| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-04-30 | |||
| 15:41:17 | gibi | I know onlu unmaintained it, but for me that is eol :D | |
| 15:43:22 | elodilles | :D yeah, i remember :) | |
| 15:47:45 | bauzas | cool thanks | |
| 15:48:01 | bauzas | sorry guys, I was working hard on a devstack issue, eventually I'm all done \o/ | |
| 15:48:35 | bauzas | fwiw, centos9 has some iptables rule that doesn't accept to forward any IP address :) | |
| 15:48:51 | bauzas | folks, nova meeting now in 12 mins | |
| 15:49:05 | elodilles | no worries, gibi +2+W'd everything ;) | |
| 15:49:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-vif master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/917743 | |
| 15:50:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/917749 | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Apr 30 16:00:12 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:12 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:27 | bauzas | hey folks | |
| 16:00:31 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:00:34 | Uggla_ | o/ | |
| 16:00:37 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:00:39 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:41 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:41 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:00:51 | fwiesel | \o | |
| 16:00:57 | bauzas | cool, let's start | |
| 16:01:06 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:01:12 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:01:19 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:01:23 | bauzas | any bug to report ? | |
| 16:01:51 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:01:56 | bauzas | moving on? | |
| 16:02:19 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:02:24 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:02:29 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:02:34 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:02:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917741 | |
| 16:02:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/917747 | |
| 16:02:41 | bauzas | all greens | |
| 16:02:54 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:03:01 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:03:15 | bauzas | anything about some gate failure you just found ? | |
| 16:03:40 | tkajinam | I noticed that requirements-check job is broken now but I'll talk about that later when we talk about review priorities | |
| 16:03:48 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:04:07 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:04:13 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:04:16 | bauzas | #info Dalmatian-1 in 2 weeks | |
| 16:04:22 | bauzas | #action bauzas to add the nova deadlines in the Dalmatian schedule page | |
| 16:04:36 | bauzas | I'll do this tomorrow (as I'm done with my devstack problems :) ) | |
| 16:04:50 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:04:55 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:05:04 | bauzas | tkajinam: shoot | |
| 16:05:19 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix KeyError on assisted snapshot call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900783 | |
| 16:05:33 | tkajinam | I've added summary to L52 | |
| 16:05:38 | bauzas | I see you added it indeed | |
| 16:05:56 | tkajinam | requirements-check job is currently broken because old excludes were cleaned up in global requirements file | |
| 16:06:36 | tkajinam | because these excludes are no longer maintained in the global requirements repo, I think it makes sense to remove these from individual repo | |
| 16:06:38 | sean-k-mooney | yep it sound like we are missing somethign on the requirement repo to have caught that breakage | |
| 16:06:53 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | and I'm afraid to bump our minimums just because of that | |
| 16:07:39 | sean-k-mooney | so i think its a bug if we do nto bump | |
| 16:07:59 | bauzas | we don't have jobs testing our minimums, right? | |
| 16:08:10 | sean-k-mooney | im not really happy about removing know broken verison and not bumping to a version above them as our minium | |
| 16:08:10 | bauzas | we had that before but we removed it AFAICR | |
| 16:08:20 | sean-k-mooney | correct | |
| 16:08:24 | sean-k-mooney | we dont test our miniums | |
| 16:08:39 | sean-k-mooney | so i would like to rasied them above any version that was listed as know to have issues | |
| 16:08:44 | bauzas | so there is no clear guarantee about the minimums | |
| 16:08:46 | sean-k-mooney | we will still use latest in the jobs | |
| 16:09:03 | bauzas | the problem is simple : we are on a non-SLURP release | |
| 16:09:05 | sean-k-mooney | correct they may be older then we actully require | |
| 16:09:20 | sean-k-mooney | why would htat matter | |
| 16:09:28 | sean-k-mooney | we are allowed to raise minium in non slurps | |
| 16:09:49 | bauzas | oh maybe I was wrong | |
| 16:10:10 | tkajinam | +1 to sean, otherwise we can't implement anything which rely on new os-traits thing during this cycle | |
| 16:10:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/917745 | |
| 16:10:26 | sean-k-mooney | or new release of oslo libs ectra | |
| 16:10:30 | bauzas | if operators skip this release, they still need to upgrade their requirements in the next slurp | |
| 16:10:30 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 16:10:57 | sean-k-mooney | right but that needed anyway | |
| 16:10:57 | tkajinam | so... stepping back to help people with following the discussion there are a few options we have | |
| 16:11:07 | tkajinam | 1. just remove old excludes | |
| 16:11:10 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. what ever release theyre upgrading too then need ot install its deps | |
| 16:11:18 | tkajinam | 2. remove old excludes and bump minimum to effectively excludes these bad versions | |
| 16:11:42 | tkajinam | 3. ask requirements to revert the change | |
| 16:11:53 | tkajinam | 4. loose the validation to ignore mismatch in excludes | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | looks like we went to a corner now we no longer have min reqs | |
| 16:12:11 | sean-k-mooney | i asked tkajinam to do 2 | |
| 16:12:35 | bauzas | the problem is that we only test on gate our latest releases in pip | |
| 16:12:44 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we still have min requirement in our repo we just dont test them | |
| 16:13:13 | sean-k-mooney | so i think min version testing is out of scope for right now | |
| 16:13:25 | gibi | the fact that we are not testing the minimum is true even without the bump, we just don't know that the current minimums are better than the new ones | |
| 16:13:27 | sean-k-mooney | and we should folcus on the 4 optiosn tkajinam has presented | |
| 16:13:36 | bauzas | that's the point, we have minimums for flexibility to make sure that operators don't need to update every dependency to latest everytime, right? | |
| 16:13:51 | sean-k-mooney | kind of | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | our support envelope is really "latest" | |
| 16:14:02 | elodilles | we have this comment in the req.txt: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/requirements.txt#L1-L3 | |
| 16:14:05 | bauzas | which can change during a release cycle | |
| 16:14:07 | sean-k-mooney | its mainly to document to packagers what we thing shoudl work | |
| 16:14:15 | gibi | are there any major bumps in the list? minor bumps should be compatible | |
| 16:14:24 | bauzas | there are | |
| 16:14:36 | bauzas | if we go with bumping | |
| 16:14:49 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: we were already crossing major bondaries | |
| 16:14:52 | bauzas | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/917594/1/requirements.txt#b54 | |