Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-03
16:26:29 gibi Uggla: questions are welcome
16:27:18 Uggla sure and I may spot some stuffs.
16:27:42 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:27:53 dansmith I know I'm lacking on those reviews, sorry, been covered up with other stuff
16:28:21 dansmith Uggla: in this section, I'm hoping to get you to agree to approve nova-contrib today so I can start pushing some things there
16:28:28 Uggla 951569: Add nova-contrib repository | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/951569
16:28:31 Uggla ;)
16:28:39 gibi dansmith: I understood the priority of your work
16:29:09 Uggla This is a request from Mr dansmith to create a new repo named nova-contrib
16:29:18 gibi +2 from me
16:30:00 Uggla +1 from me.
16:30:03 gmaan Uggla: project-config change waiting for your +1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/951570
16:30:21 gmaan once that is merged, governance change will be green
16:30:36 gmaan Uggla: thanks
16:30:53 Uggla gmaan I wanted to share this here, just to know if someone disagree. And warn people about it.
16:30:59 gmaan ++
16:31:41 Uggla I think bauzas already +2 as well.
16:31:53 bauzas we'll discuss that in the TC meeting
16:31:58 bauzas that's a governance patch
16:32:09 bauzas usually we need to await one week for merging it
16:32:18 dansmith it doesn't need discussion and the wait, AIUI, if it gets ptl ack for the related project
16:32:23 frickler not for new repos
16:32:26 gmaan bauzas: this is project-update and can be merged immediately
16:32:40 bauzas ack, I think it was about the gov patch
16:32:41 gmaan only dependency is project-config change to merge
16:33:57 Uggla I guess we all agree, so let's go ahead.
16:36:24 Uggla Do you have energy left to scrub a couple of bugs ?
16:37:13 Uggla bauzas, dansmith, gmaan ^
16:37:36 bauzas I have a TC meeting at the top of the hour and I was packed with meetings all the day along
16:37:49 bauzas so when telling whether I have energy, nope
16:37:57 bauzas and I dislike Red Bull
16:38:03 gmaan ditto. need to grab coffee before TC meeting
16:38:54 bauzas (also my Fedora installed some new kernel with some very incorrect grub options, I need to look at that)
16:41:07 Uggla ok so no triage for this week. I don't want to be a torturer. And I could finish my spec.
16:42:16 gmaan as you talk about spec, RBAC specs are ready for review :) manager role #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/937650
16:42:17 gmaan re-propose service role spec #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/951218
16:42:38 gmaan whenever anyone would like to take a look, no urgency
16:42:38 Uggla Thanks all
16:43:01 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-03-16.00.log.html
16:43:01 Uggla #endmeeting
16:43:01 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-03-16.00.txt
16:43:01 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-06-03-16.00.html
16:43:01 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jun 3 16:43:01 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:43:09 elodilles thanks o/
16:44:46 Uggla 15mn left bauzas, gmaan easy on the coffee. ;)
16:44:55 bauzas :)
16:45:10 bauzas I'm going to rejuvenate with a beer like every Tuesdays
16:46:00 gmaan Uggla: thanks :)
16:46:02 Uggla easy on that too, not to break your Fedora's grub. :)
16:51:30 Uggla dansmith, frickler fyi I have just +1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/951570 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/951569
16:51:53 Uggla dansmith, so I hope you will have your repo shortly.
16:52:08 dansmith I saw thanks!
16:52:31 Uggla dansmith, are you spying on me ? :D
16:52:43 dansmith gerrit is spying on my behalf
17:42:40 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable memfd support for shared memory backing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/951689
18:14:37 cardoe bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 is the spec I was talking about.
18:14:51 cardoe I'm happy to push people to make changes as asked.
18:15:27 cardoe There's at least 3 operators running the overall code changes in production today as downstream patches. I'm just trying to stop that and get it upstreamed.
