Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-09-24
08:32:25 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reports instance events to the DB regarding attaching and detaching a share https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927088
08:32:27 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642
08:32:27 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
10:52:40 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Remove Python 3.8 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/925648
11:32:36 zhhuabj hi pas-ha[m] sean-k-mooney[m] we're really keen to see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909611 move forward and would like to know if there is anything we can do to help? it seems like it is now in final version and ready for review but has not had any in a while I understand it might have held up due to the raft of recent cves but hopefully that is now behind us and we are in a good position to move forward with this?
11:35:02 sean-k-mooney[m] that work stalled because we have a critical severity CVE related to image handleing in multiple openstack services
11:36:21 sean-k-mooney[m] as part of that 2 things were discovered, first iso work provided the iso is bootable when written to a block device, we can revert to using the cdrom device type to support iso that dont support that but thats why it was not noticed orginally
11:37:09 sean-k-mooney[m] the other thing that was discovered is the cve fix broke ISOs entirely :) that has now been fixed with the addtion of an iso format inspector
11:37:42 sean-k-mooney[m] we could revisit that not that the cve issues are resolved
11:37:47 sean-k-mooney[m] *now
11:49:01 sean-k-mooney[m] zhhuabj: im on pto this week but if you have tested this patch it would be comment to that effect. im partly concerned about regressing exisitng instances that are using iso as only a subset of isos are currently broken
11:49:39 sean-k-mooney[m] we need to be careful to not regress exising working isos while eneabling the old behvior
12:06:42 zhhuabj hi sean-k-mooney[m] , actually I tested this patch previously, and it worked well. Unfortunately, I didn't leave any records at that time. I will continue to do some testing and report back with the results. sean, thank you very much, and enjoy your pto.
12:15:05 opendevreview Biser Milanov proposed openstack/nova master: StorPool: Pass the instance UUID to os-brick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930297
12:32:02 opendevreview Samuel Kunkel proposed openstack/nova master: increase num of pcie ports in libvirt conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930301
12:32:58 opendevreview Samuel Kunkel proposed openstack/nova master: increase num of pcie ports in libvirt conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930301
12:34:04 opendevreview Samuel Kunkel proposed openstack/nova master: increase num of pcie ports in libvirt conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930301
12:35:09 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for showing finish_time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928933
12:53:51 pas-ha[m] zhhuabj: I plan to test some more this week as well, with various ISOs as Sean mentioned that there's a difference between older and newer ISOs (EFI vs pure ISO?..) the newer ones were seemingly working properly w/o my patch, so we need to make sure we do not break them
12:56:05 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Show finish_time field in instance action show https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/929780
13:11:55 whoami-rajat hey #openstack-nova , can anyone take a look at this patch? it's part of an effort started 2 years ago and nova side changes are only remaining
13:12:01 whoami-rajat #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849328
13:22:49 zhhuabj pas-ha[m], that’s a great idea, thanks for the update
13:27:22 gibi whoami-rajat: do you have a bp / bug tracking this work? cc'jj bauzas
13:28:41 bauzas yeah, that's a valid concern, I see a relnote describing the new feature
13:33:20 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce anti-affinity race condition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930326
13:59:42 frickler gibi: sean-k-mooney[m]: https://github.com/cirros-dev/cirros/pull/122 can you check if that looks like what you'd want to have? once the builds finish you could also download the resulting image and test it
14:02:06 whoami-rajat gibi, bauzas we don't have a LP now, I talked to Gorka (the original author) about it and he said he can file a LP bug, would that be good to get the change in?
14:36:44 gibi frickler: thanks lot. I will grab the image and test is later today
14:37:21 gibi whoami-rajat: I think a bug is enough but I defer to bauzas :)
15:11:27 bauzas gibi: whoami-rajat: I don't like to play the lawyer's role but Gorka wrote 'features:' in the relnote :D
15:11:48 bauzas and that is not intended to be backported
15:13:40 gibi (I knew I need to defer :D)
15:13:47 gibi bauzas: specless bp then?
