| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-10 | |||
| 13:41:30 | stephenfin | gibi: Yeah, there was probably too much there to be done in one cycle. However, we are at a clear boundary in so far as we have everything else *except* the response body schemas in place now | |
| 13:41:55 | stephenfin | How do we approach that normally, where we have something tangible done in one cycle but more to be done the next cycle? | |
| 13:42:04 | bauzas | and I hope to do reviews of part-2 myself :) | |
| 13:42:16 | gibi | stephenfin: I think having a part-2 bp is OK | |
| 13:42:30 | bauzas | stephenfin: exactly like what we agreed : provide a part-2 and explain what's missing | |
| 13:42:39 | gibi | but I would like to see a note in the D spec stating what was done in D from the original scope | |
| 13:42:50 | bauzas | sounds fine to me | |
| 13:44:08 | gibi | I would like to end up with a history in the specs like this https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.1/implemented/pci-device-tracking-in-placement.html#history | |
| 13:44:54 | gibi | also an example note from the zed spec https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/zed/approved/pci-device-tracking-in-placement.html#scheduling | |
| 13:45:01 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Create specs directory for 2025.1 Epoxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924227 | |
| 13:54:16 | stephenfin | gibi: So I note the zed spec is still in approved rather than implemented? I assume we'll do that same for my spec in dalmation? | |
| 13:55:42 | bauzas | stephenfin: I said it was implemented | |
| 13:55:53 | bauzas | you'll just recreate a part-2 blueprint | |
| 13:55:56 | stephenfin | ack | |
| 13:56:01 | bauzas | and another spec file | |
| 13:56:55 | bauzas | stephenfin: tbh, our numbers aren't good, I'm quite on the side to basically see the half-full glass now than half-empty :) | |
| 13:57:32 | bauzas | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/2024.2 is terrible to see | |
| 14:01:34 | sean-k-mooney | thats hardly surprising if your paying attention to how thing were progressing | |
| 14:03:35 | sean-k-mooney | 3 of the 6 that were implemented would not have been if i didnt explictly go looking for reveiews on behalf of the contibutor | |
| 14:04:24 | zigo | sean-k-mooney: What's the status of the virtio driver for Manila, do you know? Is it done in Dalmatian?!? | |
| 14:04:31 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose OpenAPI spec for Epoxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928800 | |
| 14:04:39 | stephenfin | gibi: bauzas: ^ | |
| 14:04:59 | sean-k-mooney | zigo: no, unfortuetly, we think all of the blocker are now resloved for it to be in 2025.1 | |
| 14:05:10 | zigo | Ok, thanks. | |
| 14:05:11 | sean-k-mooney | but there were some issues with the sdk and how we were doing auth | |
| 14:05:20 | sean-k-mooney | and with locking on the manila side | |
| 14:05:37 | zigo | So, wont be in Debian Trixie ... :/ | |
| 14:05:48 | sean-k-mooney | those were found late and combined with PTO season we didnt have bandwith to adress them in time | |
| 14:06:20 | sean-k-mooney | zigo: not until epoxy at any rate assumign that will eventually get packaged there | |
| 14:06:50 | zigo | I will package Epoxy, of course, but Dalmatian will be in official Debian 13, not Epoxy. | |
| 14:09:25 | bauzas | that series is one of the largest to review, and that's why it takes a matter of patience | |
| 14:09:38 | bauzas | that said, I agree, the PTO season didn't help too | |
| 14:09:58 | bauzas | I'm more sad on *other* series that got not merged | |
| 14:10:48 | bauzas | anyway, if people care about our project, they can also understand things don't merge magically | |
| 14:11:06 | bauzas | we need hands on, but we struggle finding new contributors | |
| 14:11:30 | opendevreview | zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319 | |
| 14:11:51 | bauzas | if that virtiofs series is a matter of interest for any company, I'd surely appreciate if they could dedicate some time to help with reviewing that series (or testing it at least) | |
| 14:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | zigo: ok the issue with that is dalmatian is obviously not a slurp release | |
| 14:13:21 | sean-k-mooney | so it will support upgrade form caracal but not bobcat | |
| 14:13:49 | sean-k-mooney | althogh they should be able to go from caracal to epoxy when that is released | |
| 14:16:03 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose "libvirt: AMD SEV-ES support" for 2025.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928817 | |
| 14:37:27 | gibi | stephenfin: thanks! | |
| 14:48:47 | zigo | sean-k-mooney: From the Debian perspective, the SLURP releases aren't alligned ... :/ | |
| 14:51:21 | sean-k-mooney | they are for ubuntu and rhel is tbd to be honest but 18 is based on antelope at least | |
