| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-04-04 | |||
| 18:34:06 | sean-k-mooney | ill check that after im done | |
| 18:36:45 | sean-k-mooney | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bwJuKNE7VW3NvAjnxiWr/ | |
| 18:36:53 | sean-k-mooney | so cool i was able to boot a vm | |
| 18:37:01 | sean-k-mooney | it reserved the device | |
| 18:37:10 | sean-k-mooney | and after deleting it i now get a no valid host | |
| 18:38:01 | dansmith | \o/ | |
| 18:40:07 | sean-k-mooney | and cool i can reset it and boot again | |
| 18:40:37 | dansmith | \o\ /o/ \o/ | |
| 18:41:15 | sean-k-mooney | im too tired this envning to review the final functional test patch but ill do that on monday | |
| 18:41:22 | sean-k-mooney | i was testing with the reno patch just before it | |
| 18:41:41 | dansmith | no worries, good to have another confirmation, thanks | |
| 18:41:45 | dansmith | rest up for next week ;) | |
| 18:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 19:03:42 | dansmith | gmann: melwitt: this recently-added test seems to be failing a *lot* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/858885 | |
| 19:04:13 | dansmith | and it seems to be failing because the swap devices don't actually show up or disappear in the guest | |
| 19:05:01 | dansmith | probably because it doesn't wait for SSHABLE I'm guessing | |
| 19:05:37 | sean-k-mooney | that shoudl not matter for rezise since there is no hotplug | |
| 19:05:49 | sean-k-mooney | but i dotn think it will auto swap on | |
| 19:06:11 | sean-k-mooney | so depending on what the test is doing it might now be stable | |
| 19:06:46 | sean-k-mooney | hum blkid looking for type swap | |
| 19:07:02 | sean-k-mooney | do we format the disk with a swap partion | |
| 19:07:10 | dansmith | what I mean is, I'm not sure it's waiting for the instance to have actually been resized | |
| 19:07:20 | sean-k-mooney | oh | |
| 19:07:36 | sean-k-mooney | well that optentaly differnet | |
| 19:08:01 | dansmith | I guess the underlying stuff waits for the verify stage, so perhaps not | |
| 19:08:09 | dansmith | either way, seems to be quite flaky | |
| 19:08:13 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: swap is formatted | |
| 19:08:19 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 19:08:24 | sean-k-mooney | i tought it was but was not sure | |
| 19:08:59 | sean-k-mooney | im nmot sure why there are reboots in those tests | |
| 19:09:19 | dansmith | me either, but it's failing before the reboot | |
| 19:09:39 | sean-k-mooney | i get why its creating flaovr but im not sure why that part of the resize helper | |
| 19:10:00 | sean-k-mooney | i mena that fine just not what i expect form the function name | |
| 19:10:41 | dansmith | I also don't think the 2048_to_1024 test is doing anything particularly useful since it's not asserting the size of the device | |
| 19:11:39 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/b1e168015316f3f73131957e9fb6abfd2fdc20f1/tempest/api/compute/base.py#L441-L454 should be confirming as you said | |
| 19:11:50 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 19:12:09 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: thse looks like the tests were partly ported form the functional tests for the same thing | |
| 19:12:17 | sean-k-mooney | but those had more asserts | |
| 19:13:53 | dansmith | either way, I wonder if we should fast revert that.. it's been merged for less than 24 hours | |
| 19:15:04 | sean-k-mooney | probably if its flaky i say the pin to review a few days ago but didnt really have time to look at it | |
| 19:16:19 | dansmith | proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/946379 | |
| 19:18:04 | sean-k-mooney | its the remote command | |
| 19:18:37 | dansmith | looks like all the multicell jobs are failing this since it merged (which is only three amazingly) https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-multi-cell&skip=0 | |
| 19:18:59 | sean-k-mooney | [20:16:32]❯ blkid | |
| 19:19:01 | sean-k-mooney | /dev/nvme0n1p3: UUID="9e5b21f3-dd4d-425a-b309-dcfbf585ad16" TYPE="crypto_LUKS" PARTUUID="82a4c723-1748-43f6-b82d-f051b8d3a6c5" | |
| 19:19:03 | sean-k-mooney | /dev/nvme0n1p1: UUID="F3DE-29C6" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" PARTUUID="7208aa8f-8f44-432c-8163-693e4c1dcb8b" | |
| 19:19:05 | sean-k-mooney | /dev/nvme0n1p2: UUID="f84e29ae-bdd6-45a2-9590-f7d9fc71f90c" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="b2216aac-c4e1-4cf1-930b-37a879cb1cd3" | |
| 19:19:07 | sean-k-mooney | /dev/mapper/nvme0n1p3_crypt: UUID="0ebbc49c-51a0-4b8c-bdc1-702bf9d178b7" UUID_SUB="83086ee4-93b7-49c7-9915-0b8da9589da6" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="btrfs" | |
| 19:19:09 | sean-k-mooney | ~ via 🐹 v1.21.11 via 🐍 v3.11.11 | |
| 19:19:11 | sean-k-mooney | [20:16:35]➜ lsblk | |
| 19:19:13 | sean-k-mooney | NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS | |
| 19:19:15 | sean-k-mooney | loop0 7:0 0 76.8M 1 loop | |
