Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-30
16:11:14 bauzas I need to modify this etherpad ^
16:11:28 bauzas to verify which changes are now merged
16:11:49 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:11:55 bauzas elodilles: hello !
16:12:00 elodilles o/
16:12:08 elodilles #info stable/202*.* gates seem to be OK
16:12:18 elodilles at least i'm not aware any blocking issue :)
16:12:26 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:12:42 elodilles but if you find any issue then please add it here ^^^
16:12:56 sean-k-mooney so regardign the stable branches https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2073528%22 is still pending
16:13:08 sean-k-mooney other wise i think we could do a release today/now
16:13:20 sean-k-mooney im around today and tomrow
16:13:30 sean-k-mooney do we want to try and get that landed today
16:13:38 sean-k-mooney or do we want to proceed without it
16:13:48 sean-k-mooney i would hope we could do a release this week
16:14:01 sean-k-mooney elodilles: bauzas: toughts ^
16:14:32 bauzas I'm good if all the changes are now merged
16:14:36 elodilles i can prepare the release patches today or later, which you prefer best
16:14:45 bauzas elodilles: do this and then ping me please
16:15:17 sean-k-mooney well
16:15:33 sean-k-mooney bauzas: the cve patches are merged but not the cpu govenor ones you ask me to include
16:15:52 sean-k-mooney those are making there way thoguh the gate just not ready right now
16:16:00 sean-k-mooney so what im askign is shall we wait for them
16:16:11 sean-k-mooney or porceed with the current state of the branches
16:16:53 bauzas sean-k-mooney: then we could just wait for them
16:16:55 sean-k-mooney im inclined to say wait 1 more day
16:17:02 sean-k-mooney and do it tomorrow
16:17:07 bauzas tomorrow morning we could look at them
16:17:12 elodilles ACK, sounds good to me too
16:17:17 bauzas thanks elod
16:17:33 sean-k-mooney ok that the only topic i had for stable branches we can move on unless anyone else has one
16:17:37 bauzas thanks
16:17:40 bauzas I don't
16:17:43 elodilles (i did not realise the patch is failed on gate :/)
16:18:03 elodilles nothing else from me either
16:18:20 bauzas ok, moving on then
16:18:25 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:18:37 bauzas fwiesel: around ?
16:19:17 bauzas looks not, no worries
16:19:17 fwiesel Yes, sorry
16:19:20 bauzas oh
16:19:24 bauzas then, tell this :)
16:19:25 fwiesel #info Fixed bug in our network driver causing failure in devstack master setup. Working down backlog of old changes affected by it.
16:19:28 bauzas \o/
16:19:57 bauzas cool, nothing else ?
16:19:58 fwiesel So, if you were missing notifications from the VMware Ci, that should hopefully be fixed now.
16:20:01 bauzas ++
16:20:03 bauzas thanks
16:20:19 bauzas last topic then
16:20:24 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:20:31 bauzas I already asked it
16:20:36 bauzas (bauzas) Aug 6, 13 and 20 nova meetings
16:21:01 bauzas so, I'll be PTO on Friday, until Aug 25
16:21:16 bauzas so either you run the meetings without me, or we punt them
16:21:18 bauzas as folks want
16:21:48 gibi I can take the 6th if others can take the 13th and 20th
16:21:57 bauzas thanks gibi
16:22:04 bauzas I'll just create an email
16:22:10 sean-k-mooney i guess lets defer that to the 6th
16:22:19 sean-k-mooney and see who is around ectra
16:22:23 bauzas okay, I'm done now
16:22:32 bauzas any other stuff to discuss ?
16:22:57 sean-k-mooney we could discssu it off meeting but i have a question for fwiesel
16:23:10 bauzas yes, I'd appreciate
16:23:22 bauzas I'm burned, litterally because of the heat wave :-)
16:23:34 bauzas thanks folks
16:23:39 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-30-16.00.log.html
16:23:39 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-30-16.00.txt
16:23:39 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-30-16.00.html
16:23:39 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 30 16:23:39 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:23:39 bauzas #endmeeting
16:23:47 sean-k-mooney fwiesel: bauzas: baiscally there are patches we need to reveiw to fix vmware
16:23:52 priteau May I ask for a fairly simple review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924104 which is required to backport some fixes to unmaintained/yoga?
16:23:55 sean-k-mooney but im not sure we are makeing progress on that
16:23:57 bauzas sean-k-mooney: also https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/2075203
16:24:25 bauzas sean-k-mooney: as I said, I need to review a lot of patches
16:24:31 sean-k-mooney priteau: that a good question i kind of want to say no
16:24:37 bauzas before I'm going off
16:24:55 sean-k-mooney priteau: so the unmaintained banches are not maintined by the core team snd we cant actuly merge patches there by desgin
16:24:59 bauzas anyway, I need to hardstop now, I need some fresh air
16:25:06 bauzas my home office is around 32°C
16:25:17 sean-k-mooney so im not sure if it woudl be better to have a sepreate channel to dicuss those branches or not
16:25:46 priteau sean-k-mooney: I know, but even though elodilles is happy to approve some patches, they are blocked by CI before of the cherry-pick validation
16:25:47 elodilles sean-k-mooney: it's about the tooling, and on master branch, though it is to handle unmaintained branches o:)
16:25:50 sean-k-mooney granted thsi patch is to master for the cherry pick validator
16:25:57 sean-k-mooney but im not sure we shoudl change master of this
16:26:23 priteau The idea was to backport this to all branches one by one so future unmaintained branches would already have the fix
16:26:41 sean-k-mooney elodilles: yep im just conficlted about adjusting any maintained branch becuse of unmaintianed
16:26:41 priteau At some point stable/2024.1 will be unmaintained/2024.1
16:26:50 elodilles sean-k-mooney: i'd rather change this on master so that we(/i o:)) don't have to fix it everytime a new unmaintained branch is created o:)
16:27:07 sean-k-mooney elodilles: or you turn off that job on umaintainted
16:27:26 elodilles sean-k-mooney: if we use it on stable then i rather keep it on unmaintained
16:27:29 sean-k-mooney in this specific case we proably can but
16:27:41 sean-k-mooney but as a general rule i dont think we shoudl do that
16:29:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [manila]Use client token when talking to manila https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925277
16:29:42 fwiesel sean-k-mooney: Sorry, I was AFK. There is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627 (on the list) and then there is bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2058225)
16:30:07 elodilles sean-k-mooney: if this would be something complex change i'd vote for the same (don't waste time on master+stable branches), but this is a rather simple fix
16:30:09 fwiesel Hopefully, if we have addressed those then we should be good to go.
16:30:44 sean-k-mooney elodilles: well the reason im bringin it is is by definition we shoudl not be speinding time maintianing the unmainted branches espcially on the ci front
16:31:01 sean-k-mooney in this case i think your right its simple enough to do this

Earlier   Later