| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-02-10 | |||
| 14:09:58 | sean-k-mooney | so proably an issue on the underlying host like an OOM kills would be my guess | |
| 14:10:27 | sean-k-mooney | if they cant root cause it tell them to file a nova but and let use know and we can maybe point them in the right direction | |
| 15:10:57 | bauzas | hmmmpffff, I got a similar nova-next and nova-multicell failure for my patch | |
| 15:10:59 | bauzas | https://6944f33f3ef66c20bc22-320386062a8fef96051148fe5e7af6b1.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/940642/5/check/nova-next/c60809e/testr_results.html | |
| 15:11:05 | bauzas | https://8ea52cf6ed28836394cc-227b19b7b0e554c64ba32d661a445fcc.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/940642/5/check/nova-multi-cell/13c8443/testr_results.html | |
| 15:11:18 | bauzas | looks like our lordy gate is b0rken | |
| 15:43:20 | MengyangZhang[m] | migration, utilizing migrate_data to update the current XML. | |
| 15:43:20 | MengyangZhang[m] | During the live migration process, pre_live_migration is called on the source host, which calls the Cinder API to re-create volume attachments, updating connection_info and attachment_id on all volume BDMS to reflect the new destination host attachment and returns the information as migrate_data. Then nova performs live migration by calling LibvirtDriver(driver.ComputeDriver)'s live_migration method to execute the live | |
| 15:43:20 | MengyangZhang[m] | <sean-k-mooney> "Mengyang Zhang: i suspect the..." <- Hi Sean, after giving another thought about this. I don't think we need to add this min version check. Migrating instances between compute hosts with different versions should be fine. | |
| 15:47:49 | MengyangZhang[m] | * Hi Sean, after giving another thought about this. I don't think we need to add this min version check. Migrating instances between compute hosts with different versions should be fine.... (full message at <https://matrix.org/oftc/media/v1/media/download/ASNbn5eOSN0eZUGb2nl-I79qeQk8MrG28vSQcbe97Ljgln-5krYH4sKDCO_d1rvB2o3m5nhyeSYEkc3QXYITUeZCeVOKSligAG1hdHJpeC5vcmcvd0NYdFZjcU1wQ3d6cXBvbVdUWGdFWURI>) | |
| 15:49:39 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add managed flag to PCI device specification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937649 | |
| 15:49:40 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver to deal with managed flag https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/938405 | |
| 15:49:44 | opendevreview | Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Re-create volume backed root before destroy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941095 | |
| 16:03:40 | bauzas | good news are that apparently nova-next runs are not really stopped https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=nova-next&skip=0 | |
| 16:04:08 | sean-k-mooney | stopped? | |
| 16:04:14 | sean-k-mooney | by what? | |
| 16:04:33 | sean-k-mooney | oh you saw a few failures | |
| 16:04:36 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: see my above comment ^ | |
| 16:05:00 | sean-k-mooney | MengyangZhang[m]: migration woudl fail in pre-livemigrate | |
| 16:05:42 | sean-k-mooney | actully no it would not | |
| 16:06:22 | sean-k-mooney | MengyangZhang[m]: migrating form an upgraded compute to an non upgraded one will generate the correct config | |
| 16:06:33 | sean-k-mooney | but then if you hard reboot the qos config would be lost | |
| 16:07:01 | sean-k-mooney | so we woudl need to have the migration fail in that case | |
| 16:46:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: api: Allow min/max_version arguments to response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/936364 | |
| 16:46:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Remove legacy API artifact https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937377 | |
| 18:50:18 | mikal | Was there a zuul outage yesterday or something? CI doesn't seem to have run on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924844 after about 10 hours. | |
| 19:23:02 | sean-k-mooney | there was yesterday at some point i think | |
| 19:23:11 | sean-k-mooney | not today that im aware of | |
| 19:27:44 | sean-k-mooney | mikal: it looks like the last buidl for that was https://zuul.openstack.org/buildset/5704a9aeddb44126966dad2b267a6263 | |
| 19:28:03 | sean-k-mooney | so around "2025-02-09 00:09:08" | |
| 19:29:30 | sean-k-mooney | mikal: i see your recheck from 30 mins ago but i dont see anyign in zuul for that | |
| 19:30:20 | sean-k-mooney | i wonder is there a merge confligt with the depends on agaisnt my patch | |
| 19:32:06 | mikal | Yeah, I did that recheck because I couldn't find any evidence that zuul had actually run a check on the latest patchset. | |
| 19:32:55 | mikal | That recheck did cause the vmware test to run at least, but I agree I can't see anything in zuul. | |
| 19:33:04 | sean-k-mooney | let me rebase my patch quickly | |
| 19:33:28 | sean-k-mooney | v4 is not based on teh latest verion of its parent https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940873/4 | |
| 19:33:43 | mikal | I fixed a typo in one of yours to remove a stray pep8 error in my test results. I wonder if that is the problem?> | |
| 19:33:52 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Dont deploy n-spice on compute nodes. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940873 | |
| 19:34:32 | sean-k-mooney | maybe, when you did that you did not update the follow up patch which is the one your referncing | |
| 19:34:53 | mikal | Yeah, I did it quickly in the web UI and didn't really think it through... | |
| 19:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | ok now its running | |
| 19:35:46 | sean-k-mooney | that was all that was wrong it seams | |
| 19:36:24 | sean-k-mooney | https://zuul.openstack.org/status?change=924844 | |
