Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-26
18:21:22 opendevreview Douglas Viroel proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing scheduler_hints in server details https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938604
18:30:41 gmann sean-k-mooney: sure, checking
18:50:39 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add live_migratable flag to PCI device specification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942144
18:50:39 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Augment the LiveMigrateData object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942143
18:50:40 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update conductor and filters allowing migration with SR-IOV devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942146
18:50:40 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update manager to allow vfio pci device live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942145
18:50:41 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver to map the targeted address for SR-IOV PCI devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942147
19:04:47 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update conductor and filters allowing migration with SR-IOV devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942146
19:04:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver to map the targeted address for SR-IOV PCI devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942147
19:14:58 mikal Morning
19:19:22 opendevreview Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Add image meta to libvirt XML metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942766
19:21:52 opendevreview Ryota, Ochiai proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Delete deprecated settings of the installation guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896074
20:12:31 gmann sean-k-mooney: dviroel: reviewed the nova and tempest change, we are missing the update server APIs changes which is also impacted when we update the views/servers.py
20:13:04 gmann in nova side it is just documentation and test and in tempest tests we need to add schems and test for update server
20:16:28 dviroel gmann: oh thanks, I missed the update server. going to propose an update, thanks
20:20:48 opendevreview Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Add image meta to libvirt XML metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942766
20:29:59 opendevreview Callum Dickinson proposed openstack/nova master: Add image meta to libvirt XML metadata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942766
20:53:24 opendevreview Douglas Viroel proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing scheduler_hints in server details https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938604
21:27:41 opendevreview Max proposed openstack/nova master: feat: nova-manage db instance events cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/916927
22:03:36 gmann 34
22:05:02 gmann please ignore
22:09:34 gmann dviroel_bbl: ack
22:11:34 sean-k-mooney[m] gmann: so dviroel dint modify server update in this api microverions
22:12:04 sean-k-mooney[m] if we missed that in this change its also missing from 2.98
22:12:17 sean-k-mooney[m] for the image properies in server show
23:30:41 dviroel sean-k-mooney: and pinned_availability_zone in 2.96 too
23:31:24 sean-k-mooney[m] yes more then likely but we should fix that seperatly
23:33:48 dviroel my tempest change is not going to pass without theses fixes in tempest side, since now I am testing update server too, and thy are missing
23:38:38 gmann sean-k-mooney[m]: it does. this line change the update server API also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938604/12/nova/api/openstack/compute/views/servers.py#335
23:39:42 sean-k-mooney[m] in directly via reusing show
23:40:03 gmann basically we have to keep these 4 APIs (GET, GET details, Rebuild, update server) response consistent (we fixed it in 2.74). I commented in the spec also to mention all these 4 APIs response change together
23:41:19 gmann I did not check earlier microversion 2.98 or 2.96 but we should keep all these 4 APIs response consistently and they get changed together when we change the views/servers.py
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-27
00:20:45 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} for "Epoxy" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942871
00:20:46 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Below version constants removal for MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942872
00:24:55 dviroel gmann: thanks for proposing the fix to 2.96 and 2.98 in tempest
00:28:52 gmann dviroel: those should fix and nova documentation for 2.96, 2.98 we can fix after that
00:29:42 dviroel +1
02:09:12 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Fix microversion 2.96 for update/rebuild APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942875
03:39:44 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Fix microversion 2.96 for update/rebuild APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942875
04:53:16 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Fix microversion 2.98 doc/tests for update/rebuild APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942878
09:17:05 jkulik anybody up for a review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942371 ? it's a 2-line fix for a bug in libvirt's maxphysaddr support
09:22:14 gibi jkulik: thanks for fixing that bug, if you can fix my comment in the unit test then I'm happy to +2 it
09:22:53 jkulik gibi: thanks. will do
09:33:12 opendevreview Johannes Kulik proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: fix maxphysaddr passthrough dom parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942371
09:55:43 gibi jkulik: thanks, +2
10:17:32 frickler looks like tempest.api.compute.servers.test_create_server.ServersV294TestFqdnHostnames.test_verify_hostname_allows_fqdn is unstable, haven't seen this before https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/4cb5f1127e464ab3b2b5cf651fd5ac9e
10:54:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Below version constants removal for MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942872
10:54:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} for "Epoxy" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942871
11:02:04 Uggla sean-k-mooney[m], it you have time, can you review migration serie --> 942143: Augment the LiveMigrateData object | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942143
11:24:51 sean-k-mooney Uggla: i can see if i can fidn time i reviewd one patch breifly last night
11:50:35 sean-k-mooney bauzas: can i get your advice on something. one of the things i have said i woudl do for watcher as part of the release liason role is prepare the cycle highlights and release note prelude.