| 15:45:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/2024.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2024.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/928363 | |
| 15:54:52 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/2024.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2024.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/928364 | |
| 15:55:25 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose OpenAPI spec for Epoxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928800 | |
| 15:55:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Move Dalmatian implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928666 | |
| 15:55:58 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: doc: mark the maximum microversion for 2024.2 Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928660 | |
| 15:58:08 | bauzas | reminder: nova meeting in 2 mins here | |
| 15:58:15 | bauzas | and gosh, I need to update the agenda | |
| 15:58:37 | sean-k-mooney | dont just empty it | |
| 15:58:52 | sean-k-mooney | some of the items have been prefiled form last week for opendiscusion i think | |
| 15:59:28 | sean-k-mooney | the one i was thinking of has not been added | |
| 15:59:54 | sean-k-mooney | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shared-security-groups | |
| 16:00:19 | sean-k-mooney | the people working on that would like to have it reappvoed for epoxy | |
| 16:00:26 | sean-k-mooney | so lets add that to open discuss | |
| 16:01:34 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sure | |
| 16:01:40 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:40 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:01:40 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Sep 10 16:01:40 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:01:40 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:01:58 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:02:07 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:10 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:11 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:02:12 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:02:17 | bauzas | hey everyone | |
| 16:02:20 | bauzas | nice to see you | |
| 16:02:24 | sean-k-mooney | welcome back | |
| 16:02:35 | bauzas | sorry, was away last week for the OIF Summit Asia | |
| 16:02:36 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:03:26 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:03:28 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:50 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:58 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:04:14 | bauzas | any bug report people would want to discuss ? | |
| 16:04:48 | dansmith | maybe one | |
| 16:04:58 | dansmith | I filed the bug against oslo and nova, | |
| 16:05:11 | bauzas | shoot | |
| 16:05:15 | dansmith | but sean-k-mooney, are you still working on excluding the safety check for the ephemeral disks? | |
| 16:05:16 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2079850 | |
| 16:05:41 | sean-k-mooney | i have a draft of that locally the unit test are failing so im tryign to fix that | |
| 16:05:52 | dansmith | the oslo fix is +2 but it'll take a release and u-c bump before we get it | |
| 16:05:54 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: okay cool | |
| 16:06:16 | bauzas | ergh | |
| 16:06:42 | bauzas | yet another reason to work on the image backend refactoring if you want MHO | |
| 16:06:45 | dansmith | bauzas: basically, if you have nova format your ephemerals as vfat for you, you'll hit this fail | |
| 16:07:00 | dansmith | yes, it's really stupid that we're even doing this, and it's at least partially because of the design of the imagebackend | |
| 16:07:16 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Add functional repoducer for ephemeral disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928310 | |
| 16:07:17 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: only saftey check bootable files created form glance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928829 | |
| 16:07:17 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] adapt to vfat support in oslo.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928462 | |
| 16:07:25 | sean-k-mooney | thats what im working on ^ | |
| 16:07:30 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: cool thanks | |
| 16:07:34 | bauzas | formatting ephemerals to vfat is like "I don't care about my fs, dude" | |
| 16:07:45 | sean-k-mooney | still failing unit test but i should get those passing today | |
| 16:07:55 | dansmith | bauzas: right, it's pointless for us to even do that anyway, because nobody would actually use them as fat anyway | |
| 16:08:05 | dansmith | bauzas: double pointless behavior :) | |
| 16:08:13 | bauzas | I assume this would be for additional disks ? | |
| 16:08:18 | dansmith | ephemerals | |