Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-06-17
20:52:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: [ironic] Partition & use cache for list_instance* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/906155
21:33:41 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: [ironic] Partition & use cache for list_instance* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922155
#openstack-nova - 2024-06-18
08:20:00 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
08:20:00 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
08:20:01 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881472
08:20:01 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075
08:20:02 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823
08:20:02 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
08:20:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824
08:20:04 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285
08:20:04 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284
08:20:06 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287
08:20:06 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286
08:20:08 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (compute manager) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885751
08:20:08 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883862
08:20:10 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885753
08:20:10 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
08:20:12 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
08:20:12 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
08:20:14 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282
08:20:14 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
08:20:16 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086
08:20:16 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283
08:20:18 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642
08:20:18 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
08:26:20 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: [ironic] Partition & use cache for list_instance* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922155
08:29:13 sahid o/
08:30:02 sahid hello gibi, any chance to have your eyes on that one? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/921665 ?
08:30:12 sahid :-)
08:30:31 sahid I think you and _sean-k-mooney are the ones
08:55:27 bauzas sean-k-mooney: when you're up, I'm curious why FORCE=yes envvar wasn't used by ./stack.sh here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140/3/.zuul.yaml#267
08:55:55 bauzas the job run failed because FORCE=yes wasn't around https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_a38/922140/3/experimental/nova-mtty/a383bd1/job-output.txt
08:57:24 bauzas oh, [[ True != \y\e\s ]]
08:57:30 bauzas hmmmm
09:03:18 bauzas sean-k-mooney: nevermind, I think I found the solution
09:03:53 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP : Enable an experimental job for testing mtty https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140
09:03:54 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP : mtty: add devstack compilation for fedora builds https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/918420
09:33:42 frickler bauzas: seems qa has finally found a volunteer to make devstack run on noble? ;)
09:35:27 bauzas frickler: yeah because I need to use a quite new libvirt version for testing mtty :)
09:46:50 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ya its proably not using the TrueOrFalse macro
09:47:52 sean-k-mooney frickler: i have been meanign to try that too. i spun up a ubuntu vm when the beta was released but i dont think i got around to running devstack on it
09:48:40 sean-k-mooney frickler: do we have images in ci yet. i was debating if i waould spend time on the dib patch or not
09:52:37 bauzas looks like using brackets with 'yes' worked
09:52:51 bauzas thanks codesearch
09:55:57 frickler sean-k-mooney: yes, images are there and I proposed to run py312 unittests on noble as next step, but I won't get to look into testing devstack myself https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/922132
09:58:57 sean-k-mooney frickler: ack ya i think that makes more sense then using pyenv on debian
09:59:59 sean-k-mooney frickler: for what its worth i have no issue with useing debian or debian testing in our ci i just dont think we need to be compling our onw python even if we are doing it once in the image build when there is py312 aviabel in 24.04 and centos 10 stream already
10:02:20 frickler sean-k-mooney: yes, using the default python version for each distro seems more sensible to me, too. but I haven't seen any work on centos 10 yet, is it out already?
10:02:39 sean-k-mooney yep its out for about a month
10:02:54 sean-k-mooney https://mirror.stream.centos.org/10-stream/
10:03:54 sean-k-mooney the generic cloud image is here https://composes.stream.centos.org/stream-10/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/BaseOS/x86_64/images/CentOS-Stream-GenericCloud-10-20240617.0.x86_64.qcow2
10:04:11 sean-k-mooney frickler: i dont think there has been an offical release annouchment yet
10:05:22 sean-k-mooney im hoping we can get ubuntu 24.04 into ci this cycle and c10s next cycle as a testing runtime with the 2025.1 the last release with c9s
10:06:03 sean-k-mooney i.e 2025.1 will be the upgrade release for both ubuntu 22.04->24.04 and centos stream 9 -> 10
10:07:28 frickler IMO you'd better get both working at least with devstack this cycle, then, so the TC can add them to the support list for 2025.1 from the start
10:08:29 sean-k-mooney that woudl be ideal yes
10:08:58 sean-k-mooney the supported runtimes have generally been based on aviablity not devstack support in the past
10:09:31 sean-k-mooney so both are valid for inclustion and should be added by default based on our disto upgrade policy
10:09:54 sean-k-mooney assumign c10s has its offial release annouchment before the start of the next cycle
10:10:10 sean-k-mooney practically speakign however yes we need devstack to work
10:10:24 sean-k-mooney the main challange is likely the changes to pip isntalling
10:10:38 sean-k-mooney ubuntu should be in a good place but c9s is still using a venv
10:10:46 sean-k-mooney so we need to fix that this cycle
10:10:58 sean-k-mooney *still not useing a venv
10:11:20 sean-k-mooney i have not chekced if c10s has blocked "sudo pip install" or not
10:11:58 sean-k-mooney but thats the direction most distor seam to be going so i would not be surpprised if they have, although fedora has not yet so im unsure
11:45:36 opendevreview Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Lazy Metadata Loading in order to Reduce Server Load https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201
12:16:39 opendevreview Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Lazy Metadata Loading in order to Reduce Server Load https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201
12:35:28 opendevreview Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Lazy Metadata Loading in order to Reduce Server Load https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201
12:55:14 opendevreview Fabian Wiesel proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Lazy Metadata Loading in order to Reduce Server Load https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201
13:15:19 bauzas frickler: sean-k-mooney: fwiw, I got some distutils issue when stacking on noble https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c2329f04a5344b4bbc9661e2360d282/log/job-output.txt#8152-8160
13:16:27 bauzas thanks py3.12
13:17:47 sean-k-mooney well distutils was remvoed
13:17:54 sean-k-mooney it wsa deprected for quite a while
13:18:10 bauzas I know
13:18:23 bauzas deprecated in 3.10
13:18:26 sean-k-mooney so this seams to be a limitaiton in the requirement repo that should be updated
13:18:29 bauzas with a removal on 3.12
13:18:37 sean-k-mooney its not an issue in openstack istslef
13:18:41 bauzas (which is *again* a short time)
13:18:52 sean-k-mooney 2 years is not short
13:19:01 bauzas for a language ?
13:19:06 sean-k-mooney correct
13:19:10 bauzas you're kidding?
13:19:13 sean-k-mooney i think your postion on that is unreasonable
13:19:21 sean-k-mooney but i dont want to get into that now
13:19:31 bauzas ask the operators what their positions are on something like 2 years
13:20:12 bauzas anyway, ship has sailed
13:20:22 bauzas and I agree, this is a requirements repo
13:20:22 frickler ah, nice, I noticed earlier today that also the use of pkg_resources in reqs repo needs replacing
13:20:29 sean-k-mooney its the cadance we do downtream major releease on and that lts distos often release on
13:21:05 sean-k-mooney also i belive as of 3.11 python are not giving 3 release or 3 years for removals
13:21:07 frickler also seems that there is no unit testing for edit-constraints. more fun
13:21:28 sean-k-mooney frickler: i would expect it to be used in all the tox gets for the cross gating
13:21:51 sean-k-mooney frickler:but probaly nothing direcltly testing it
13:22:12 frickler yes, the cross tests all run the latest support python, which is 3.11
13:22:23 sean-k-mooney frickler: since this was not seen on the debinian pyevn tests im guessign it was falling back to the dist utils module form the default versio
13:23:08 frickler sean-k-mooney: iiuc the error is seen in devstack only, that didn't run on py312 yet
13:23:13 bauzas frickler: want me to report a bug against requirements ?
13:23:53 sean-k-mooney maybe we dont do the requriemts edit for tox because we are installing the package explcity

Earlier   Later