| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-09 | |||
| 18:15:27 | mnaser | such as `avx512f` etc | |
| 18:16:26 | JayF | they are different | |
| 18:16:31 | JayF | like, that's accurate, isn't it? | |
| 19:20:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.97 to add image_type to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930968 | |
| 19:20:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Add image multi-backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930967 | |
| 19:42:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Support creating servers with RBAC SGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-10 | |||
| 00:53:03 | sean-k-mooney[m] | testing via thunderbird | |
| 00:53:14 | sean-k-mooney | seams to work | |
| 02:42:09 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926522 | |
| 02:42:10 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926524 | |
| 02:42:10 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: zvm: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926523 | |
| 08:34:22 | semantic | Hello! Could someone please look into https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931737 ? | |
| 08:51:48 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend DB model add a unique constraint. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/912518 | |
| 08:51:48 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend ShareMappingStatus due to asynchronous call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908864 | |
| 08:51:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Use client token when talking to manila https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925277 | |
| 08:51:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194 | |
| 08:51:50 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075 | |
| 08:51:50 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090 | |
| 08:51:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500 | |
| 08:51:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881472 | |
| 08:51:52 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823 | |
| 08:51:53 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284 | |
| 08:51:53 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824 | |
| 08:51:55 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286 | |
| 08:51:55 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285 | |
| 08:51:57 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883862 | |
| 08:51:57 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287 | |
| 08:51:59 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830 | |
| 08:51:59 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (compute manager) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885751 | |
| 08:52:01 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501 | |
| 08:52:01 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885753 | |
| 08:52:03 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029 | |
| 08:52:03 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028 | |
| 08:52:05 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283 | |
| 08:52:05 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282 | |
| 08:52:07 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086 | |
| 08:52:07 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reports instance events to the DB regarding attaching and detaching a share https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927088 | |
| 08:52:09 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Manila shares admin guide documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642 | |
| 08:52:09 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087 | |
| 11:41:41 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Replace neutronclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/932057 | |
| 11:46:41 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Replace neutronclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/932057 | |
| 12:38:30 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: repoduce post liberty pre vicoria instance numa db issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932064 | |
| 12:38:58 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: allow upgrade of pre-victoria InstanceNUMACells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932065 | |
| 12:41:50 | sean-k-mooney1 | elodilles: ^ you have some downstream victoria clouds right. that would technially be useful for them but im hoping you dont have downstream pre victoria clouds that have nto upgraded to at least victoira so it might now be relevent anymore | |
| 12:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | given how old that bug is and that it does not afffect any isntance after victoria im not very motivated to backport this upstream but just wanted to highlight it to you in case it was useful to you | |
| 12:44:38 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: i think you are the 4th person to start replacing neutron clinet with the sdk if you have that working your amazing if you dont i guess that makes you human but still pretty awsome | |
| 12:45:01 | sean-k-mooney | oh your patches are for nova-client not nova | |
| 12:45:24 | sean-k-mooney | still nice to see although im hoping we can remove nova-client in the next 1-2 years entirly | |
| 12:46:04 | tkajinam | I'm not really touching "kill clients" so far but I know it may give me a lot of thing to do in heat :-P | |
| 12:46:07 | sean-k-mooney | it would be nice to start the converstaion "can we formally deprecate the python binding in 2025.1, for removal in 2026.1" | |
| 12:46:38 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: i know neutorn want to kill there client in the next 1-2 slurps and i think we should try to do the same | |
| 12:46:55 | sean-k-mooney | but ya it wont happen for a while | |
| 12:47:26 | tkajinam | I understand that point but honestly I'm not too sure about its feasibility | |
| 12:47:47 | tkajinam | for the past 1 year I'm almost the only person taking care of all heat repos. | |
| 12:47:57 | sean-k-mooney | well the only reaosn we didnt freeze the python bidnign before last cycle was osc | |
| 12:48:17 | sean-k-mooney | that is no longer a usecase as osc is now using the sdk | |
