Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-10-25
09:41:15 pas-ha[m] then you will get 16 extra PCI devices for this card, those are VFs for SR-IOV, you will create the MIGs on them and pass these VF PCI devices to the VMs.
09:52:10 bauzas r-taketn: sorrry was in a meeting
09:52:28 bauzas MIG-mode is somehow doable with Nova
09:52:42 bauzas but you need to pre-create the GIs
09:53:07 bauzas as pas-ha[m] said, you also need to pre-create the VFs
09:53:41 bauzas once you create the graphical instances, you should be able to use the related mdevs
09:55:22 bauzas please read https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/5.1/user-guide/index.html#configuring-vgpu-manager-linux-with-kvm for how to enable VFs and GIs
09:56:08 bauzas for MIG, this is a bit later in the nvidia doc : https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/5.1/user-guide/index.html#configuring-a-gpu-for-mig-backed-vgpus
10:00:52 r-taketn pas-ha[m], bauzas: I already created GIs. Sorry, I didn't understand mdev types and VFs. So I try to enable SR-IOV and create the VFs. Thanks.
10:32:29 r-taketn bauzas, pas-ha: I cannot find /usr/lib/nvidia/sriov-manage on my environment. https://docs.nvidia.com/ai-enterprise/5.1/user-guide/index.html#preparing-virtual-function-for-sr-iov-vgpu shows that Use only the custom script sriov-manage provided by NVIDIA AI Enterprise for the purpose.
10:33:25 pas-ha[m] yes, as I said, to properly use MIG you need AI Enterprise drivers...
10:35:47 r-taketn I got it. thank you for good advices
10:38:28 frickler sean-k-mooney: tested your eventlet fix and now it seems to hang somewhere, but I'm not sure which test is actually getting stuck https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/dde58528ed9841f4b21d0091750fa176
10:39:02 frickler at least the functional job is passing now
10:39:15 sean-k-mooney so thats the unit test job
10:39:27 sean-k-mooney and i only changed form assert_called_once to assert_called
10:39:42 sean-k-mooney so that not related to the change its somethign deeper
10:40:54 sean-k-mooney frickler: lookign at the logs the tests were still running and passing form what i can see
10:40:58 sean-k-mooney and we just hit the timeout
10:43:00 sean-k-mooney frickler: im not seing anything hang in the logs or even tak a large amoutn of time
10:46:31 sean-k-mooney it took about 3 mins to get to the poitn of runnign tox which does not seem exceeive 4.5 total to run the first test
10:47:20 sean-k-mooney oh i see
10:47:22 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/dde58528ed9841f4b21d0091750fa176/log/job-output.txt#33835-33836
10:47:36 sean-k-mooney the absence of logs it just stopped making progress
10:48:15 sean-k-mooney i could just turn off os monkey patching as well
10:48:57 sean-k-mooney what im most concerned about by the way is this breaking oru syncronise decorator
10:49:06 sean-k-mooney or something like that
12:20:37 sean-k-mooney bauzas: so last firday, contractors were ment to come and do a solar site survay, they called in sick and it was reschduled for the top of the hour today. so i might miss part of the start of the ptg sessions
12:26:25 bauzas sean-k-mooney: ack np, we're already mostly done with the agenda :)
12:26:46 sean-k-mooney i have already left most of my feedback anyway
12:26:58 sean-k-mooney but i was actully expecting use to get throught he adgenda yesterday
12:27:15 sean-k-mooney hopefully that mean we can wrap up nova before the tc sessions
12:27:30 bauzas yup :)
12:27:42 bauzas I also need to attend the TC sessions :)
12:28:07 sean-k-mooney i do not need too but it would be nice ot have the option
13:01:44 bauzas stephenfin: do you want to join us in the PTG for your topic ?
13:01:56 bauzas we will discuss it around the next hour
13:29:11 MengyangZhang[m] <tkajinam> "you can put your topic at the..." <- so my topic was already discussed yesterday? I thought it would be discussed on Friday.
13:30:14 tkajinam MengyangZhang[m], we had cross project session between nova and cinder and that topic was raised during that discussion. nova team asked cinder team to double check if the proposal is valid or not from cinder's PoV
13:30:32 tkajinam MengyangZhang[m], if you have anything else you want to specifically discuss then you can re-add it to the topic for today, probably
13:30:34 tkajinam bauzas, ^^^
13:31:01 tkajinam sorry I'm now in oceanbase discussion. I didn't plan it but noone form oslo was there
13:32:54 MengyangZhang[m] tkajinam: then I guess we are all good. If you need anything from me, please let me know
13:35:48 MengyangZhang[m] MengyangZhang[m]: I also have the implementation ready if it helps the community understand the scope of the problem.
