Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-09-05
16:12:50 bauzas okay, so we'll see if next round it fails again
16:13:11 bauzas any other gate information to share ?
16:14:25 dansmith otherwise I think the gate is doing better than it has in a while
16:14:37 dansmith we still need volume test attention like we have for many years
16:14:45 dansmith but life isn't as terrible as it has been
16:15:20 bauzas glad to hear such good news
16:15:45 bauzas which weren't arriving just because of luck
16:15:58 bauzas so kudos to those who worked hard on chasing
16:16:21 bauzas moving on then
16:16:23 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:16:28 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html
16:16:32 bauzas #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:16:47 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-blueprint-status Etherpad for tracking blueprints status
16:16:51 bauzas #info 9 blueprints were implemented this cycle, 8 got deferred (5 of them were awaiting rebases from owner)
16:17:04 bauzas thanks folks who reviewed features
16:17:23 sean-k-mooney just on last thing on nova-emulation. we didn not pin that job to < 6 concurancy so maybe we need to drop that back to 4
16:17:33 bauzas despite a very few of happy reviewers, we were able to merge a quite decent number of reviews
16:17:50 bauzas s/reviews/changes
16:17:52 gmann sean-k-mooney: but is it oom issue happening there?
16:18:08 sean-k-mooney i dont think so ill look after the meeting
16:18:26 sean-k-mooney i just assume since this is testing qemu with emulation of arm it might be slower
16:18:54 sean-k-mooney anyway we can go back to the release topic
16:19:05 gmann ack
16:19:14 bauzas sean-k-mooney: thanks
16:19:23 bauzas so, I was just saying thanks
16:20:03 bauzas we still have a couple of series that missed the target, but most of them were mostly due to merge conflicts or other states that aren't "shit, we missed to review that"
16:20:29 sean-k-mooney there was one that kind fo fell in that camp
16:20:33 bauzas we still have two long series that require proper attention next cycle if they're reproposed, as those series are very long and hard to review
16:20:36 sean-k-mooney the virtio-packed ring format
16:21:11 bauzas it was in merge conflict until last week
16:21:25 bauzas actually, until today
16:21:36 bauzas so no, it was still on the camp "the owner has to do things"
16:21:36 sean-k-mooney no it ws mergable a mount ago
16:21:43 sean-k-mooney and then went int merge conflcit in between
16:21:47 bauzas sure
16:22:10 sean-k-mooney i had tought we merged it
16:22:11 bauzas but I raised a couple of times the fact that we are requiring a correct state of a patch for being reviewed
16:22:25 sean-k-mooney it was kasyaps min version bump that caused the merge conflict
16:22:31 bauzas and it was correctly tracked in the etherpad as being 'in merge conflict'
16:22:52 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I bet no, since it was on merge conflict *before* we merged the min version bump
16:23:13 sean-k-mooney anyway im sad that missed but it is what it is
16:23:13 bauzas but I can doublecheck the timings based on the etherpad history
16:23:27 dansmith yeah I think it was in merge conflict before
16:23:40 bauzas again, that one was correctly tracked and marked as not reviewable yet
16:23:59 sean-k-mooney i had put review priorty +2 on it for what its worth
16:24:16 sean-k-mooney i think part of the miss there may have been pto related
16:24:22 bauzas so, I 'm against granting an exception for it (and even not considering the object version change, which is kinda huge to consider)
16:24:37 sean-k-mooney im not asking for one
16:25:00 sean-k-mooney but i i had realised it was not merged last week i would he pinned them to update it
16:25:18 bauzas we're providing weekly meeting updates for such concerns
16:25:31 bauzas I can't just ping every single owner to ask him or her to update
16:25:47 bauzas it was tracked, an action was awaited
16:26:36 bauzas anyway, like I said a couple of hours before, a reproposal is surely acceptable for 2024.1 and can be reviewed in 2 weeks, once master becomes Caracal
16:26:51 sean-k-mooney yep
16:27:21 sean-k-mooney we also shoudl have landed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860829 by the way
16:28:00 sean-k-mooney that is needed for the swithc to sqlalchme 2
16:28:05 bauzas this isn't a feature, and according isn't impacted by FF
16:28:17 bauzas so it can be reviewed now until RC1
16:28:18 dansmith it's also not release critical for 2023.2 AFAIK
16:28:32 bauzas and which gives me the right opportunity to jump to the next item
16:28:43 bauzas #info 1 week before RC1
16:28:49 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-rc-potential Etherpad for tracking RCs
16:29:24 bauzas if people would enjoy clicking on such link (exactly like they hopefully did for the feature tracking etherpad just before),
16:29:51 bauzas they'll see that there are a couple of paperwork-ish but important changes to deliver before RC1
16:30:17 bauzas mostly for upgrade concerns (rpc aliases and object version tagging)
16:30:48 bauzas in that etherpad, people are fancy adding patches if they feel that require to be merged before RC1
16:32:42 bauzas but, I'll ping people anyway asking for reviews
16:33:05 bauzas I haven't yet prepared a bobcat tag for bug reports, I'm just doing it now
16:34:02 bauzas there
16:34:23 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=bobcat-rc-potential feel free to tag any bug report with this tag in order to have it tracked for RC1 and post-RCs
16:34:24 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova master: [FUP] [ironic] Fix for mutable nova-cpu configs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893790
16:35:03 bauzas moving on
16:35:07 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:35:16 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:35:20 bauzas #info As a reminder, people eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for asking cores to also review
16:35:27 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:35:35 bauzas elodilles: tell the good news
16:35:38 elodilles o7
16:35:41 elodilles #info stable/train is marked as End of Life and branch is deleted
16:35:46 bauzas \o/
16:35:52 elodilles #info all stable gates should be OK
16:36:00 bauzas \o/
16:36:02 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:36:26 elodilles please add there gate issues if you encounter one ^^^
16:36:32 elodilles and that's all from me
16:36:37 sean-k-mooney elodilles: what was the result of testing os-vif stable
16:36:48 bauzas thanks elodilles
16:37:01 sean-k-mooney did the job fail? i.e. should i look at why or did it pass on your DNM patch
16:37:04 elodilles sean-k-mooney: let me check it quickly
16:37:11 sean-k-mooney no rush
16:37:19 sean-k-mooney if it failed i can try and take a look at why later
16:37:41 bauzas auniyal: you had other items to mention
16:37:47 elodilles sean-k-mooney: gate tests have passed
16:37:52 sean-k-mooney sweet
16:38:02 auniyal #info Please{10} *review* these backport patches of stable 2023.1, zed and yoga for next minor release
16:38:09 auniyal #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/release-liaison-PatchesToReview
16:38:09 auniyal #info most of these already have one +2.
16:38:15 auniyal thanks
16:38:43 bauzas cool, will try a round tomorrow
16:39:11 bauzas sounds to me it's important to deliver a 2023.1 release shortly

Earlier   Later