Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-09-03
14:28:56 dansmith jlejeune: sorry for the runaround :)
14:29:01 jlejeune no prob :)
14:29:05 jlejeune let's do that !
15:12:53 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova master: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925208
15:14:08 jlejeune dansmith: sean-k-mooney: ^
15:14:48 jlejeune something like that ?
15:18:03 dansmith sure, but that will fail pep8
15:18:37 jlejeune my bad
15:18:42 dansmith but looks okay to me otherwise
15:26:07 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova master: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925208
15:33:14 dansmith sean-k-mooney: I think you commented about using backslash continuations recently on another patch, not sure why you didn't on this one, but I also can't find out guideline about that
15:33:55 dansmith I know we have them in some places and I'm not sure I care about our previous hard and fast rule about it, other than just wanting to be consistent
15:33:55 sean-k-mooney ya i personally hate them but we are not as concistent about not doing it as i would like
15:34:15 sean-k-mooney and im presonally geting very tired of style related review comments
15:34:21 dansmith ah right here, second bullet: https://docs.openstack.org/hacking/latest/user/hacking.html
15:34:48 sean-k-mooney yep its documetned but not enforced by tools
15:34:51 dansmith jlejeune: ^
15:34:52 dansmith right
16:02:13 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova master: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925208
16:05:50 erlon Are we having the nova meeting today?
16:06:01 gibi erlon: no, it is cancelled
16:06:10 gibi bauzas is off today
16:06:17 erlon ah, ok, missed the announcement
16:06:51 sean-k-mooney sylvain is at the opensatck asia summit event in korea currently
16:07:19 sean-k-mooney erlon: did you have a pressing topic ot bring up?
16:07:25 gibi yeah that is the more precise term instead of being off :)
16:07:36 erlon I was to bring the shared group to attention again
16:07:55 erlon we have addressed the last reviews suggestions
16:07:58 sean-k-mooney shared security groups or somethign else?
16:08:15 erlon shared security groups
16:08:20 erlon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521
16:08:30 erlon from this series: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:sg-shared-filter
16:08:34 sean-k-mooney ah well for that i think we will liikely jsut reapprove that for next cycle
16:08:59 sean-k-mooney so once RC 1 is creeated in 2 weeks master will reopen for new work and it can proceed
16:10:28 erlon ok, sounds good
16:10:53 erlon is there a way to flag it like that so the team can approve it next?
16:10:58 erlon I
16:12:04 sean-k-mooney put it in the team adjenta for the next meeting and you can link to this irc converstiaon if you like
16:12:37 sean-k-mooney so add it to open disucsion here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Weekly_Nova_team_meeting
16:13:54 sean-k-mooney erlon: skiming the updated version it looks ok but i will need to review it properly later. it looks like you have simplifed it a little since the last version which is nice to see
16:14:21 haleyb sean-k-mooney: i tried to address all the comments
16:14:51 sean-k-mooney haleyb: sorry you are the most recent uploader :) yes i think you have
16:15:22 haleyb i just wanted to move that along, np
16:15:22 sean-k-mooney i basically am getting a headache right now which is why im holding of reviewing it proeprly
16:15:38 haleyb hope you feel better
16:16:13 sean-k-mooney i think its just a lack of drinking water so im goign to go remiday that
17:22:14 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: call get_capabilities() with all CPUs online https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927556
17:41:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Fix port group network metadata generation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923689
17:41:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925208
19:07:12 gmann sean-k-mooney: if you are around https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/926935
19:27:21 sean-k-mooney +2w
19:41:04 gmann thanks
20:54:12 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Support creating servers with RBAC SGs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/811521
21:34:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Bump oslo.policy version to enable new RBAC by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/926935
22:07:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove default override for RBAC config options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925519
#openstack-nova - 2024-09-04
00:55:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: [ironic] Followup fixes around flavor ids https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927764
02:27:29 melwitt sean-k-mooney: re: your review comment about being a freeze period.. we are frozen for features but I didn't think we are frozen on merging bug fixes. at least that isn't how it has worked in the past
02:28:22 melwitt if something has changed, I missed it
07:04:35 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927896
07:07:13 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927897
07:08:13 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927898
11:10:53 gibi bauzas: if you are around, would https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/919569 allowed to land after Feature Freeze even if it has a feature release notes attached? I similar patch for nova landed before FF.
