| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-04-30 | |||
| 16:19:16 | gibi | I have no objection to bump to the next | |
| 16:19:16 | sean-k-mooney | as long as we dont just require latest | |
| 16:19:18 | zigo | bauzas: I don't mind, and I don't really care the SLURP thingy, because it's 1/ not alligned with Debian in terms of dates 2/ still a 1 year thingy instead of 2. | |
| 16:19:24 | sean-k-mooney | we obviously cant do that on stable | |
| 16:19:25 | tkajinam | If I hear no immediate objections here then I'll update all patches based on that strategy | |
| 16:19:32 | bauzas | and given our minimums are quite (very) old, I think I'm OK with bumpinig | |
| 16:19:40 | tkajinam | if you find any concern with specific bumps then we can discuss that in detail | |
| 16:19:49 | zigo | Once we switch to a 1 year release and SLURP, effectively supporting debian stable -> stable +1 upgrades, then I'll start to care. | |
| 16:19:50 | sean-k-mooney | +2 | |
| 16:19:55 | bauzas | tkajinam: you know what ? do it, and we'll see if people yell | |
| 16:20:12 | tkajinam | most of my patches are based on option 1 (without bump) so have to be updated for option 2. | |
| 16:20:34 | tkajinam | bauzas, yup :-) that's why I created these changes, actually | |
| 16:21:05 | zigo | Mostly in distros: we don't need to care about excludes, we just need to *not* package them. :P | |
| 16:21:17 | zigo | (which only very rarely happen) | |
| 16:21:17 | bauzas | #agreed it seems our requirement minimums are actually very old so we all accept to raise the versions of the packages that were having excluded versions to the N+1 release | |
| 16:21:41 | bauzas | zigo: it only happens when the latest version has to be excluded: ) | |
| 16:21:43 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:21:46 | zigo | Yeah, we're talking about buster to trixie (ie: debian 9 to 13) here ... :P | |
| 16:21:52 | fwiesel | Stupid question: are there really people out there that mix and match releases of individual packages in the same python environment? Is that even allowed? | |
| 16:22:03 | bauzas | when we talk of 5-yo excluded versions, I think nobody cares | |
| 16:22:15 | zigo | fwiesel: It depends what service, for some it's possible. | |
| 16:22:26 | bauzas | that's why we have global requirements | |
| 16:22:43 | zigo | fwiesel: For example, if you're doing multi-region with a single keystone, it's important that older Keystone is supported by newer rest-of-openstack. | |
| 16:22:59 | zigo | Keystone is probably a special case... | |
| 16:23:03 | fwiesel | Sure, but that is kind of guaranteed by the microversions. | |
| 16:23:14 | tkajinam | I'll update these patches so it'd be nice these can be review with priority. as I said requirements-check job is broken and we need these to merge any changes which update reqs now | |
| 16:23:26 | fwiesel | At least we upgrade keystone and other services independently. and use the uppser-constraints of the respective releases of the service. | |
| 16:23:28 | bauzas | bumping our minimums puts some stress to some other projects that may also need to upgrade their own minimums, but here we're talking of very old versions | |
| 16:23:43 | bauzas | tkajinam: noted, I'll pay my duty | |
| 16:23:46 | tkajinam | I've also left the other bug there and that's also nice-to-have thing to unblock our testing glance run by httpd+mod_wsgi in puppet jobs | |
| 16:23:59 | tkajinam | but that's not as much urgent now | |
| 16:24:21 | bauzas | I was frankly off upstream those weeks but I'm now back | |
| 16:24:35 | bauzas | moving on I guess | |
| 16:24:39 | tkajinam | that's all from my side | |
| 16:24:42 | tkajinam | yup | |
| 16:24:51 | bauzas | tkajinam: thanks for having reported it and worked on it | |
| 16:25:02 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:25:10 | bauzas | elodilles: you're next ! | |
| 16:25:17 | elodilles | o7 | |
| 16:25:26 | elodilles | #info no recent merges, but stable/202*.* branches' gates should be OK | |
| 16:25:35 | elodilles | #info final release for stable zed is out (26.3.0) | |
| 16:25:39 | bauzas | shhhh | |
