Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-01-13
05:26:47 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_ephemeral_encryption_secret_uuid image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870935
05:26:48 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support snapshot with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870937
05:26:49 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescue with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873675
05:26:49 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebuild and unshelve with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939
05:26:51 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
05:26:51 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Reject (resize|rebuild) API requests with conflicting encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904240
05:26:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Suppport migration with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905512
05:26:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for raw with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/884313
05:26:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for rbd with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889912
07:16:57 opendevreview Jie Song proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Fix image_meta.id within get_mem_encryption_constraint https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904197
09:24:36 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Refactor vf profile for PCI device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905440
10:19:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: make a subelement of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905515
10:19:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for rbd with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889912
13:30:19 opendevreview Jie Song proposed openstack/nova master: hardware: Fix image_meta.id within get_mem_encryption_constraint https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904197
14:56:03 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: create bfv snapshot test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905517
14:56:03 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Fixes bug 2048184 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904817
21:16:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ephemeral encryption + resize: qcow2, raw, rbd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862416
#openstack-nova - 2024-01-14
15:55:59 opendevreview Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Optionally delete mdev on instance cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899407
15:57:58 opendevreview Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Optionally delete mdev on instance cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899407
#openstack-nova - 2024-01-15
07:46:29 gibi let me know if there are urgent+important things I should be aware of
08:17:28 elodilles gibi: welcome back o/ maybe a nice clean cherry pick for an easy start? :D o:) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904371
08:24:10 gibi elodilles: thanks. Easy win indeed. Done
08:24:42 elodilles \o/
08:24:48 elodilles thanks, too
08:28:48 gibi ping me when the next round of backport from that is up
08:31:16 elodilles sure thing :)
08:58:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Reproduce bug #2025480 in a functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904370
09:43:57 bauzas gibi: want some paperwork change ? sure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/905342 :p
09:45:27 gibi bauzas: sure. done.
09:45:33 bauzas <3
09:58:15 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: add the blueprint link to the specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/905342
10:24:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: Do not untrack resources of a server being unshelved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904371
10:45:44 gibi gate seems to be healthy on stable
10:48:31 elodilles gibi: yepp, it looks good \o/ and the 2023.2 version of the backport has merged ;)
10:49:59 elodilles so I've +2'd the patch on 2023.1
11:07:01 gibi elodilles: lets see how the 2023.1 gate performs :)
11:09:00 bauzas fwiw, back in 2024 finding why we race for https://42ba7385992f85feadcc-7de3ea29d2988c6d3fb53b5f30580c1f.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/904177/5/check/nova-tox-functional-py38/b878af0/testr_results.html
11:09:25 bauzas 3 weeks after testing, I don't remember why
11:26:20 sean-k-mooney[m] bauzas: is it because you added the test before https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904209/4
11:30:21 sean-k-mooney[m] i also looks like whatever fixture your using to providie the mdevs likely is not taking effect
12:32:59 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: enforce remote console shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901824
12:36:42 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: enforce remote console shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/901824
12:46:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Reproduce bug #2025480 in a functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/904372
13:01:33 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Allow swap resize from non-zero to zero https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857339
13:01:34 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: temp commit for tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/905597
13:25:35 bauzas sean-k-mooney: nope, sorry but you're wrong, the test works correctly
13:26:23 bauzas I'm running stestr with --until-failure from 2 hours for all functional tests with mdevs, np for the moment
13:27:04 bauzas stestr --test-path=./nova/tests/functional run nova.tests.functional.libvirt.test_vgpu --until-failure
13:27:13 bauzas Ran: 3924 tests in 8192.6080 sec.
13:27:13 bauzas ======
13:27:13 bauzas Totals
13:27:15 bauzas - Passed: 3924
13:27:17 bauzas - Skipped: 0
13:27:19 bauzas - Expected Fail: 0
13:27:21 bauzas - Unexpected Success: 0
13:27:23 bauzas - Failed: 0
13:27:25 bauzas Sum of execute time for each test: 35255.4411 sec.
16:49:46 kashyap zigo: Or anyone: Do you know if #ubuntu-kernel on Libera is still the place to talk to Ubuntu kernel maintainers?
