Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-10-09
10:05:49 bauzas zigo: I was half-joking, half-serious
10:06:12 bauzas the problem is that I haven't heard anyone wanting to work on it
10:06:29 bauzas and my personal amount of time for that is... well, I won't say
10:06:33 zigo Most of my OpenStack commits are Python minor release fixups. :)
10:07:00 bauzas zigo: you can at least add that topic in the PTG etherpad
10:07:11 bauzas I'll ensure we discuss that at the PTG
10:07:23 zigo URL of the etherpad?
10:07:36 bauzas that's in the ptg link but I can give you
10:07:53 bauzas https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-ptg
10:08:20 zigo I'll be on holidays during the PTG ... :/
10:08:26 zigo (going to Malaga...)
10:09:38 bauzas no worries then I'll proxy that topic
11:00:32 gibi haleyb: I have a quick question in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521 h
11:50:36 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Remove unused sphinx deps https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931906
13:43:04 haleyb gibi: thanks for the review. i responded and sean-k-mooney did as well, can move forward based on responses
13:48:20 gibi looking
13:49:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Remove unused sphinx deps https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931906
13:54:03 gibi responded
14:12:11 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Handle iso+gpt detections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931833
14:30:39 haleyb gibi: looking, just having to swap-in my memory of that change since it's been a while
14:35:54 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Support creating servers with RBAC SGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521
14:44:16 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Replace cinderclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/931961
15:28:56 haleyb gibi: updated it, thanks for the review
15:32:18 gibi haleyb: +2 thanks for the respin
16:39:25 sean-k-mooney haleyb: gibi +2w
18:13:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.97 to add image_type to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930968
18:13:33 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Add image multi-backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930967
18:15:01 mnaser has anyone seen an issue where using cpu_mode=host-model
18:15:16 mnaser zen3 vs zen4 nodes showing different cpu flags
18:15:27 mnaser such as `avx512f` etc
18:16:26 JayF they are different
18:16:31 JayF like, that's accurate, isn't it?
19:20:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion 2.97 to add image_type to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930968
19:20:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: Add image multi-backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930967
19:42:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Support creating servers with RBAC SGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521
#openstack-nova - 2024-10-10
00:53:03 sean-k-mooney[m] testing via thunderbird
00:53:14 sean-k-mooney seams to work
02:42:09 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: VMware: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926522
02:42:10 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926524
02:42:10 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: zvm: updates resource provider trait list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/926523
08:34:22 semantic Hello! Could someone please look into https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/931737 ?
08:51:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend DB model add a unique constraint. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/912518
08:51:48 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend ShareMappingStatus due to asynchronous call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908864
08:51:49 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Use client token when talking to manila https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925277
08:51:49 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
08:51:50 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075
08:51:50 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
08:51:51 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
08:51:51 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881472
08:51:52 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823
08:51:53 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284
08:51:53 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824
08:51:55 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286
08:51:55 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285
08:51:57 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883862
08:51:57 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287
08:51:59 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
08:51:59 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (compute manager) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885751
08:52:01 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
08:52:01 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885753
08:52:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
08:52:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
08:52:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283
08:52:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282
08:52:07 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086
08:52:07 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reports instance events to the DB regarding attaching and detaching a share https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927088
08:52:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Manila shares admin guide documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642
08:52:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
11:41:41 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Replace neutronclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/932057
11:46:41 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Replace neutronclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/932057
12:38:30 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: repoduce post liberty pre vicoria instance numa db issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932064
12:38:58 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: allow upgrade of pre-victoria InstanceNUMACells https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/932065
12:41:50 sean-k-mooney1 elodilles: ^ you have some downstream victoria clouds right. that would technially be useful for them but im hoping you dont have downstream pre victoria clouds that have nto upgraded to at least victoira so it might now be relevent anymore
12:43:11 sean-k-mooney given how old that bug is and that it does not afffect any isntance after victoria im not very motivated to backport this upstream but just wanted to highlight it to you in case it was useful to you
12:44:38 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: i think you are the 4th person to start replacing neutron clinet with the sdk if you have that working your amazing if you dont i guess that makes you human but still pretty awsome
12:45:01 sean-k-mooney oh your patches are for nova-client not nova
12:45:24 sean-k-mooney still nice to see although im hoping we can remove nova-client in the next 1-2 years entirly
12:46:04 tkajinam I'm not really touching "kill clients" so far but I know it may give me a lot of thing to do in heat :-P
12:46:07 sean-k-mooney it would be nice to start the converstaion "can we formally deprecate the python binding in 2025.1, for removal in 2026.1"
12:46:38 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: i know neutorn want to kill there client in the next 1-2 slurps and i think we should try to do the same
12:46:55 sean-k-mooney but ya it wont happen for a while
12:47:26 tkajinam I understand that point but honestly I'm not too sure about its feasibility
12:47:47 tkajinam for the past 1 year I'm almost the only person taking care of all heat repos.
12:47:57 sean-k-mooney well the only reaosn we didnt freeze the python bidnign before last cycle was osc
12:48:17 sean-k-mooney that is no longer a usecase as osc is now using the sdk
12:48:30 tkajinam ok
12:48:53 sean-k-mooney so i dont realy expect use to continue to extend the python binding in nova-clinet anymore for new api. just the sdk
12:48:58 tkajinam I'm ok to freeze the client code now. I may need some more time before it is actually retired.
12:49:10 tkajinam following what was done for neutronclient in the past
12:52:23 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ACK, thanks, i'll review and see if i can backport :) maybe it can help others :]
12:54:10 tkajinam as we expect some big changes needed for eventlet removal and py313 support I'm hoping that we don't add yet another big topic for a few cycles
12:54:34 tkajinam that's my own hope but people may want more short timeline for different things.
12:56:57 sean-k-mooney well the move to sdk started before the eventlet topic
12:57:06 sean-k-mooney but ya we will see how things pan out.
12:57:29 sean-k-mooney i know we are all pretty streched so we dont want to break things just for the sake of it
12:57:57 sean-k-mooney what i would hope however is that heat for example could elelct to only use the sdk for new apis to not accure new tech debt
12:58:17 sean-k-mooney even if it does not start the removal of the old client code in the near term
13:02:11 sean-k-mooney elodilles: alot of our downstream customer are startign to jump form train to wallaby so that bug is now finally manafesting. out side of enterpise distrobutions i would not expect many clouds to really be running pre victoira code today
13:03:42 elodilles well, we always see really old versions when community asks around about used versions in deployments, so who knows
13:03:54 sean-k-mooney because of hardware age reasons many of our custoemr using wallaby before did fresh installs on new hardware instead of upgrading so this only came up now after 4 years.

Earlier   Later