Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-02-04
16:25:31 sean-k-mooney oh ok stephn responded so rebuild is there btu show is still pending
16:25:42 gibi sean-k-mooney: yep that is my view
16:26:25 gibi ratailor: even if properties is a keyword for jsonschema we should have a way to have a schema that matches a field called properties :) but I have to load context and dig
16:26:49 sean-k-mooney ok ya looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/915743/8/nova/api/openstack/compute/schemas/servers.py that correct.
16:27:15 sean-k-mooney gibi: oh does it not like having a feild in the repsonce called properties
16:27:33 ratailor gibi, sure. Thanks! that would be helpful.
16:29:10 bauzas can we move on folks ?
16:29:14 sean-k-mooney yep
16:29:21 bauzas I think we agreed on the plan
16:29:32 sean-k-mooney we can pick this up on gerrit or after the meeting
16:29:36 bauzas we'll look where we are next week
16:29:46 bauzas cool
16:29:54 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:29:59 bauzas elodilles: welcome back
16:30:02 elodilles o/
16:30:06 elodilles #info nothing to report, stable gates seem to be healthy
16:30:13 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:30:19 elodilles that's all i got
16:32:18 bauzas thanks
16:32:24 bauzas moving on
16:32:33 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:32:40 bauzas fwiesel: hello
16:33:03 bauzas any news so far ?
16:33:06 fwiesel So, I fixed the "regression". As it turns out, I didn't clean properly up after each run in the network department, which eventually became too much.
16:33:41 fwiesel Looking at the past test runs, it looks fairly stable with the one know broken test.
16:33:43 bauzas bravo then
16:33:45 fwiesel That's from my side.
16:34:03 bauzas excellent news and thanks for the hard work on investigating the root cause and fixing it
16:34:26 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:34:47 bauzas I have one topic
16:35:04 r-taketn bauzas: I want to add one topic (request) , is it ok?
16:36:08 bauzas r-taketn: sure, I'm just grabbing some email link, sec
16:36:52 r-taketn I have another topic to mention from last week..
16:37:08 bauzas there we go
16:37:21 bauzas #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/3DBNNHXAPGVUX44NHH43WTDFMIDJ3X5U/
16:37:30 bauzas disabling the instance info caching
16:37:47 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I guess we can move forward and propose the patch, then ?
16:38:13 bauzas we said to look at the results this week
16:38:23 bauzas and the only person who replied was very happy with it
16:38:44 bauzas sean-k-mooney: so I guess you'll propose the instance info cache disabling patch
16:38:55 sean-k-mooney ah well the patch is already up
16:39:00 sean-k-mooney so we can proceed with the review
16:39:10 bauzas oh my bad you're right
16:39:13 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939476
16:39:29 bauzas I'll then proceed with the review
16:40:04 sean-k-mooney i have at least one typo to correct so ill respin it this evnnign or tomorrow
16:40:12 bauzas ++
16:40:14 bauzas cool
16:40:17 sean-k-mooney so if there are other comments ill try and adress those too
16:40:20 bauzas r-taketn: your turn then
16:40:46 r-taketn ok, i just added topic today's agenda.
16:40:56 r-taketn Request for replies on the following - About RDT/MPAM feature
16:41:04 r-taketn #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/HIKLBMNMTJR6GFPKFKODECMR56SYPT5J/
16:41:07 bauzas oh sorry
16:41:25 bauzas I removed it because I was thinking it was the topic we discussed last week
16:41:29 bauzas but indeed, this is different
16:42:00 r-taketn Yes. I have another topic to mention from last week.
16:42:08 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: the best way to move forward with that is to start a spec and bring it up to dicuss in the ptg
16:42:08 r-taketn I'm considering the feasibility of MPAM/RDT feature within OpenStack to solve noisy neighbor problems on VM clouds.
16:42:50 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: depending on how its mature it may be something that can be supproted
16:42:54 bauzas agreed
16:42:59 sean-k-mooney its a very invasive change
16:43:27 sean-k-mooney which is partly why the previous efforts were abandonded
16:44:18 r-taketn I intended to discuss the feasibility of this before submitting spec because its implementation will not be simple
16:44:18 bauzas r-taketn: the PTG dates are now known
16:44:33 bauzas r-taketn: would you be able to join us remotely ?
16:45:09 r-taketn sure.
16:45:20 bauzas cool thanks
16:45:29 bauzas then let's discuss this at the PTG
16:45:39 bauzas I need to create an etherpad for tracking those topics
16:45:43 sean-k-mooney r-taketn i was off on firday and yesterday so i have not fully read your latest post on this topic
16:45:53 sean-k-mooney ill see if i can do that later today
16:46:12 r-taketn sean-k-mooney: Thanks
16:46:58 r-taketn It's for confirming. Should I submit a spec before the PTG?
16:47:07 bauzas it would be nice
16:47:17 bauzas fwiw, I just created a PTG etherpad
16:47:20 sean-k-mooney it does not hurt to do so, it give use somethign concrete to dicuss
16:47:22 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg
16:47:38 bauzas r-taketn: could you please add your two topics at the bottom of that etherpad ?
16:47:49 r-taketn ok, i'll prepare
16:47:58 r-taketn bauzas: ok i'll add
16:48:00 bauzas the one we discuss last week and the other one from this week
16:48:09 bauzas r-taketn: thanks
16:48:17 bauzas I'll also add a couple of topics too
16:48:27 bauzas and I'll tell about the PTG etherpad next week
16:49:24 bauzas are we done for today?
16:49:27 masahito is it okay to start adding some topics on the etherpad?
16:49:34 MengyangZhang[m] I have a question. I was wondering if it is still possible to request an exception to add this bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=add-burst-length-support to Eproxy. The code change is minor and is ready for review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939490
16:49:37 masahito it's quick question.
16:49:46 sean-k-mooney r-taketn: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/662264 was the spec i wrote for RDT 5 years ago just an fyi.
16:50:03 bauzas masahito: yes indeed, you can add topics
16:50:14 masahito thanks.
16:50:14 sean-k-mooney MengyangZhang[m]: its very very late to do that
16:50:34 bauzas MengyangZhang[m]: yeah unfortunately, we're past approval freeze from 3 weeks now
16:50:42 bauzas and feature freeze is in 3 weeks too
16:51:18 bauzas the main reason why we have that approval freeze is for making sure we have enough capacity to review all the already approved ones
16:51:55 MengyangZhang[m] understood sorry i was away for two weeks, so i will need to resubmit it for 2025-02?
16:51:57 bauzas that wouldn't be fair to unprioritize some reviews by looking at some other patch, whatever big it is
16:52:06 r-taketn sean-k-mooney: thanks, and sorry, i have not checked it.
16:52:17 bauzas MengyangZhang[m]: unfortunately yes

Earlier   Later