16:50:44 clarkb kashyap: the ubuntu wiki says that is the correct location and the ubuntu security team is in a similarly named channel on libera
16:58:11 kashyap clarkb: Thank you! Mid last year I had chat with 'juergh' about a certain kernel panic. I was hoping to catch them again, but the channel right now has about 4 folks.
17:04:37 sean-k-mooney http://tinyurl.com/bdfk6j9e
17:04:38 kashyap melwitt: dansmith: Hi, so even with CirrOS 0.5.3 (with the updated stable kernel), we're seeing these sort of failures, yeah? - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2018612
17:05:03 sean-k-mooney so for context we have had 226 kernel panics in the last 10 ish days
17:05:05 kashyap (Meta note: If so, we (I can do) have to file a separate issue as per the above)
17:05:23 sean-k-mooney many have been in the cinder project jobs
17:05:27 kashyap sean-k-mooney: Yeah, I was just about to run a query in OpenSearch too; thanks for the link
17:05:39 melwitt kashyap: we're using cirros 0.6.2 and 0.6.1
17:05:43 melwitt orly? ok, that's good to know
17:06:10 kashyap melwitt: Ah, thanks! I'm running on an outdated brain model
17:06:19 melwitt :)
17:06:29 sean-k-mooney they are in neutron, glance, cinder,nova
17:06:55 dansmith the first one i see in that stack from sean-k-mooney is not like the one from the bug kashyap
17:07:21 dansmith it's failing to load userspace libs, which is what sean-k-mooney was mentioning, but is different from the page fault in the bug.. similar time in boot, but different behaivor
17:07:28 sean-k-mooney " Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer "
17:07:34 sean-k-mooney that is form using cirros 5.x
17:07:52 sean-k-mooney its a fixed kernel bug that was just not in the cirros images so we can ignore those
17:09:12 kashyap dansmith: Yeah, the one I just searched for is this (also in melwitt's CI list):
17:09:15 kashyap "Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00001000"
17:09:27 sean-k-mooney right the "/sbin/init: can't load library 'libtirpc.so.3'" is the main painic we still see after the recent changes we made
17:09:37 kashyap The above panic has 36 global hits (12 Tempest) in the last 7 days. Nova and Cinder projects affected
17:10:07 dansmith sean-k-mooney: meaning we see that even with the split boot right?
17:10:18 dansmith I hadn't seen that manifestation until just now
17:10:30 melwitt I guess that's "good" that we can still get some samples for showing kernel devs if we can get some help
17:10:38 dansmith or hadn't noticed. I've mostly been in "see a panic, recheck" mode for a while now
17:10:59 kashyap sean-k-mooney: IIUC, "5.x" needs to 0.5.3 or higher
17:11:16 sean-k-mooney dansmith: yep but form what i have seen its mostly (perhaps always) been a boot form volume test
17:11:48 sean-k-mooney kashyap: i dont think the io api issues was ever fixed in 0.5.3
17:12:00 sean-k-mooney i tried to get it rebuilt but it didnt happen in the past
17:12:26 sean-k-mooney if 0.5.3 happned in the last year then it might have the updated kernel
17:12:38 sean-k-mooney if not then it is still using the old ubuntu package
17:13:17 dansmith sean-k-mooney: ack, but it seems like it's still in initramfs at this point so still seems like bfv "shouldn't matter"
17:13:45 kashyap By the "io api issues" you mean the IO-APIC related patch "no_timer_check" that was at some pointed added to a CirrOS image?
17:14:11 sean-k-mooney kashyap: no
17:14:41 sean-k-mooney the reason this happens in 5.2 for example is ubuntu had already fixed the kernel bug but cirros was not rebuilt with the fixed kernel package
17:14:42 kashyap sean-k-mooney: CirrOS 0.5.3 happened in May 2023 (after the bug Dan filed): https://github.com/cirros-dev/cirros/releases/tag/0.5.3
17:14:44 sean-k-mooney eventhough it was released
17:15:20 sean-k-mooney ok so it did hapen in the last year
17:16:03 kashyap Yep; I filed this request after Dan's bug above: https://github.com/cirros-dev/cirros/issues/102
17:16:11 sean-k-mooney i asked to do this 2-3 years ago and they said no at the time
17:16:50 kashyap Maybe because at that time the older kernel was still "in support"

Earlier   Later