Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-09-12
16:12:22 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html
16:12:25 bauzas #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:12:28 bauzas #info 2 days before RC1
16:12:32 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-rc-potential Etherpad for tracking RCs
16:12:44 bauzas basically all the needed changes are approved now,
16:12:55 bauzas the cycle highlights got a correct round of reviews
16:13:08 bauzas so I'll prepare the reno prelude patch based on the highlights tomorrow morning
16:14:53 bauzas ok, let's jump then
16:15:30 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:15:59 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:16:04 bauzas #info As a reminder, people eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for asking cores to also review
16:16:08 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:16:20 bauzas elodilles: please help me by stopping my monolog :)
16:16:26 elodilles :)
16:16:33 elodilles #info first stable/2023.2 branches were cut (libraries & client libraries), rest will be cut this week with rc1 patches
16:16:44 elodilles #info all stable gates should be OK, though not much activity on stable branches these days
16:16:51 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:17:02 elodilles that's all from me
16:17:32 auniyal #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/release-liaison-PatchesToReview
16:17:32 auniyal #info most of these already have one +2.
16:17:32 auniyal #info Please{10} *review* these backport patches of stable 2023.1, zed and yoga for next minor release
16:17:47 bauzas cool, I'll do a round of reviews
16:17:55 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:18:00 bauzas I have one
16:18:04 bauzas (bauzas) Can't chair next meeting, who else ?
16:18:04 bauzas (bauzas) Can't chair next meeting, who else ?
16:18:37 bauzas (I'll need to attend a parent-teacher meeting for my daughter's class next week)
16:19:04 bauzas so, any volunteer ?
16:19:18 gibi if nobody else then I will
16:19:33 bauzas 1..
16:19:37 sean-k-mooney i have i have one or two topics to bring up quickly. thanks gibi
16:20:00 bauzas sean-k-mooney: you mean, you appreciate gibi for chairing next week ? :)
16:20:06 sean-k-mooney yes
16:20:10 bauzas cool
16:20:12 bauzas 2..
16:20:14 bauzas 3..
16:20:16 bauzas sold
16:20:25 bauzas #info gibi will chair next week's meeting
16:20:29 sean-k-mooney i could proably do it if he is not around for any reason i just dont want too :)
16:20:36 gibi sure I will do it
16:20:42 bauzas sean-k-mooney: shoot your own topics (even if I can guess one)
16:20:58 sean-k-mooney first one is this stable only patch that we agreed to do a year ago
16:21:00 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/828979
16:21:07 sean-k-mooney im reviewing it now
16:21:10 sean-k-mooney and it looks ok
16:21:20 sean-k-mooney so just wanted to highlight it to others
16:21:38 sean-k-mooney the second quetion is semi procedural
16:21:42 bauzas want it for Bobcat ?
16:21:50 bauzas nvm, stupid me
16:22:01 sean-k-mooney its for victoria
16:22:05 bauzas yeah, hence me stupid
16:22:22 sean-k-mooney so second question is we were discussing on the mailing list about removing the hyperv driver
16:22:29 sean-k-mooney and vmeare next cycle
16:22:36 bauzas yeah and I provided my humble guts
16:22:46 sean-k-mooney we can chat about that in the ptg if needed
16:22:55 sean-k-mooney but i was wondering do we need a spec
16:23:02 bauzas which are, unless extremely necessary, avoid any virt driver deprecation this cycle
16:23:07 sean-k-mooney or just come to agreement and specless blueprint
16:23:08 bauzas s/deprecation/removal
16:23:27 bauzas for removing those from our tree ?
16:23:35 sean-k-mooney we deprecated them in antileop and marked them experimental
16:23:45 sean-k-mooney so in caracal i want to remove them form the nova tree
16:23:47 bauzas yeah I know hence my sedf
16:24:17 gibi I don't think we need a spec to delete things
16:24:21 bauzas yeah, so, procedurally, I'd say "mail ML ops" wins against any other paperwork
16:24:40 bauzas I just want the ops to be aware of the cut
16:24:52 bauzas and yeah, it doesn't require a blueprint
16:24:55 bauzas a relnote, for sure
16:25:17 gmann bauzas: sean-k-mooney I am planning the hyperv removal and other os-win cleanup/retirement in 2024.1 only
16:25:18 bauzas this is just a removal patch
16:25:20 sean-k-mooney ok well we can chat about it more in the ptg i guess and send a mail to that list
16:25:29 bauzas but yeah, communication matters
16:25:38 gmann this is whole stack #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:retire-winstackers
16:25:39 sean-k-mooney gmann: yep this is all in the context of 2024.1
16:25:45 gmann yeah
16:25:51 sean-k-mooney i just wanted to know how to track this
16:25:58 gmann and I need to add a spec also as it impact one API too
16:26:17 gmann so all those we can discuss together in PTG
16:26:21 bauzas when we removed nova-net, this wasn't tracked by a blueprint
16:26:25 gmann sean-k-mooney: yeah, will add BP and spec
16:26:37 bauzas and this was having API implications
16:26:50 sean-k-mooney im not sure what api impact this will have
16:27:03 gmann I will propose that, its rdp console I think
16:27:08 bauzas tbc, I don't want us to paperwork any removal
16:27:20 sean-k-mooney ah rdp
16:27:27 bauzas a deprecation for sure, but this was communicated way in advance
16:27:30 sean-k-mooney i think that kind of seperate
16:27:34 gmann spec is worth here so that we do not miss anything
16:27:54 sean-k-mooney it should be sperate commits at least but ok
16:27:55 gmann especially API change point of view
16:27:56 bauzas then, I defer this discussion to the PTG
16:28:01 sean-k-mooney i think we can wrap the meeting there
16:28:05 bauzas we need more contact
16:28:08 bauzas context
16:28:10 bauzas doh
16:28:12 gmann sure, will propose the spec meanhwile and can discuss in PTG
16:28:22 bauzas sean-k-mooney: wanted to discuss the SQLA 1.4 backref thing ?
16:28:35 sean-k-mooney am i kind of forgot
16:28:51 sean-k-mooney so stephen has updated the patchs to address the comment you raised
16:28:51 bauzas to be frank, I already made a round of reviews

Earlier   Later