14:02:12 sean-k-mooney MengyangZhang[m]: the main opens we have is jsut are all the qos polices you want to enabel already valid and part of cinder
14:02:49 sean-k-mooney MengyangZhang[m]: nova cant enabel any front end qos for cinder voluems unless the cinder team has already enabled support for it in there api
14:03:17 sean-k-mooney if its not supported on the cinder side today you need to first enabel it there and then in nova
14:05:45 tkajinam re-reviewing the spec it says that we register these specs in cinder but actually applies the limit in nova. I don't think that's something already done
14:05:59 tkajinam we have quota:disk_write_bytes_sec but it's set for nova flavor
14:09:47 tkajinam I probably have to check if cinder exposes any qos elements in connection info
14:13:14 artom Coming late because of baby's doctor appointment - is PTG finished?
14:13:37 artom Sounds like we ended with the OpenAPI topic
14:19:14 tkajinam so I reminded bauzas of taking a team photo this afternoon but missed the chance to be part of it X-(
14:19:19 tkajinam (hoping he took one
14:34:58 gibi tkajinam: at least he did not take it openly:)
14:35:18 gibi artom: yepp we finished with the nova agenda. There is two tc sessions left
14:55:42 stephenfin bauzas: sean-k-mooney: fyi, the spec has already been re-proposed and merged :) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928800
14:56:19 stephenfin sorry, I wasn't checking IRC :(
16:50:17 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test with latest oslo.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933444
17:01:50 tkajinam long day, long week
17:02:59 sean-k-mooney yep
17:03:04 sean-k-mooney but productive i think
17:03:12 tkajinam yeah
17:03:22 sean-k-mooney less so then in person but still we used the time well i think
17:04:09 tkajinam yeah I think we have adopted a lot to the current vPTG style
17:04:12 gibi I agree, we had good discussions with actionable outcomes
17:04:30 sean-k-mooney one of my friends remined me its a public holiday in ireland on monday. so im looking forward to the long weekend
17:04:51 sean-k-mooney gibi: by the wya im hoping ti finish reviewing the igb series before i finish today
17:05:43 gibi sean-k-mooney: if not, it is not a problem at all
17:06:01 sean-k-mooney im on the second last change so that and the docs one
17:06:05 gibi :)
17:06:06 sean-k-mooney sofar looks good to me
17:07:03 tkajinam leaving now. have a good weekend
17:07:23 gibi tkajinam: same to you
#openstack-nova - 2024-10-26
00:41:08 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP][scheduler] add hash based weigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933478
00:48:37 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP][scheduler] add hash based weigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933478
06:01:30 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update api-ref for 2.95: evacuate to STOPPED https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/916596
06:07:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Adding sysctl changes for post-copy migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908201
#openstack-nova - 2024-10-29
07:50:06 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks for the reviews on https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/igb-vif-model%22
07:51:11 gibi bauzas, melwitt, dansmith : can some of you be the second core on ^^ I promise it is simple :)
08:25:23 bauzas shit, "Your message to openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org awaits moderator approval"
08:25:50 bauzas because "The message is larger than the 40 KB maximum size"
08:26:05 bauzas gibi: sure, looking
08:26:59 bauzas okay, I'll prioritize your series review this morning
08:54:40 frickler bauzas: is this intentionally large message or html by accident. I can look into approving it if needed unless you want to wait for fungi to be back
08:55:22 bauzas frickler: I attached a txt file, hence the message size
08:55:56 bauzas do you want me to send again the message without the etherpas backup file ?
08:56:01 bauzas etherpad*
08:59:32 frickler bauzas: linking to the etherpad should be enough I guess?
09:06:33 bauzas frickler: I always do that by linking to an etherpad readonly copy, but this time I also attached the file backup
09:15:03 frickler bauzas: ok, so let me just try to approve your message, then, so you don't need to resend
09:15:17 bauzas frickler: wait
09:15:17 frickler oh, wait, you just did
09:15:33 bauzas yeah I just sent it again without the attached file
09:16:59 frickler ok, then I'll try to drop the other mail instead to avoid ending up on the list as duplicate
09:27:41 frickler hmm, I didn't manage to do that, will need some advice from fungi who'll hopefully read this before picking up moderation chores
09:27:49 bauzas ++
10:06:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [doc]Add `socket` option to [pci]alias numa_policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933636
10:06:58 gibi sean-k-mooney, bauzas: a small doc bug fix ^^
10:47:42 fungi frickler: bauzas: sure, i can discard the larger duplicate, but the moderation hold notice you received should have also included instructions on how to cancel your own post instead

Earlier   Later