| 16:25:49 | elodilles | #info stable/zed transitioned to Unmaintained | |
| 16:25:56 | elodilles | #info open stable/zed patches were abandoned, cherry pick them to unmaintained/zed if needed | |
| 16:25:56 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:26:07 | elodilles | note: as with the previous newly opened unmaintained branches, unmaintained/zed gate might need some fixes before we can merge anything there | |
| 16:26:07 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 16:26:27 | elodilles | last but not least: | |
| 16:26:31 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:26:41 | bauzas | which means that now all our supported releases follow the SLURP cadence, huzzah | |
| 16:26:52 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/917608 | |
| 16:26:57 | zigo | zed is what's in bookworm ... :/ | |
| 16:26:57 | sean-k-mooney | are we expecting the default brances for grenade to be updated on stable/antelope centrally | |
| 16:27:03 | elodilles | bauzas: yepp | |
| 16:27:30 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/917608 | |
| 16:27:49 | bauzas | thanks elodilles | |
| 16:27:58 | bauzas | anything else on the stable side ? | |
| 16:27:59 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: we had some patches, but i don't know whether that is among them :X | |
| 16:28:14 | elodilles | bauzas: np, nothing else from me | |
| 16:28:21 | sean-k-mooney | ack so that will cause grenade to fail then since the base barnch wont exist | |
| 16:28:40 | sean-k-mooney | but its also a simple enough change once all the branch movign is done | |
| 16:28:57 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:28:59 | bauzas | I think grenade has some homework anytime we delete a branch | |
| 16:29:15 | bauzas | but let's move on | |
| 16:29:21 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:29:37 | bauzas | fwiesel: wanting to say something ? | |
| 16:29:47 | fwiesel | Not really. | |
| 16:30:02 | fwiesel | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909474 has been reviewed, so that's great. Thanks to everyone. | |
| 16:30:11 | fwiesel | Any questions? | |
| 16:30:27 | sean-k-mooney | am i saw the chagnes that dan asked for | |
| 16:30:29 | bauzas | cool, I'll see if I can look at it | |
| 16:30:38 | sean-k-mooney | i have not had time to re review but ill try and get to it today | |
| 16:30:38 | bauzas | but dan and sean already did their work | |
| 16:30:42 | sean-k-mooney | after the meeting | |
| 16:30:45 | fwiesel | Thanks | |
| 16:30:47 | bauzas | cool so | |
| 16:30:51 | fwiesel | #info Nothing to report. | |
| 16:30:54 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:30:56 | bauzas | last topic then | |
| 16:30:59 | bauzas | let's be short | |
| 16:31:01 | sean-k-mooney | asuming that merges can you add the next one to the list for review | |
| 16:31:03 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:31:10 | bauzas | I have one thing to raise | |
| 16:31:13 | gibi | I have one too | |
| 16:31:22 | fwiesel | sean-k-mooney: Of course, I'll add that one | |
| 16:31:31 | bauzas | (bauzas) I won't be able to run the next nova meeting | |
| 16:31:52 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove old excludes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917594 | |
| 16:32:00 | bauzas | (I'll take a few days off starting Wed, but I'll need to travel on Tues by 5pm my time) | |
| 16:32:14 | bauzas | so, who can run the meeting in my absence ? | |
| 16:32:19 | dansmith | or just cancel? | |
| 16:32:25 | bauzas | if nobody volunteers, I can cancel | |
| 16:32:28 | bauzas | yeah that | |
| 16:32:44 | gibi | I can run it if needed | |
| 16:33:09 | bauzas | thanks gibi | |
| 16:33:17 | gibi | no problemo | |
| 16:33:18 | bauzas | #action gibi to run next nova meeting | |
| 16:33:24 | bauzas | gibi: shoot your own point | |
| 16:33:31 | gibi | just a heads up | |
| 16:34:15 | gibi | we started a small standup with Uggla_ about his manial series 30 mins twice a week. So far it is Uggla_ and me but eventually we need a second code for the series | |
| 16:34:26 | bauzas | count me on it | |