15:21:35 bauzas cool
15:22:21 gibi whoami-rajat: could you open a bp in launchpad and put it on the nova meeting's agenda for a quick approval?
15:31:43 whoami-rajat gibi, bauzas so this was a feature when it was introduced, now it's more of a bug in nova and when os-brick removes the compatibility layer, nova is going to break, i feel a bug would be more appropriate at this point? maybe we can change the releasenote to say it's a bugfix?
15:32:43 bauzas whoami-rajat: okay, then bug report this is
15:34:20 whoami-rajat thanks!
15:34:55 gibi OK
15:44:08 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce anti-affinity race condition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930326
15:47:11 opendevreview Maxime Lubin proposed openstack/nova master: console-proxy: add option to use ``nova-conductor`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/930355
15:53:36 bauzas reminder: nova meeting in 7 mins
15:53:42 bauzas and I need to write the agenda...
16:00:20 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:20 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:20 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 24 16:00:20 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:20 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:30 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:33 bauzas hey folks
16:00:42 elodilles o/
16:00:57 tkajinam o/
16:01:00 Uggla o/
16:01:10 gibi o/
16:01:41 bauzas I guess we can softly start
16:01:54 auniyal o/
16:01:56 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:01 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:02:05 bauzas (huzzah)
16:02:11 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:02:21 bauzas any critical bug you'd like to raise ?
16:02:38 bauzas we're btw. on RC stage, which means that any regression is important
16:02:50 bauzas if you found one, please raise
16:03:59 bauzas apparently not
16:04:02 bauzas moving on then
16:04:10 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:04:17 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:04:22 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:04:29 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:04:41 bauzas the nova-emulation job failed on master
16:04:58 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/2f16f1f9ff5d4f0c9bae021f54cd5d27
16:05:14 gibi that is failing pretty frequently as far as I remember
16:05:31 bauzas the nova-emulation job failing ? yeah
16:05:40 bauzas but in general that's on the stable branches
16:05:54 bauzas this time, looks like the periodic run got the kernel panic problem
16:06:11 bauzas oh wait no
16:06:17 bauzas they never got the DHCP lease
16:06:59 gibi the emulaton job is shaky on master too https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&project=openstack/nova
16:07:04 bauzas hopefully a race condition, but that kind of error was there a while ago
16:07:09 bauzas https://220ad47fc85766504430-165a16385c4a60267b84fdc053ee074d.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/periodic-weekly/opendev.org/openstack/nova/master/nova-emulation/2f16f1f/testr_results.html
16:07:19 gibi https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&skip=0
16:07:31 bauzas the ssh connection failed because the instance never got the DHCP lease in time
16:08:17 bauzas anyway, I propose we defer the discussion to next week if the periodic fails again on master
16:08:25 gibi anyhow I don't see a repeating pattern in the failed jobs
16:08:41 gibi so I guess it is general instability not a regression
16:08:44 bauzas yup, that's why I feel the job acting more like a canary
16:09:47 bauzas so, can we move on or is anyone wanting to say more ?
16:09:54 opendevreview Gorka Eguileor proposed openstack/nova master: Support os-brick specific lock_path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849328
16:10:40 bauzas looks so
16:10:47 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:10:52 bauzas #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck
16:10:58 tkajinam in case you haven't seen it... osc was bumped again and now 7.1.2 is supposed to be used in gate
16:10:59 tkajinam https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/929938
16:11:11 bauzas yup, I saw the lift
16:11:20 tkajinam in case you see that causes any problems then report it asap
16:11:38 bauzas ack
16:11:39 tkajinam I'm not aware of any, so far
16:12:02 tkajinam that's all from me :-)
16:12:04 bauzas ditto here, I haven't checked whether we merged stuff, but the CI jobs sound correct
16:12:21 bauzas thanks tkajinam for the note, btw.

Earlier   Later