Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-04-22
16:05:19 Uggla #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:05:31 Uggla #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck
16:05:55 Uggla tbh, I have not looked at the jobs this time. Shame on me.
16:06:31 Uggla thanks bauzas for the info.
16:06:53 Uggla #topic tempest-with-latest-microversion job status
16:06:59 Uggla #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-with-latest-microversion&skip=0
16:07:09 Uggla #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tempest-with-latest-microversion&skip=0
16:07:51 Uggla Status is the same as I have not checked with Gmann about it.
16:08:06 Uggla #topic PTG summary
16:08:15 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.bf5f1185e201e31ed8c3adeb45e3cf6d
16:08:20 Uggla as a reminder
16:08:35 Uggla #topic Release Planning
16:08:43 Uggla #link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html
16:08:50 Uggla #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:09:09 Uggla #topic Review priorities
16:09:19 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-status
16:09:35 Uggla Still draft.
16:10:11 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:10:23 Uggla elodilles, please go ahead.
16:10:31 elodilles thanks o/
16:10:34 elodilles #info stable gates seems to be in good health
16:10:43 Uggla \o/
16:10:43 elodilles #info stable/2023.2 (bobcat) will move to End of Life next week
16:10:59 elodilles #info final 2023.2 bobcat releases are out: nova 2023.2 (28.3.1), placement 2024.2, 2024.1, 2023.2 (12.0.1, 11.0.1, 10.0.1)
16:11:22 elodilles thanks melwitt and sean-k-mooney for the tons of stable reviews o/
16:11:50 Uggla melwitt++
16:11:54 gibi indeed, thanks for making these releases full of backports
16:11:59 Uggla sean-k-mooney++
16:12:04 elodilles i think we just have to wait until the deadline and hope we did not introduce regressions o:)
16:12:29 gibi nah, what regressions, those are upgrade oportunities to caracal :)
16:12:33 elodilles :]
16:12:42 elodilles yepp :)
16:12:51 Uggla gibi, I like your mindset ! :)
16:13:00 elodilles btw, i've prepared nova stable releases for dalmatian and caracal as well
16:13:16 elodilles to not leave everything till the end o:)
16:13:35 elodilles nova: Release 2024.1 Caracal 29.2.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/947846
16:13:45 gibi early upgrade opportunities :)
16:13:49 elodilles nova: Release 2024.2 Dalmatian 30.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/947847
16:14:05 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:14:14 elodilles please add here if you find any gate issue ^^^
16:14:25 elodilles and that's all about stable from me for now
16:14:32 elodilles Uggla: back to you
16:14:40 Uggla thx elodilles !
16:14:44 elodilles np
16:15:16 Uggla #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal
16:15:25 Uggla #link Series: https://gibizer.github.io/categories/eventlet/
16:15:31 Uggla #link reminder patches to review: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22eventlet-removal%22+project:openstack/nova
16:15:49 Uggla gibi, anything new you want to share ?
16:16:06 gibi nope, you shared all what I had :)
16:16:12 bauzas as I said, I can help for reviewing the series
16:16:27 gibi any help is appreciated :)
16:16:36 bauzas cool
16:16:54 Uggla I know sean-k-mooney already reviewed some of them.
16:17:22 Uggla Having someone else would be great.
16:17:33 sean-k-mooney some yes melwitt looked at a couple too
16:17:40 sean-k-mooney but ya more the merrier
16:19:00 Uggla ok moving on to next topic
16:19:04 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:20:07 Uggla So I wanted to clean up a bit the new bugs. But I didn't have a chance to to it yet. Anyway I have selected 5 new bugs that looks properly defined.
16:20:33 Uggla So first one : https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2104255
16:22:08 Uggla So my expected outcome would be to know if we think it is a valid bug or not. If it is incomplete what to ask.
16:22:56 sean-k-mooney its valid. i looked at it breifly and chated about it on irc
16:23:00 bauzas Seems a caching issue
16:23:08 bauzas so yeah valid
16:23:20 sean-k-mooney tl;dr if the nova-comptue agent is started when the vf is attached to the vm
16:23:28 sean-k-mooney we cant get the network capablities
16:23:42 sean-k-mooney and we cache the vf info on start up in both nova and libvirt
16:23:59 sean-k-mooney libvirt invalidates its cache based on udev events
16:24:12 sean-k-mooney i.e. when the vf is returned to the host
16:24:32 sean-k-mooney nova does nto invlaidate its cache so that part of the problem
16:24:35 Uggla ok cool do not worry about settings the bug fields I'll do that later after the call
16:24:40 sean-k-mooney lets mark it valid and medium
16:24:46 Uggla great
16:24:49 sean-k-mooney and we can decied how to fix it later
16:24:51 Uggla next one:
16:25:13 Uggla https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2105987
16:26:18 sean-k-mooney so melwitt has a patch that might fix this indirectly
16:26:54 sean-k-mooney gibi: do you know if we merged the one to auto discover the config options and use the sdk to get the limits?
16:27:07 gibi sean-k-mooney: not top of my head
16:27:12 sean-k-mooney ack
16:27:20 gibi but the bug above links to a separate oslo.limit fix
16:27:24 sean-k-mooney so if this config option is not being repected in nova today
16:27:33 sean-k-mooney then its valid but we need to confirm that
16:27:35 gibi so I'm wondering if just using the latest oslo.limits fixes it for nova
16:27:56 sean-k-mooney ya i suspect that might be hte case
16:28:07 sean-k-mooney although im a bit confused
16:28:14 sean-k-mooney because the also have endpoint_interface
16:28:34 sean-k-mooney which i tought was ment to do the same thing as the new filed they just added
16:28:37 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.limit/+/946128/4/oslo_limit/opts.py
16:29:01 sean-k-mooney maybe we should ask if they set endpoint_interface=internal
16:29:12 sean-k-mooney in the bug and come back to this
16:29:32 sean-k-mooney ill go ask that
16:30:22 Uggla ok so we can set it to incomplete and then review it when it will be back in new.
16:31:35 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: sicne you wrote https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.limit/+/946128 you might be able to add some context to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2105987
16:31:58 sean-k-mooney Uggla: for what its worht we configure our dwonstream installer to use internal too
16:32:09 sean-k-mooney so im not entirly sure why the oslo change is requried
16:32:14 sean-k-mooney but we can move on
16:33:10 Uggla ok next one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2106073 this one was opened by Mohammed Naser, corfirmed on Ironic. And I'm pretty sure Mohammed proposed a fix for it.
16:34:54 Uggla btw I have just noticed sean-k-mooney commented on it.
16:35:39 sean-k-mooney ya so this is unfixable in nova without rewriting parts of the ironic deriver

Earlier   Later