| 12:48:30 | tkajinam | ok | |
| 12:48:53 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont realy expect use to continue to extend the python binding in nova-clinet anymore for new api. just the sdk | |
| 12:48:58 | tkajinam | I'm ok to freeze the client code now. I may need some more time before it is actually retired. | |
| 12:49:10 | tkajinam | following what was done for neutronclient in the past | |
| 12:52:23 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ACK, thanks, i'll review and see if i can backport :) maybe it can help others :] | |
| 12:54:10 | tkajinam | as we expect some big changes needed for eventlet removal and py313 support I'm hoping that we don't add yet another big topic for a few cycles | |
| 12:54:34 | tkajinam | that's my own hope but people may want more short timeline for different things. | |
| 12:56:57 | sean-k-mooney | well the move to sdk started before the eventlet topic | |
| 12:57:06 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we will see how things pan out. | |
| 12:57:29 | sean-k-mooney | i know we are all pretty streched so we dont want to break things just for the sake of it | |
| 12:57:57 | sean-k-mooney | what i would hope however is that heat for example could elelct to only use the sdk for new apis to not accure new tech debt | |
| 12:58:17 | sean-k-mooney | even if it does not start the removal of the old client code in the near term | |
| 13:02:11 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: alot of our downstream customer are startign to jump form train to wallaby so that bug is now finally manafesting. out side of enterpise distrobutions i would not expect many clouds to really be running pre victoira code today | |
| 13:03:42 | elodilles | well, we always see really old versions when community asks around about used versions in deployments, so who knows | |
| 13:03:54 | sean-k-mooney | because of hardware age reasons many of our custoemr using wallaby before did fresh installs on new hardware instead of upgrading so this only came up now after 4 years. | |
| 13:04:54 | sean-k-mooney | ya i mean it happens, compaines deploy a cloud, it works well enough for there needed and dont upgrade it because of small teams and then they realsie they are massivly out of date with no clear way to catch up | |
| 13:05:03 | elodilles | that's true, though, probably new install is easier for many operators | |
| 22:55:26 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/os-traits master: DNM trait https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/932152 | |
| 23:02:18 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.97 to add image_type to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930968 | |
| 23:02:19 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP trait, filter, request spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932153 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-10-11 | |||
| 00:20:27 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP trait, filter, request spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932153 | |
| 04:51:20 | opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/929719 | |
| 12:03:41 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: have you tought about a new api to deiscover which iamge backend are supproted on a give cloud, also i woudl expect to want to be able to also set ad default image backed in the falvor or image | |
| 12:04:47 | sean-k-mooney | doing it via the bdms is fine for advanced users but im not sure how good the ux is in general | |
| 12:07:14 | sean-k-mooney | i have a few other tought on "nice to have" capablity that could be part of this work like adding "on_shared_storage=True/false" to server show or maping strage backends to placment aggreates to ensure we can schdule to the same storage pool when an isntnace is on shared storage | |
| 12:07:59 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if you have tought about any of those elements in https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22nova-imagebackend-poc%22 | |
| 13:57:00 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yeah I don't love using BDMs for that either, but it's probably the vehicle we need for being able to express that we want to be root-on-shared and ephemeral-on-local | |
| 13:57:16 | dansmith | I think probably the reason I don't like it is because I don't like BDMs in the first place | |
| 13:57:32 | dansmith | they're just obscure and opaque and I have to look up how to use them every time I need to | |
| 13:57:46 | sean-k-mooney | well having this in the bdm makes sense. havign that as the only wya ot express it is another matter | |
| 13:58:27 | sean-k-mooney | i was more or less thinking of having the ablity to default it via the flavor or image and if you want diffent backends per disk then overried with bdm | |
| 13:58:59 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. hw:root_image_backed=rbd hw:ephmeral_image_backend=lvm | |
| 13:59:10 | sean-k-mooney | and if you need something more complex only then go to bdm | |
| 13:59:18 | dansmith | yeah I read what you said.. and maybe, but the user really shouldn't even know that lvm or rbd are in use | |
| 13:59:56 | sean-k-mooney | well it may be approaty if we have an api for listing the types. | |
| 14:00:04 | sean-k-mooney | but without that i agree | |
| 14:00:35 | sean-k-mooney | we could also have an abstration i.e. hw:root_image_backed=local|shared_storage | |
| 14:00:44 | sean-k-mooney | that would be more cloudy | |
| 14:00:59 | sean-k-mooney | and offten that asll you care about | |
| 14:01:20 | dansmith | yeah, I think enumerated types (like volume types) is the thing we need.. shared/local isn't enough, IMHO | |
| 14:01:55 | dansmith | because if someone wants local cheap slow file-on-disk, faster lvm, shared rbd, shared iscsi box, etc | |
| 14:46:20 | jlejeune | hello, do you know where can I find the mysql/mariadb compatible versions depending on the openstack releases ? is there a compatibility matrix somewhere ? | |
| 14:50:14 | jlejeune | because I have issue when I want to upgrade from bobcat to caracal, when 'nova-manage db sync' tries to create nova_cell0.share_mapping table on mariadb 11.5.2 | |
| 15:30:05 | jlejeune | it seems to be related to the charset | |