Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-08-27
16:28:28 sean-k-mooney i see normal bfv works
16:28:38 fwiesel Yeah, that is its own bug an discussion
16:28:40 sean-k-mooney if there is a followup for the rebuild case i can upgrade to +2
16:29:07 sean-k-mooney ok upgraded to +2 based on the latest ci results
16:29:09 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627
16:29:14 fwiesel \o/
16:29:27 fwiesel That would be then from my side for this week, unless there are questions.
16:29:34 sean-k-mooney im tempeted to +w since other have not reviewd in 6 months
16:29:36 bauzas not from me
16:29:53 bauzas I can review the patch
16:30:03 bauzas CI is green
16:30:27 bauzas and we have some kind of gentlemen's agreement on 'other virt drivers' patches we may not know by heart
16:30:30 sean-k-mooney ok, but general question since cores are not really maintianing the vmware stuff do we want ot require 2 +2s if ci is green and fwiesel's team are the autors of the patch?
16:30:49 sean-k-mooney im stictly talking about chagne that only impact vmware like this
16:30:51 bauzas that's the whole point of running a stable CI
16:31:03 dansmith I still want good review (i.e. two +2s)
16:31:19 bauzas if we can trust the vmware job, then we can get some good regressing insight
16:31:33 bauzas but I second dansmith on not release our two cores approval
16:31:56 sean-k-mooney ok then unless i see more people reviewin this i think we need to reopen the deprecation pathces
16:31:58 bauzas previously, we had the same concerns when other drivers were asking for reviews and we had that agreement
16:32:22 bauzas I don't see the need of threatening the driver
16:32:26 sean-k-mooney im not seeing other actully take the time to review but bauzas if your happy too review then cool
16:32:31 gibi I would be OK to drop down to 1x +2 for a driver only code with a good CI
16:32:48 dansmith I'm mostly concerned about drivers doing things they shouldn't and not so much the review of the actual vmware-specific bits
16:32:49 bauzas fwiesel makes a solid effort of keeping the job paceful, so we just need reviews
16:32:59 dansmith and I think if we drop down the review requirement we're just asking for rubber stamps
16:33:16 bauzas yeah, exactly why I think we need to continue the agreement we had
16:33:43 sean-k-mooney bauzas: that agreement goes too ways assuming more cores then just me look at the patch :)
16:33:49 bauzas two cores need to lookup the patches and somehow be "enlighted" by the result of the CI job
16:34:00 sean-k-mooney im happy for the work fwiesel has been doing
16:34:13 bauzas sean-k-mooney: correct and that's why I'm saying this is a normal situation
16:34:26 bauzas I got the signal and I'll do my homework
16:34:53 bauzas anything else about vmware ?
16:35:39 fwiesel Not from me.
16:35:41 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:35:48 bauzas I have two procedural items
16:35:52 bauzas (bauzas) Sep 3 meeting
16:36:05 bauzas I'll be traveling to the OIF Asia Summit
16:36:19 bauzas only that week
16:36:27 bauzas so I won't be able to run the meeting
16:36:35 bauzas so either we skip or someone runs it
16:37:17 bauzas the most critical thing is to say next week that FeatureFreeze is coming in 2 days
16:37:36 bauzas so, anyone fancy runnning it ?
16:37:50 bauzas I can notify the deadline async using the ML
16:38:26 bauzas okay, I don't see any head popping up
16:38:29 bauzas so,
16:38:37 bauzas #info Sep 3 meeting is CANCELLED
16:38:45 bauzas #action bauzas to notify by email
16:38:51 bauzas second poit
16:38:53 bauzas point*
16:39:00 bauzas (bauzas) Epoxy PTL seat
16:39:19 bauzas if you contributed to nova recently, you received some email
16:39:38 bauzas maybe you don't know but I'm running for a TC seat this cycle
16:40:11 bauzas I think I can both sit on two chairs (TC and PTL) but I wanted to let people consider the PTL position
16:41:05 bauzas either way, my personal take is that IMHO nova is that important to me that I'd rather stick on that seat than leave the project to be leaderless (procedurarely)
16:41:26 bauzas but if you consider running for that position, my DM is open
16:41:45 bauzas that's it from me
16:42:02 bauzas I don't see any other item in the agenda
16:42:43 bauzas so unless someone disagrees loudly, let's end this meeting earlier and lemme give you 15 mins back of your time
16:43:35 bauzas okay, thanks folks
16:43:44 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-27-16.01.log.html
16:43:44 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-27-16.01.txt
16:43:44 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-27-16.01.html
16:43:44 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Aug 27 16:43:44 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:43:44 bauzas #endmeeting
16:43:52 gibi thanks
16:43:52 fwiesel Thanks, everyone
16:44:03 elodilles thanks o/
16:44:42 JayF sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923910 what do you need from me for this to land?
16:45:14 JayF sean-k-mooney: I know FF is in two days, I've been asking for reviews but with the image issues flipping everything upside down, they haven't been coming :)
16:46:57 bauzas JayF: no, FF is next week
16:47:14 JayF oh, cool, I thought it was literally EOW
16:47:27 JayF either way doesn't matter unless I get reviews and/or know what actions I need to take :D
16:47:34 bauzas oh shit
16:47:44 bauzas https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html#d-ff
16:47:48 bauzas this is this week
16:47:54 JayF Maybe I'll find time to do a video demo, one of my junior folks did that for a patch stuck in Ironic and it helped get reviews
16:47:56 bauzas my brain fucked it up
16:48:24 JayF I think every core on any OpenStack project has a get-out-of-mistake-free card after the major CVE handling in the middle of the cycle
16:51:04 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: [ironic] Factor out metadata and send to ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/923910
16:56:06 dansmith bauzas: did you see my comments on that vmware patch?
16:56:08 dansmith I didn't -1 because they were questions
16:56:13 sean-k-mooney JayF: i guess i just need to back and review agian
16:56:34 JayF sean-k-mooney: would a video demo of it in devstack help you review it?
16:56:35 sean-k-mooney JayF: i think it was largly fine the last time i looked but i wanted to see it end to end
16:56:51 sean-k-mooney JayF: proably not but ill watch it if you ahve one
16:57:19 JayF I mean, I won't make one if the primary audience doesn't want it :D
17:07:32 dansmith man the gate is effing busy
18:01:39 sean-k-mooney i havnt looked recently but we are coming to FF
18:01:45 sean-k-mooney so ya...
18:53:16 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Handle empty imageRef alongside null for local BDM check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927311
18:54:31 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Use format_inspector from oslo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925025
18:55:00 dansmith hoo bioy
19:06:20 sean-k-mooney ah cool so the tempest test change also merged
#openstack-nova - 2024-08-28
01:07:15 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add --max_rows option to 'db purge' command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927339
07:50:30 opendevreview Michael Still proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add extra specs for USB redirection. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927354
07:50:51 mikal sean-k-mooney: that's the extra specs for USB device redirection finished I hope.
08:15:56 jayaanand_ https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/WNKStFUI/
08:16:17 jayaanand_ i am using multi-node devstack setup to troubleshoot customer issue. Devstack is deployed with latest code. during live migration i am facing below issue. your suggestion is deeply appreciate.
08:17:18 opendevreview Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova master: Add more password generation options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865669

Earlier   Later