| 19:36:27 | mikal | Oh nice. Thank you. | |
| 19:36:56 | mikal | gmann left some comments on the tempest patch, so I'll address those today now that I have a test run to observe. | |
| 19:37:18 | sean-k-mooney | ya i clicked into it but didnt look at the code yet | |
| 19:38:13 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think ether of the issues will prevent the test form running but the feedback maskes sense | |
| 19:38:49 | sean-k-mooney | at least with my almost 0 knowladge of tempest convetions if gmann says it shoudl be done a certin way i tend to agree :) | |
| 19:39:16 | mikal | I see your zero knowledge and raise you negative knowledge! | |
| 19:39:24 | mikal | I just cargo culted the previous VNC test. | |
| 19:41:08 | sean-k-mooney | well you actully implemnted part fo the spice handshake it seams | |
| 19:41:25 | sean-k-mooney | so you proably deserve more credit then your giving yourself | |
| 19:42:20 | mikal | Heh. Well yeah, the scaffolding is all cargo culted. The SPICE protocol bit was a cut and paste from the Kerbside code and some tweaks. | |
| 19:42:54 | JayF | good artists borrow; great artists steal :) | |
| 19:43:18 | mikal | Heh | |
| 19:43:34 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: has there been any more discussion of an os-traits release? I think that blocks the other patchset for now. | |
| 19:44:45 | sean-k-mooney | are the traits patches merged | |
| 19:45:17 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: commented in devstack change to enable tempest cofig option also, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/940838 | |
| 19:45:55 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/940418 | |
| 19:46:06 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: did you see my nova job changes? | |
| 19:46:26 | gmann | sean-k-mooney this one? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/940873 | |
| 19:46:38 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 19:47:02 | gmann | yeah, but that does not set tempest config | |
| 19:47:07 | sean-k-mooney | so that is what enabled the testing in the nova check pipelien | |
| 19:47:23 | sean-k-mooney | right so ill update devstack with the change you susggeted | |
| 19:47:30 | gmann | either you can set tempest option also in job or better is devstack set it based on nova configuration | |
| 19:47:38 | sean-k-mooney | i was orginling thinkign of configuring that in the job as a followup | |
| 19:47:48 | gmann | i see | |
| 19:47:56 | sean-k-mooney | but im fine with devstack | |
| 19:48:12 | gmann | that will be easy if we want to test it in more jobs or so | |
| 19:49:32 | sean-k-mooney | sure so i dont neesisaly want to kick the current run out of the gate on the other hand the job has not started yet its still queue | |
| 19:49:55 | sean-k-mooney | so will i just do it now or do it after the current execution completes so we have one test run? | |
| 19:50:10 | sean-k-mooney | i guess in its current state it wont run the new test | |
| 19:50:20 | sean-k-mooney | so its proably better to update devstack now | |
| 19:50:24 | gmann | yeah | |
| 19:51:02 | gmann | at least to merge the tempest tests (which is almost ready), we need to see test running somewhere. | |
| 19:52:02 | sean-k-mooney | yep, do you have an example of how we set this in devstack normally | |
| 19:52:11 | sean-k-mooney | is it in lib/tempest or lib/nova | |
| 19:52:28 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: no, the os-traits change hasn't seen any more review recently. | |
| 19:52:48 | sean-k-mooney | ah found it | |
| 19:53:15 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: here https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/lib/tempest#L417 | |
| 19:53:50 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: you can add both condition 'is_service_enabled n-spice || [ "$NOVA_SPICE_ENABLED" != False ]' there same as how nova is configuring | |
| 19:55:04 | sean-k-mooney | ... whitespace https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/940838/3/lib/tempest | |
| 19:55:42 | sean-k-mooney | so i need ot update that again anyway, i can do that if you liek but tempest is normmaly only installed on the contoler where the spice/serial proxy runs | |
| 19:56:02 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: I think you should add "$NOVA_SPICE_ENABLED" != False also like done in lib/nova | |
| 19:56:15 | sean-k-mooney | if i add || [ "$NOVA_SPICE_ENABLED" != False ] | |
| 19:56:21 | sean-k-mooney | will it break on the compute | |
| 19:56:31 | sean-k-mooney | on i guess tempet wont be enabeld on the compute | |
| 19:56:40 | sean-k-mooney | and if it was then it would be correct to do this ther too | |
| 19:56:44 | sean-k-mooney | ok ya ill fix that | |
| 19:59:19 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: ok https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/940838 should work i think | |
| 20:00:09 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: yup. looks good | |
| 20:00:23 | sean-k-mooney | ok ill recheck mikal patch then to get a run with that enabled | |
| 20:00:35 | sean-k-mooney | once i find the tab... | |
| 20:01:19 | sean-k-mooney | cool its running again | |
| 20:02:30 | gmann | thanks | |
| 20:03:18 | sean-k-mooney | 39 itmes in check, my guess is we will have results in about 3 hours, maybe 2 if we get lucky with ci capsity | |
| 20:04:28 | sean-k-mooney | mikal: feel free to recheck or update any or my patches as needed. ill proably finish in the ned 30 mins or so | |
| 20:47:45 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix verifying all the alloc requests from a multi-create https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/846786 | |
| 21:09:43 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: no worries, thanks yet again. | |