13:43:58 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Remove nova debugger funcitonality https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922496
13:43:59 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: refactor cmd dir for non eventlet console_scripts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904424
13:43:59 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: split monkey_patching form import https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922425
13:44:00 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: remove eventlet.tpool https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905287
13:44:00 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add IO Thread Pool Executor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922497
13:44:01 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: use futerist for RBD calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917962
13:44:01 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: use futureist for scatter_gather https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905284
13:44:30 sean-k-mooney gibi: that is mostly just a rebase but i pull the debugger removal to the front and added the release note
13:53:08 jlejeune sean-k-mooney: dansmith: gibi: hello, can I have quick review on my cherry-picks please ?
13:53:11 jlejeune https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927898
13:53:11 jlejeune https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927896
13:53:14 jlejeune https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927897
13:53:57 dansmith um, did we backport the ami changes?
13:54:58 dansmith huh, I guess so
13:56:37 dansmith sean-k-mooney: these are not functional changes, which means there's no chance of introducing a regression if we approve these out of order.. any opposition to just approving them all and let the dust settle?
13:57:10 sean-k-mooney you mean approving across all stabel branches
13:57:36 sean-k-mooney it will fail the backport check in gate requiring a recheck
13:58:01 sean-k-mooney unless we workaround it by addding StableOnly
13:58:21 sean-k-mooney or whatever the commit message thing we need to add upstream is
13:58:58 vicent Good morning! I am installing openstack-ansible 29.0.2 on metal. I noticed the nova.conf template doesn't include the rootwrap_config field.
13:59:00 sean-k-mooney dansmith: so no no objection but mechanically it wont work right now
14:00:14 dansmith sean-k-mooney: oh right forgot
14:00:31 vicent I am using nova image_type: lvm.
14:01:33 vicent Because of that nova gives me error: "2024-09-04 17:00:41.313 73654 WARNING oslo.privsep.daemon [-] privsep log: sudo: nova-rootwrap: command not found". Isn't that a bug?
14:06:52 jlejeune dansmith: yes we backported AMI removal commit on all stable branchs
14:11:07 sean-k-mooney ill review those back ports and premetivly +2 but hold +w on the older ones
14:11:13 sean-k-mooney then we can just +w as they merge
14:11:41 vicent ok, adding the rootwrap_config field on nova.conf didn't work. Any idea why nova-rootwrap is not found? It is there on the venv... $ ls /openstack/venvs/nova-29.0.2/bin/nova-rootwrap
14:11:45 vicent /openstack/venvs/nova-29.0.2/bin/nova-rootwrap
14:29:03 vicent I am basically trying this:
14:29:06 vicent https://www.cloudnull.io/2017/12/nova-lvm-an-iop-love-story/
14:33:36 sean-k-mooney so nova does not use rootwap realy itslef its used by os-brick
14:33:55 sean-k-mooney and its used for spawnign privsep
14:39:33 vicent https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/storage/lvm.py#L92 this is where nova calls privsep
14:48:55 vicent If privsev is not used in nova, then this is a problem: "2024-09-04 17:47:01.170 113107 INFO oslo.privsep.daemon [None req-f50b55b0-5b93-4a92-9c95-7d03b61d04b6 - - - - - -] Running privsep helper: ['sudo', 'nova-rootwrap', '/etc/nova/rootwrap.conf', 'privsep-helper', '--config-file', '/etc/nova/nova.conf', '--privsep_context', 'nova.privsep.sys_admin_pctxt', '--privsep_sock_path',
14:49:01 vicent '/tmp/tmpdshabbj0/privsep.sock']"
15:18:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Skip snapshot test when missing qemu-img https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927896
15:39:32 mnaser dansmith: are you able to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-test-images/+/926942 by any chance? we use github mirrors for running jobs and since the job to mirror that repo was missing, its empty and breaking ci

Earlier   Later