Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-04-25
14:53:01 dansmith gibi: thanks
15:10:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: FUP improve and add integration tests for PCI SR-IOV servers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944106
16:11:20 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948248
16:11:58 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948248
16:18:19 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Remove unnecessary PCI check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946625
16:23:16 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Remove unnecessary PCI check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948251
16:26:13 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Remove unnecessary PCI check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946623
16:39:13 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Update pci-passthrough and virtual-gpu documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948253
16:40:29 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Update pci-passthrough and virtual-gpu documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948254
16:41:00 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: FUP Update pci-passthrough and virtual-gpu documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948254
17:41:50 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948258
17:43:41 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948258
19:21:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove nova debugger functionality https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922496
19:21:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: split monkey_patching form import https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922425
19:21:58 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove superfluous monkey patching form func test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947237
19:41:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove workaround for ovn live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946950
21:16:12 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948276
21:16:48 opendevreview Thomas Rotsaert proposed openstack/nova master: feat(hypervisors) - Adding new hypervisor property `hypervisor_rack`. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948276
#openstack-nova - 2025-04-26
11:19:18 gibi sean-k-mooney: fyi the latest pyroute2 bump broke os-vif so I proposed a revert https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/948283
11:19:55 sean-k-mooney[m] didnt rodolfo fix that
11:20:20 sean-k-mooney[m] although we have not done a release since
11:21:18 sean-k-mooney[m] @gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/946977
11:21:47 gibi sean-k-mooney: that is just unit test adaptation
11:21:55 gibi what I see is interface detach broken in tempest
11:21:58 sean-k-mooney[m] gibi: oh its using asyncio
11:22:18 gibi yeah
11:22:25 gibi we need to remain on 0.8.1 I guess
11:22:30 sean-k-mooney[m] we do do that in tempset
11:22:47 sean-k-mooney[m] but i guess the bump was not done at the time
11:23:27 sean-k-mooney[m] we could try changing the executor for eventlet to asyncio but i think that also does not work properly yet
11:23:40 sean-k-mooney[m] ok well i think a revert for now makes sense
11:23:54 sean-k-mooney[m] and then we need to look deeper
11:24:22 gibi yeah
11:25:56 gibi anyhow I only stopped by for rechecks. I'm moving on :)
13:35:01 frickler I approved the revert, but I'd be interested in learning why this wasn't detected by the tempest job we are running on reqs, does it only affect ovs? maybe we should have a second tempest job in reqs, then?
14:56:20 gibi frickler: thanks. As far as I see it is only a problem if the interface detach times out due to slow node and retried by nova, the os-vif unplug is retried while I guess in pyroute2 something is still running for the first try. So probably the original tempest run does not hit it as it did not need to re-try the detach
18:15:19 sean-k-mooney i have not looked but there is a small chance that once we remvoe the linux bridge plugin we can entrily remove pyroute2 from os-vif
#openstack-nova - 2025-04-28
01:06:42 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
01:25:25 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
01:42:44 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
01:56:42 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
02:47:31 opendevreview Masanori Kuroha proposed openstack/nova master: Copy applied provider.yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948304
03:05:08 opendevreview Masanori Kuroha proposed openstack/nova master: Copy applied provider.yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948304
04:28:05 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
05:00:22 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
05:41:12 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
06:04:40 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
06:08:18 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [quota]Refactor group counting to scatter-gather https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948064
06:08:19 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Use futurist for _get_default_green_pool() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948072
06:08:19 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:Translate scatter-gather to futurist https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947966
06:08:20 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948079
06:08:20 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Replace utils.spawn_n with spawn https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948076
06:08:21 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move ConductorManager to use spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948187
06:08:21 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move ComputeManager to use spawn_on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948186
06:08:22 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rename DEFAULT_GREEN_POOL to DEFAULT_EXECUTOR https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948086
06:08:22 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make nova.utils.pass_context private https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948188
06:08:24 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: allow service to start with threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948311
06:08:24 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make the default executor configurable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948087
06:31:01 opendevreview DongHun, Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for memory allocation mode='immediate' in Nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948303
08:21:55 mkuroha @sean @gibi Hi, this patch is the initial implementation for the behavior change of additional.traits in provider.yaml that was discussed at the PTG: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948304 I would appreciate it if you could review the current code mm
08:48:04 bauzas gibi: so the goal for this week is about testing scatter-gather for the scheduler ?