11:50:43 sean-k-mooney bauzas: im lookign at https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/ptl-guide.html#milestone-3
11:50:56 sean-k-mooney and the thing that need to be doen between m3 and rc1
11:51:35 sean-k-mooney i dont see the release note prelude in that list but do you normally base one on teh toher i.e. the prelude on the cycle highlight and vise versa
11:52:40 sean-k-mooney is there anything that is easy to miss doing that is time sensive that you would call out
11:59:50 sean-k-mooney watcher does not have a equivalent doc so im probely goitn go steal nova and updte it a lltie with a new title and add it to watcher after the release
12:00:20 sean-k-mooney "Chronological Release Milestone guide" or soemthing like that
12:14:48 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add new option to enforce multipath volume connections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845660
12:16:14 tkajinam Does anyone have time to review this tiny cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939027 ?
12:20:17 tkajinam stephenfin, thanks !
12:22:17 sean-k-mooney yep looks good
12:22:33 sean-k-mooney we will want to add 3.13 early next cycle
12:24:31 stephenfin and hopefully remove 3.9
12:25:04 tkajinam hopefully though you may have to make sure that c9s is fully replaced by c10s in RDO
12:25:21 stephenfin indeed
12:25:31 tkajinam IIRC python 3.9 is the system python in c9s
12:26:04 sean-k-mooney 3.9 cant be removed until 2026.1
12:26:22 sean-k-mooney we need to support both c9s and c10s in 2025.2 for upgrades
12:27:03 tkajinam you can make 2025.1 as the pivot between c9s and c10s I guess
12:27:28 tkajinam as we did for train
12:27:28 sean-k-mooney no becuase it was not aviable at the start of the 2025.1 cycle
12:27:29 tkajinam which may be better given some people may try direct upgrade from 2025.1 to 2026.1
12:27:36 sean-k-mooney so its not in the officl testing runtimes for this release
12:27:44 tkajinam yeah that's the problem
12:27:50 sean-k-mooney the first tiem c10s can be added is 2025.2
12:28:03 tkajinam there may be number of things we have to address such as redis->valkey
12:28:16 sean-k-mooney the other issus is
12:28:32 sean-k-mooney c10s is built with the x86_64v4 profile in gcc
12:28:42 sean-k-mooney meaning it wont run on the old rackspace cloud provider
12:29:15 sean-k-mooney so we will need to restrict the node set ot vexhost and the newer rax-flex cloud
12:29:25 sean-k-mooney maybe ovh but that will need testing to confirm
12:29:35 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: Could you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/932399 and its predecessor?
12:29:50 tkajinam another fun transition :-P
12:29:51 sean-k-mooney oh finally yes
12:30:14 tkajinam I was only aware of complete migration to nmcli as a blocker. that's a good thing to know.
12:30:43 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: i tought i had a patch for this but your has a +2 so i dont even care if it id :)
12:31:58 sean-k-mooney stephenfin: hehe ya i did https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/899947
12:32:09 stephenfin yup, and they both failed due to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/919581
12:32:16 stephenfin or rather, because https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/919581 wasn't in yet
12:32:51 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: wdywtd? I'm happy with either, seeing as they're identical
12:33:17 sean-k-mooney i already appoved yours
12:33:20 stephenfin ack
12:34:42 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: You're going to need to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/939637 too, I suspect, otherwise the py312 tests will fail
12:36:51 sean-k-mooney ... droping '' form the message
12:36:53 sean-k-mooney ok
12:37:41 sean-k-mooney we might want ot rewrite that test but teh current fix is ok
12:39:51 tkajinam stephenfin, do you have a min to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939721 ?
12:39:59 tkajinam I thought I proposed it but I didn't it seems
12:41:09 stephenfin ack, done
12:42:02 tkajinam stephenfin, and another cleanup related to oslo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940619

Earlier   Later