| 19:19:17 | sean-k-mooney | loop1 7:1 0 76.8M 1 loop | |
| 19:19:19 | sean-k-mooney | zram0 252:0 0 15.6G 0 disk [SWAP] | |
| 19:19:21 | sean-k-mooney | nvme0n1 259:0 0 953.9G 0 disk | |
| 19:19:23 | sean-k-mooney | ├─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 1.1G 0 part /boot/efi | |
| 19:19:25 | sean-k-mooney | ├─nvme0n1p2 259:2 0 14.9G 0 part /boot | |
| 19:19:27 | sean-k-mooney | └─nvme0n1p3 259:3 0 937.9G 0 part | |
| 19:19:29 | sean-k-mooney | └─nvme0n1p3_crypt 253:0 0 937.8G 0 crypt /var/lib/docker/btrfs | |
| 19:19:31 | sean-k-mooney | /home | |
| 19:19:33 | sean-k-mooney | /swap | |
| 19:19:35 | sean-k-mooney | / | |
| 19:19:37 | sean-k-mooney | paste.o.o is donw | |
| 19:19:39 | sean-k-mooney | blkid wiht no args does not alwasy show swap | |
| 19:20:41 | sean-k-mooney | ah | |
| 19:20:50 | sean-k-mooney | so with sudo the swap disk show up | |
| 19:20:52 | sean-k-mooney | but not without | |
| 19:21:02 | sean-k-mooney | at least initally | |
| 19:21:22 | sean-k-mooney | once i run blkid with sudo the non sudo one has the swap partion too | |
| 19:21:31 | sean-k-mooney | so it must be caching or something like that | |
| 19:23:08 | dansmith | I suppose I won't recheck my patches since this has failed twice in a row on the same thing | |
| 19:23:23 | sean-k-mooney | https://paste.centos.org/view/ebce235e | |
| 19:24:15 | dansmith | yeah weird, but... busybox | |
| 19:24:33 | sean-k-mooney | well the last two are the gnu versions | |
| 19:24:48 | sean-k-mooney | busybox apprently does not show anything as non root | |
| 19:25:02 | sean-k-mooney | which could also be the problme here since cirror is useing busybox | |
| 19:25:08 | sean-k-mooney | which is why i cheked it | |
| 19:25:53 | dansmith | makes me think that this test wasn't actually running in whatever tempest configs are required to merge | |
| 19:27:24 | dansmith | anyway, nothing much I can do about it now I guess | |
| 19:27:37 | dansmith | I'mma go get food | |
| 19:28:12 | sean-k-mooney | did you hit the revert button | |
| 19:28:24 | dansmith | pasted above: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/946379 | |
| 19:28:41 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 19:31:07 | sean-k-mooney | ok commented on that too and now i need to go before the shops start to close o/ | |
| 19:42:16 | gmann | dansmith: ok, I did nto check multicell job but it was passing on regular one. agree to merge the revert first and then we can fix the test | |
| 20:11:44 | dansmith | gmann: I'm really not sure why the multicell job would be special here, almost like it is missing a regex exclude or something | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-04-05 | |||
| 01:03:21 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2025.2 Flamingo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/944603 | |
| 14:41:33 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove object_class_action https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946497 | |
| 14:45:31 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove workaround for old oslo.versionedobjects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946497 | |
| 15:29:39 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove workaround for old oslo.versionedobjects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946497 | |
| 15:33:42 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove workaround for old oslo.versionedobjects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946497 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-04-07 | |||
| 06:32:48 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: test the tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946534 | |
| 06:35:09 | zigo | melwitt: If this involves mdevs, so that's only affecting people using vGPUs, right? We only use pass-through, so we shouldn't be affected. | |
| 06:35:24 | zigo | I mean, about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2098892 | |
| 08:49:55 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: scheduler: fix _get_sharing_providers to support unlimited aggr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946538 | |
| 09:01:00 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: scheduler: fix _get_sharing_providers to support unlimited aggr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946539 | |
| 12:23:11 | Uggla | To all, because it wad probably unclear before the last changes I have done, our today's session will start a 15h00 UTC with the retro. | |
| 12:34:01 | cardoe | Hello all. Just want to ask if I can get reviews on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946095 Ultimately going to get it backported to 2024.1 which is where the issue first arose. Really just wanting this so that it is easier to troubleshoot why builds are failing. | |
| 12:54:31 | gibi | cardoe: thanks for the backport. I added my # | |
| 12:54:39 | gibi | my +2 | |