| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-08-06 | |||
| 16:05:40 | dansmith | but it was also (re-)asserted that stream is making it clear it's not stable enough for our purposes, which I definitely agree with :) | |
| 16:06:42 | dansmith | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/925368?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary | |
| 16:07:21 | gibi | thank dansmith for the pointers | |
| 16:08:02 | gibi | If somebody has the time to investigate further then go for it. :) | |
| 16:08:40 | gibi | but I guess as it is not blocking the CI directly it will take a while to get to it | |
| 16:09:21 | gibi | anything else about the centos jobs or about the gate in general? | |
| 16:10:06 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:10:20 | gibi | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:10:31 | gibi | #info Dalmatian-3 in 3 weeks | |
| 16:10:44 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:49 | gibi | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:11:07 | gibi | Is there anything to discuss about the upcoming release? | |
| 16:12:07 | tkajinam | there is one open follow-up edit of the spec. would be nice if it can be quickly reviewed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924563 | |
| 16:12:36 | gibi | tkajinam: I will look at it after the meeting | |
| 16:12:48 | tkajinam | gibi, thx ! | |
| 16:13:33 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:13:42 | gibi | elodilles: hi! :) | |
| 16:13:45 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:13:50 | elodilles | #info stable/202*.* gates seem to be OK | |
| 16:14:03 | elodilles | #info nova stable release patches (with CVE fix): https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+intopic:nova+is:open | |
| 16:14:18 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: it may be worth condiering if the fibs jobs could move to rocky to be slightly more stable but ya i still agree in general. we can discusus that later if peopel want to do that work outside the meeting or in open dicussion at the end | |
| 16:14:22 | elodilles | waiting for release liaison reviews ^^^ o:) | |
| 16:14:37 | gibi | bauzas and Uggla are on PTO | |
| 16:14:48 | elodilles | gibi: ACK | |
| 16:14:57 | sean-k-mooney | amit is also a release liason | |
| 16:15:05 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yep | |
| 16:15:17 | elodilles | then auniyal is the only available release liaison o:) | |
| 16:15:19 | sean-k-mooney | auniyal: ^ can you prioitse that | |
| 16:15:48 | elodilles | thanks in advance o:) | |
| 16:15:56 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:16:22 | elodilles | if anyone finds any gate issue then please add it there ^^^ | |
| 16:16:35 | elodilles | that's all about stable from me | |
| 16:17:01 | gibi | elodilles: thanks! | |
| 16:17:08 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:17:16 | gibi | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:17:20 | gibi | #info fwiesel on PTO until the 27th August. | |
| 16:17:33 | gibi | so I guess no news here | |
| 16:17:39 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:17:44 | gibi | (bauzas) Aug 6, 13 and 20 nova meetings | |
| 16:18:05 | gibi | so I took today's meeting but cannot do 13th or 20th | |
| 16:18:10 | gibi | any volunteer? | |
| 16:20:24 | gibi | then they are cancelled | |
| 16:20:47 | gibi | #info the meeting on the 13th and on the 20th are cancelled | |
| 16:21:00 | gibi | any other topic for today? | |
| 16:21:43 | dansmith | ++ for cancel :) | |
| 16:23:25 | gibi | I guess we are done for today then | |
| 16:23:31 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-06-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:23:31 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-06-16.00.txt | |
| 16:23:31 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-08-06-16.00.html | |
| 16:23:31 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 6 16:23:31 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:23:31 | gibi | #endmeeting | |
| 16:23:36 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:23:37 | gibi | thanks folks | |
| 16:24:03 | tkajinam | thanks | |
| 16:24:22 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Follow up for "libvirt: AMD SEV-ES support" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924563 | |
| 18:09:48 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: POC/DNM: Remove vTPM live migration block https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 18:31:22 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: POC/DNM: Remove vTPM live migration block https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 23:09:09 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Check version for node device XML validate flags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925826 | |
