Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-13
19:04:44 bauzas ok
19:05:27 bauzas OK then let's go for specifying them
19:05:31 bauzas thanks
19:06:01 sean-k-mooney the other reason they have to be seperated is
19:06:32 sean-k-mooney with the new weither if the new config option is not defied we effectivly weigh each option as 1
19:06:35 sean-k-mooney i.e. evenly
19:07:03 sean-k-mooney but when its defiend we woudl only apply the weigts to the specified values and ignore the rest
19:07:30 sean-k-mooney where as for the metric weigher the cofnig option is required for it to work
19:07:40 sean-k-mooney instead of being optional
19:07:46 sean-k-mooney so we dont want to share it
19:26:01 mikal Morning
19:29:09 mikal It seems like its been fairly quiet on the spice patches overnight, apart from gmann approving the temptest test (thanks gmann!). Are there any actions items for me right now that I should know about?
19:29:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: fine, then I'll just provide *one* additional config option, by default we'll stick to evenly weigh the props
19:30:25 sean-k-mooney +1
19:30:50 sean-k-mooney mikal: i honestly didnt have time to look at the current state
19:31:03 sean-k-mooney but you got it to the point of workign and testign in a ci job
19:31:19 sean-k-mooney so i think we could move forward with merging some/all of these?
19:31:24 mikal sean-k-mooney: yeah, no worries.
19:31:41 sean-k-mooney alos we should move forward iwth os-trait patch if not allready done?
19:31:46 mikal sean-k-mooney: yes. The tempest test passes in the ovs-plug job, assuming that the entire rube goldberg machine of changes is landed
19:31:52 gmann mikal: pinged frickler for devstack change 2nd review review in qa channel
19:32:14 mikal sean-k-mooney: yeah, once the spice-direct series is landed the os-traits change will be the main thing blocking me. It blocks the sound / usb changes.
19:32:18 mikal gmann: thank you.
19:32:46 sean-k-mooney we need a second +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/940418 and we need to a release before the non clinet lib freeze next week
19:32:54 mikal sean-k-mooney: I am a little unsure if we want to compress your zuul changes into a single change with the spice API changes or keep it like this. I definitely don't want to take credit for your work by stealing your changes.
19:33:21 sean-k-mooney steal all the things
19:33:27 mikal sean-k-mooney: that freeze is a week before feature freeze, or at the same time?
19:33:29 sean-k-mooney im fine with squashing them if you want
19:33:38 gmann bauzas: not sure if you see my message early this week. but let me know what I need to do to get this spec merged? I added it in Nova meeting agenda for spec exception approval (but i would not be able to attend meeting due to time conflict). I started code change in parallel if that help, manager role is almost ready and will work on service role change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/937650
19:33:49 sean-k-mooney mikal: the non client freeze is a week before feature freeze
19:33:52 mikal sean-k-mooney: I'd prefer to not squash them unless there's a really solid reason why we should. I think the history is useful.
19:34:16 sean-k-mooney then i think we can jsut try and move them forward as is
19:34:22 bauzas gmann: this cycle, I unfortunately don't have a lot of time upstream
19:34:26 bauzas so I saw your ping
19:35:01 sean-k-mooney gmann: is the code written and tested?
19:35:13 sean-k-mooney becasue otherwise i think this need to go to next cycle
19:35:14 bauzas yeah, that's my question
19:35:43 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941056
19:35:48 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941347
19:35:49 gmann sean-k-mooney: I have started that, manager role changes is almost ready (fixing some unit and tempest test)
19:35:51 sean-k-mooney are teh nova patches
19:36:02 gmann service role change I will work soon
19:36:03 gmann https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/policy-service-and-manager-role-default%22
19:36:18 gmann ^^ this is all series where service role changes i need to rebase/fix
19:36:37 sean-k-mooney oh there are others ok
19:37:21 sean-k-mooney we kind of have a lot of patches that need review so i kind of feel like this should move to next cycle
19:37:34 sean-k-mooney on the ohter had i dont really want to be the one to punt it so..
19:39:06 gmann well, thing is I am not sure if I can spend more time on upstream activities in next cycle (depend on various factor) so I thought of getting it done in nova this cycle
19:40:50 gmann anyways I added it in meeting agenda and will be ok based on how team decide. unfortunately I will not be able to attend meeting but you knows the current situation on this so I will check meeting log/decision.
19:44:37 bauzas gmann: noted, we'll discuss this on next tues
19:44:45 gmann bauzas: thanks
19:45:58 bauzas sean-k-mooney: one last question about the weigher, do we agree on the fact that props not set on the pre-prop setting won't be weighed ?