08:52:57 gibi mkuroha: thanks for proposing that patch. It looks pretty clean and simple, so I like it. How do you feel about this approach?
08:54:55 gibi bauzas: yeah, I want to see the first light locally that nova-scheduler starts without monkey patching and with all the spawn calls actually taking native threads from a threadpool. If it start and not imediately fails that is already success. Then I will try throwing tempest at it and see if it works, does not hang, does not loose threads from the pool, etc.
08:55:34 gibi bauzas: it needs to depend the still open (and not fully working) oslo.sevice patch so this will be mostly local trials and maybe CI runs if I can extend devstack to pass env variable to nova-scheduler at start
08:56:27 gibi I expect that this means less actual reviewable patches proposed, and more WIP patches iterated
08:56:36 gibi this week.
08:57:01 gibi Also this week I'm off Thrusday, Friday
08:57:10 gibi so it is a short week anyhow
08:58:24 gibi so you can review the long series for spotting conceptual errors but that series is mostly WIP and expected to change based on the feedback provided by the local testing of scatter-gather in the scheduler in native threading mode.
08:58:43 gibi I will write up a post about how to replicate the local testing setup I have so others can try
09:10:27 bauzas gibi: cool, sorry wasn't nagged by a notification when you pinged me
09:10:44 bauzas gibi: I'll also be on PTO on Thur and Fri
09:11:36 bauzas gibi: so tbc, that's this gerrit branch that I could look at ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948064/3
09:12:20 gibi yes that is the one I'm trying to use to test things locally
09:12:36 bauzas noted
09:12:44 gibi there are two independent patches. A small delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947260?usp=search
09:13:03 gibi and the replacement series here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947212
09:13:29 gibi on the latter I expect Kamil to propose more similar patches this week
09:13:56 bauzas I already reviewed the hacking patch
09:14:10 gibi yeah, I just noticed. Thanks
09:14:41 bauzas for the moment, the removals and hacking patches were easy to review and without any concerns
09:14:45 gibi if you look at the recheck history of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947212 you see that our gate is not super happy
09:15:03 gibi I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/2109428
09:15:04 bauzas but the futurist branch needs more brain time for me :)=
09:15:17 gibi bauzas: yeah the long barnch is more complicated
09:15:20 gibi and less hashed out
09:15:50 bauzas yeah saw the libvirt failure
09:15:55 bauzas seems a new regression IMHO
09:16:17 gibi also we reverted a pyroute2 bump over the weekend https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/2109428
09:16:27 gibi sorry worng link
09:16:28 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/948283
09:17:12 gibi but the author of pyroute2 already responded in https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-vif/+bug/2109396 so that is nicely moving along
09:17:42 bauzas thanks for the info
09:18:50 gibi now that I'm back to relying on the upstream CI, I will spend more time caring for it and filing bugs j)
09:18:54 gibi :)
09:31:07 mkuroha gibi: Thank you for the confirmation!!:) I have one concern: I'm wondering if there is any concern in the behavior when /etc/nova/provider.yaml is deleted while /applied_provider_config/provider.yaml is present. (Current: the additional.traits of the resource provider and the /applied_provider_config/provider.yaml file remain.).
09:31:33 mkuroha Additionally, in this patch, are there any tests other than the nova's functional tests that should be added? (This is my almost first patch for nova, and I'm not very familiar with it, so I would like to confirm it.)
09:33:07 gibi mkuroha: good point about the edge case of deleting /etc/nova/provider.yaml. I think the expected behavior in this case that all the traits that are listed in the applied file is removed and then the applied file is deleted at the end.
09:35:25 gibi mkuroha: the functional test looks good to me. Adding one for the deleted provider.yaml case would be nice too. If you feel that the merge_provider_config or other changes could benefit from some unit test then that is also OK to add.
09:36:04 gibi but for me the current PoC would be enough to write and approve a spec

Earlier   Later