20:02:10 sean-k-mooney cardoe: im still generally ok with this directionally by the way
20:02:59 sean-k-mooney cardoe: it would be good if you coudl atlesast respodn to the quetions i have inline but when we spoke about this on irc a while ago i generally tought this was a good idea
20:03:25 cardoe I can reply
20:18:21 cardoe You caught me originally with your requests as I was finishing packing to go on 2 weeks of PTO. First day back today. But I've replied now.
20:31:34 sean-k-mooney cardoe: no worreis we dont expect immiedate replies
20:36:56 sean-k-mooney cardoe: im jsut finsihing for today but the respocnes look good. ill try and review it again properly durign the week but im still +1 based on your comments
20:45:42 gmaan sean-k-mooney: I am not sure which channel we discuss it and not finding you in tc channel, I am pinging you here about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/949772
20:46:07 gmaan any response on email/ML etc otherwise I am thinking we should raise it in TC sights
20:48:28 sean-k-mooney gmaan: i can join if you liek
20:48:41 sean-k-mooney i join the tc channel occationaly but its not in my default list
20:49:13 sean-k-mooney gmaan: i have not reached out on the mailing list yet
20:49:16 gmaan Its up to you. I mean I can raise it in TC if you need help on this but wanted to check with you if any response you had other than gerrit?
20:49:56 sean-k-mooney what i can do is send a mail to the list with the cyborg and tc tags and ask for review on the gate blocker
20:50:14 sean-k-mooney if we dont get a responce to that in a week or so we can bring it up in the next relevent tc meeting
20:50:20 gmaan ++, if no response then I can add it in TC agenda to discuss
20:50:24 gmaan sounds good
20:50:48 sean-k-mooney im just finishing for today but ill do that shortly before i do
20:51:00 gmaan it is helpful because that helps TC to mark project status which is required by the release team before m-2
20:51:08 gmaan sure, no hurry
20:51:21 gmaan it was open in one of my tab so thought of pinging you
21:18:11 sean-k-mooney i sent a mail with subject "[cyborg][nova][tc] cyborg support for pyproject.toml and failing ci jobs."
21:18:49 sean-k-mooney gmaan: i did not offer to help maintian cyborg by reviewing the bot pathces and ci fixes liek this in that mail
21:19:32 sean-k-mooney if we get no reponce i might be able to help with that this cycle but at taht poitn we would liekly need to have the tc review cyborg overall health
21:21:19 gmaan yeah, fair enough.
21:22:39 sean-k-mooney ok its 22:22 which means i start about 12 hours ago so now is a good time to warp up before i start somethign else
21:22:45 sean-k-mooney chat to you tommrow o/
21:26:19 gmaan o/
#openstack-nova - 2025-06-04
07:20:02 zigo Has anyone seen something like this ?
07:20:02 zigo https://paste.opendev.org/show/bECP9P2mCs2kelxQhbgK/
07:20:02 zigo Under trixie (aka: Debian 13) + epoxy, I get lots of stack dumps like this one in nova-conductor.log:
07:20:02 zigo Hi there!
07:22:51 zigo https://paste.opendev.org/show/bOocYhL8mYOV0jf3m7ip/
07:22:51 zigo Looks like I'm also getting this when spawning a VM:
07:22:58 zigo Not sure if the 2 are related...
07:28:57 sean-k-mooney zigo: are you use galera or something like that? nova does not suppprot Active active galera nor those most of openstack for that matter
07:29:22 zigo Yes, but everything goes through *one* single node for writing.
07:29:31 zigo So it's more like active/passive...
07:29:45 sean-k-mooney ok that does work
07:29:50 sean-k-mooney its what we use downstream too
07:30:27 sean-k-mooney am the only other thing that comes to mind is maybe you have two compute service (condocutors in this case) with the same conf.HOST
07:30:59 sean-k-mooney i.e. you might have two conductor binaires trying to update teh same service record
07:31:00 zigo In my setup, conductor nodes are not compute nodes.

Earlier   Later