19:46:21 bauzas we'll just skip them if so
19:46:58 bauzas ie. default of non-set props will be 0.0
19:49:08 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver to deal with managed flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938405
19:49:08 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed flag to PCI device specification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937649
19:56:48 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i think that make the most sense
19:57:14 sean-k-mooney bauzas: so sure you can use wights.get(name, 0.0)
19:57:28 bauzas that's litterally what I wrote :D
19:57:43 bauzas sending the WIP for the FUP in a very sec
19:58:07 mikal sean-k-mooney: I need to wander off and get ready for work. I'll check in again this evening but y'all look busy on other things today which is fine.
20:00:16 sean-k-mooney im on pto tomorroow but ill try and make time on monday
20:00:49 mikal No worries
20:22:21 birbilakos_ hello
20:22:26 birbilakos_ After some network changes in my 2023.2 deployment which broke network connectivity to one controller node (and reverting that back) I get bombarded by these type of errors: https://paste.opendev.org/show/b8QRG6bxWiKh9CLM79oR/
20:22:40 birbilakos_ i also see that several nova actions either timeout or are very slow to go through. any ideas how to recover this?
20:23:26 birbilakos_ rabbitmq containers seem to be running fine, also checked the management web interface of rabbitmq and didn't notice anything strange
20:24:21 sean-k-mooney that just looks like issue with rabbit mq
20:24:53 sean-k-mooney it does not look like its really nova specific beyond tat
20:25:42 sean-k-mooney the messagign timeout may be because you restart nova conductor for example
20:25:47 sean-k-mooney and the requestrs were lost
20:25:57 sean-k-mooney or restart rabbitmq
20:28:25 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova master: Add project manager role in Nova API policy rule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941347
20:46:47 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: per-property ImageMetaPropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941601
20:46:47 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a new ImagePropertiesWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940642
20:52:06 birbilakos_ thanks sean
20:52:32 birbilakos_ how do i proceed then? currently nova is reporting missing messages and also fails to do actions
20:53:22 birbilakos_ e.g. instance creation and deletion is a hit and miss... sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-14
01:56:58 opendevreview Antony Messerli proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Corrects a typo on a placement audit command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922850
02:14:28 tkajinam Hi I wonder if https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931582 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/936287 can get 2nd +2 so that we can get rid of netifaces ?
02:15:46 tkajinam gibi bauzas melwitt ^^^ in case you have time for reviewing these
04:06:43 MengyangZhang[m] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-01-15-14.00.log.html#l-57:~:text=%3Cjbernard%3E%20thanks-,14%3A15%3A34,-%3Cjbernard%3E%20%23topic). In addition, neutron has already supported similar features of live updating network QoS to ports and per-project control of QoS policies.
04:06:43 MengyangZhang[m] Hi folks, I was wondering if the community is interested in this feature: Enhanced Granularity and Live Application of Volume QoS (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/enhanced-granularity-and-live-application-of-volume-qos). Since this would be a cross-project efforts, we first proposed it to Cinder folks and received positive feedback. (See discussion here:
04:07:52 MengyangZhang[m] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-01-15-14.00.log.html#l-57:~:text=%3Cjbernard%3E%20thanks-,14%3A15%3A34,-%3Cjbernard%3E%20%23topic). So we would like to hear the feedback from the nova community.
04:07:52 MengyangZhang[m] * Hi folks, I was wondering if the community is interested in this feature: Enhanced Granularity and Live Application of Volume QoS (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/enhanced-granularity-and-live-application-of-volume-qos). Since this would be a cross-project efforts, we first proposed it to Cinder folks and received positive feedback. (See discussion here:
08:02:40 gibi tkajinam: approved the series. Thanks for improving nova's health
08:19:23 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver to deal with managed flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938405
08:19:23 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed flag to PCI device specification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937649
09:22:35 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP:Reproducer for cold migration on shared storage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940304
10:36:53 tkajinam gibi, thanks !
10:38:34 tkajinam ugh it seems we have to fix unit tests now...
10:47:06 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop dependency on netifaces https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931582
10:48:04 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add unit test coverage of get_machine_ips https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/936287
11:12:59 gibi tkajinam: thanks for fixing it
14:53:28 MengyangZhang[m] do we have a nova meeting today?
15:21:01 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug/2098496 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941673
15:23:25 dansmith sean-k-mooney: can you +2 this so we can get this fix landed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940604/8
15:24:37 bauzas dansmith: sean said he was on PTO but I can take a look
15:29:50 dansmith oh right
15:30:22 dansmith bauzas: well, it was specifically because he had comments already, but I think they're addressed and just wanted that ack so we could move on

Earlier   Later