| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-11-19 | |||
| 16:04:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:05:04 | bauzas | nothing about bugs ? | |
| 16:05:42 | bauzas | okay, let's move on | |
| 16:05:48 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney has proposed the fix for os-vif issue I raised last week | |
| 16:05:53 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/935653 | |
| 16:05:55 | bauzas | ah cool | |
| 16:06:02 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney++ | |
| 16:06:02 | tkajinam | if we can merge this quickly that would be nice | |
| 16:06:22 | bauzas | I'm not sure I can review that patch but I'll try | |
| 16:06:23 | tkajinam | I'll propose a new release of os-vif once that is merged to unblock bump of oslo.utils | |
| 16:06:57 | sean-k-mooney | i just bumpt the timeout for the retry loop | |
| 16:07:01 | sean-k-mooney | and made it configurable | |
| 16:07:12 | sean-k-mooney | the test only fails under high load | |
| 16:07:26 | sean-k-mooney | so the ohter way to fix itw as reduce concurancy but this seamed ok | |
| 16:07:41 | sean-k-mooney | if we have issues in the future ill reduce the concurancy instead | |
| 16:07:52 | bauzas | noted | |
| 16:09:12 | bauzas | ok moving on then | |
| 16:09:19 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:09:24 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:09:35 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:09:40 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:42 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:09:45 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:09:47 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Detect AMD SEV-ES support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925685 | |
| 16:09:55 | bauzas | all periodics are green | |
| 16:10:24 | bauzas | and fwiw, the CI seems in good shape, I was recently reviewing a lot of patches and I found no massive CI failures | |
| 16:10:29 | bauzas | anything else to mention ? | |
| 16:10:58 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_mem_encryption_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927706 | |
| 16:11:08 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Launch instances with SEV-ES memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926106 | |
| 16:12:20 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:12:28 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:33 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:38 | bauzas | #action bauzas to add Epoxy nova deadlines in the schedule | |
| 16:13:18 | sean-k-mooney | i have a minor request related to that | |
| 16:13:35 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: can we put the etherpad back in the topic? | |
| 16:13:35 | bauzas | shoot | |
| 16:13:47 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | in the channel topic ? | |
| 16:13:54 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:13:58 | bauzas | I can try but I don't have op rights AFAIK | |
| 16:14:13 | sean-k-mooney | ok i tought we had it there before but its fine | |
| 16:14:40 | sean-k-mooney | its in my browser history anyway but it can be nice for visiablity since we are using that as part of our release plannign/tracking | |
| 16:15:23 | sean-k-mooney | we can move on | |
| 16:15:26 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:15:56 | bauzas | I really need to provide the release patch to add the deadlines, as we told about a review round by mid-Dec | |
| 16:16:15 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:16:22 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status | |
| 16:16:34 | bauzas | I updated it with a few blueprints that got approved | |
| 16:16:40 | bauzas | but I still need to curate it | |
| 16:17:11 | tkajinam | gibi, looks like all patches for igb vif model have been merged ? | |
| 16:17:50 | gibi | tkajinam: yes indeed | |
| 16:17:56 | gibi | tkajinam: I marked the bp implemented | |
| 16:17:57 | tkajinam | (then we can move it to the upper section, just fyi) | |
| 16:17:59 | tkajinam | :-) | |
| 16:18:00 | bauzas | I'll curate that list | |
| 16:18:10 | bauzas | tkajinam: ack, will do | |
| 16:18:11 | gibi | I will update the etherpad... | |
| 16:18:40 | bauzas | done :) | |
| 16:18:42 | gibi | thanks bauzas | |
| 16:18:43 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:18:51 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:18:52 | gibi | you were like 0.5 sec faster to cuting it :) | |
| 16:18:59 | bauzas | elodilles: welcome back: ) | |
| 16:19:04 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:19:08 | elodilles | #info stable/202*.* gates seem to be OK | |
| 16:19:11 | bauzas | gibi: I'm closer to my keyboard than you :p | |
| 16:19:16 | elodilles | unmaintained/2023.1 was cut already and now stable/2023.1 is deleted, too | |
| 16:19:24 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:19:29 | elodilles | #info stable/2024.2, stable/2024.1 and stable/2023.2 are the maintained branches from now on | |
| 16:19:45 | elodilles | for nova :) | |
| 16:19:57 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:20:10 | elodilles | and that's all from me about stable branches | |
| 16:21:25 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:21:41 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:21:47 | bauzas | fwiesel: available ? | |
| 16:21:48 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:21:55 | fwiesel | Hi, no update from my side. | |
| 16:22:00 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:22:07 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:22:13 | bauzas | there was one item in the agenda | |
| 16:22:21 | bauzas | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/allow-scp-ip-operations (s3rj1k) | |
| 16:22:26 | bauzas | s3rj1k: around ? | |
| 16:22:34 | s3rj1k | here | |
| 16:23:04 | s3rj1k | I think this one is obsolete, as revert mentioned in comments works fine | |
| 16:23:17 | sean-k-mooney | s3rj1k: so that should not be needed after our testing last week correct if we land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909122 | |
| 16:23:35 | s3rj1k | sean-k-mooney: yes | |
| 16:23:52 | sean-k-mooney | then i would like to ask for another core to review ^ | |
| 16:24:01 | bauzas | ah cok | |
| 16:24:03 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:24:08 | s3rj1k | I think we did not update agenda page from last week :) | |
| 16:24:08 | bauzas | then moving on | |
| 16:24:11 | sean-k-mooney | and elodilles it would be nice if you could weigh in on if you think that is backportable | |
| 16:24:26 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ACK, will check that | |
| 16:24:31 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: you had one thing to discuss | |
| 16:24:54 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: yes. i would like to add ralonsoh to the os-vif core team | |
| 16:25:39 | sean-k-mooney | rodolfo has helpped maintained that repo on and off over the years and as a neuton core they have an invested interest in keeping it helaty as they also consume it | |
| 16:26:07 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/c113c882e5906f1b4ec806509ae59f0d363375c0,members | |
| 16:26:27 | sean-k-mooney | with watcher takeing some of my time ill have a little less time to look at issue in os-vif and i thikn they choudl be a good addtion to that team | |
| 16:26:39 | gibi | having a neutron core on the os-vif core team is not a bad idea | |