs was correct
17:13:32 sean-k-mooney there fix is properly makign the nvram deletion contionall https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954210/2/nova/virt/libvirt/guest.py
17:13:51 sean-k-mooney and making sure we dont delete it as part of swap volume
17:14:10 sean-k-mooney but we also shoudl not be undefining it in most cases
17:14:43 sean-k-mooney the only time its valid to delete it is when deleting the vm or when rebuilding form uefi ot non uefi
23:25:00 gmaan sean-k-mooney: stephenfin: manager role code is ready, all tempest test are also green https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/policy-manager-role-default%22+status:open
23:26:49 sean-k-mooney awsome ill try and do a pass tomorow
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-09
00:38:21 gmaan thanks
07:20:17 opendevreview benlei proposed openstack/nova master: FIX: instance live migration failed after swap volume https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954210
09:52:52 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet.event.Event with threading.Event https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/949754
12:05:33 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for using cell-name in cell_v2 commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954460
13:02:42 gibi folks I don't have news / agenda for the eventlet meeting staring in 90 minutes. If you have feel free to add it. But if not then I will expect a short meeting today.
13:17:53 sambork gibi I added my update but it shouldn't take too much except maybe discussion/question about timeout replacement
13:17:56 gibi OK I see topics fro sambork
13:18:04 gibi :)
14:28:37 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Use updated_at to purge shadow_instance_extra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953984
14:28:38 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add a functional test to reproduce bug #2111129 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954504
14:31:04 gibi eventlet sync https://meet.google.com/bcy-uqoz-hje
14:32:55 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Use updated_at to purge shadow_instance_extra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953984
14:38:16 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Use created_at to purge shadow_instance_extra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953984
15:03:23 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Use created_at to purge shadow_instance_extra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953984
15:03:23 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add a functional test to reproduce bug #2111129 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954504
23:31:26 melwitt Uggla: just wanted to let you know about: #opendev peeps ran into this bug recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1856329 while troubleshooting some zuul provider errors. there is an old patch proposed here for it that could use some review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176
23:34:05 melwitt related discussion: https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23opendev/%23opendev.2025-07-09.log.html#opendev.2025-07-09.log.html#t2025-07-09T20:35:52
#openstack-nova - 2025-07-10
07:50:53 Uggla Thank you melwitt
09:24:00 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Update pci-passthrough and virtual-gpu documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948254
10:24:03 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Rename '[api] neutron_default_tenant_id' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952270
10:24:04 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove '[api] auth_strategy', NoAuthMiddlware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952272
10:24:04 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove deprecated pipeline_factory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952271
10:24:05 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: api: Remove version controller split https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954103
10:24:05 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Deprecate v2 API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954102
10:40:43 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server external events API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940508
10:40:44 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952281
10:40:44 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server password APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/945736
10:40:45 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for removed APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952282
10:40:45 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with server group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953281
10:40:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for images APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952284
10:40:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for networks API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952283
10:40:47 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use valid UUIDs for cinder resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952935
10:40:47 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Separate volume, snapshot and volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952347
10:40:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volumes APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952348
10:40:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Only apply "soft" additionalProperties validation to requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952936
10:40:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volume attachments APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952350
10:40:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952349
10:40:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for security group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952973
10:40:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for floating IP APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952972
10:40:55 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server usage audit log APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953209
10:40:55 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for services APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953196
13:15:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with keypairs APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952214
13:15:21 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Update pci-passthrough and virtual-gpu documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948254
13:24:37 opendevreview Markus Hentsch proposed openstack/nova master: Adapt to Cinder and Glance changes for image encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926326
13:37:56 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954149
13:37:57 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [PCI tracker]Remove non configured devs when freed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954613
13:57:42 gibi ^^ this was a tough one
14:18:54 sean-k-mooney ah i see the edge case this adresed
14:35:01 gibi sambork: FYI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/954324/comment/41b996aa_19440791/
14:44:46 sambork gibi, thanks I will take a look
14:50:41 sambork "It generally looks like the timeout work needs to be done in the same patch to ensure that we raise the error at the same level and update _InstanceEvent accordingly
14:53:55 gibi OK I can live with that :)
14:57:26 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: sqlalchemy: Use built-in declarative https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953751
15:36:30 sean-k-mooney sambork: kamil is this your upstream nic?
17:22:39 gmaan sean-k-mooney[m]: thanks for review on manager role. I agree to merge both change (policy granularity and default change to manager). I replied to this comment, if that make sense - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953063/7/nova/policies/migrate_server.py#101
17:23:34 gmaan oslo.policy implementation does not cover the policy granularity which is something we can implement in future but I used the deprecated_rule way so that we can handle the operator use case
17:25:39 gmaan I am mentioning it in deprecation_reason that policy is not deprecated and used to handle the custom policy case
17:32:19 gmaan sean-k-mooney[m]: I notice that we still have time for oslo lib freeze for this cycle, so let me try implementing the granular policy case in oslo.policy and then our implementation will looks good.

Earlier   Later