| 23:14:06 | melwitt | fyi gibi and sean-k-mooney ^ thanks songwenping_ for reporting the issue | |
| 23:17:40 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: that wont work | |
| 23:17:49 | sean-k-mooney | the api does not have a flags filed before 8.10.0 | |
| 23:18:04 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: so you ned to change the function call rahter then the flags | |
| 23:18:48 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: ugh dammit. thanks 😩 | |
| 23:19:18 | sean-k-mooney | actully | |
| 23:19:23 | sean-k-mooney | no i miss read the c code | |
| 23:19:28 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt/commit/d8791c3c7caa6e3cadaf98a5a2c94b232ac30fed#diff-29f62ad20a5a2dffc62d8d09df5ef6e7b28c36c723ae7da56eb371c7547fbf98L70 | |
| 23:19:39 | sean-k-mooney | so it was passing a hardcoded 0 for flags before | |
| 23:19:48 | sean-k-mooney | so your change shoudl be good | |
| 23:20:03 | sean-k-mooney | ill review it properly tomorrow after we see what ci says | |
| 23:20:30 | sean-k-mooney | the docs change clarifies it | |
| 23:20:32 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt/commit/d8791c3c7caa6e3cadaf98a5a2c94b232ac30fed#diff-7552129210db333b0c2e3d224d1ae11a674bbb0b56f6b2708452be4e0c023a98L697 | |
| 23:20:38 | sean-k-mooney | @flags: extra flags; not used yet, so callers should always pass 0 | |
| 23:20:46 | sean-k-mooney | to * @flags: bitwise-OR of supported virNodeDeviceCreateXMLFlags | |
| 23:22:31 | melwitt | ah ok, I have seen they have that for some APIs where it takes flags of 0 as sort of a placeholder | |
| 23:22:43 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 23:23:01 | sean-k-mooney | the try to future proof may apis by allowing flags even if not supproted | |
| 23:23:16 | sean-k-mooney | i guess that semi reasonabel for c to not break abi compatiablity | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-08-07 | |||
| 01:00:53 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925635 | |
| 02:45:46 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Detect AMD SEV-ES support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925685 | |
| 06:57:49 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing cont'd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925838 | |
| 07:04:10 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM testing cont'd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925838 | |
| 07:10:02 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: just for illustrating how the fetch_func stuff is not used at all in this poc ^ (hopefully I didn't mess up in deleting) | |
| 07:41:17 | gibi | melwitt: thanks for proposing the fix for the persistent mdev bug | |
| 10:06:51 | ykarel | can someone check the zed backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925749 | |
| 10:11:56 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Detect AMD SEV-ES support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925685 | |
| 11:48:32 | elodilles | ykarel: clean cherry pick so +2+W'd it | |
| 11:48:47 | ykarel | thx elodilles | |
| 11:48:51 | gibi | ykarel: as that targets an unmaintained branch nova core team is not involved reviewing and landing it | |
| 11:51:45 | gibi | but I guess elodilles is in the global unmaintained core team :) | |
| 11:53:02 | ykarel | gibi, ack | |
| 11:53:03 | sean-k-mooney | so i have debated this in the past with my self but i think the unmatined branches woudl benifit form a dedicated channel that is seperate form the proejct channels to cordinate unmatined branch reviews | |
| 11:54:53 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: there is a semi-official channel: #openstack-unmaintained o:) | |
| 11:57:49 | sean-k-mooney | ack provided the unmaintained pings are not excessive i dont entirly object to havign them here too but we were very clear in teh resolution that core teams would not review patches too or genericallly maintiane the unmainted branches as part fo the resolution | |
| 11:58:07 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 11:58:56 | sean-k-mooney | so unless an unmainted branch maitiner wants input on a patch they are unsure about i woudl prefer to avoid the day to day work of maintainign them here | |
| 11:59:34 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: if you are unsure about somethign imporant liek a cve back port we will proably be fine with a quick skim over a patch you have prepared | |
| 12:00:07 | sean-k-mooney | or if your trying to resolve a merge conflcit and we are not too busy but in general for can we review x i would prefer to keep that in #openstack-unmaintained | |
| 12:13:47 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ACK, thanks in advance! o:) | |
| 12:23:59 | gibi | (not that I want it) | |
| 12:24:48 | sean-k-mooney | same i considerd puting my name forward but i have too much on my plate currently to really consier it | |