Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-09-04
10:09:26 sean-k-mooney but you can and in this case that is proably what you want to do
10:09:43 sean-k-mooney if you want to resrict an az to a tenant and not have them ever get out of sync
10:10:21 sahid i'm glad it's exactly what I was needed :-)
10:10:26 sahid thanks you admin1, sean-k-mooney
12:49:06 elodilles bauzas auniyal : hi, i've updated the hash in the yoga release patch, please review it and then we can merge it: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/889517
12:49:17 bauzas cool cool
12:53:28 elodilles thanks o/
13:25:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: [alembic] Alembic operations require keywords only arguments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883344
13:49:05 auniyal thanks elodilles
13:52:14 elodilles np :)
14:24:31 sean-k-mooney hi folks what should i be setting oc_header too in vars.yaml?
14:26:19 sean-k-mooney oh wrong window...
#openstack-nova - 2023-09-05
03:10:04 opendevreview OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648
08:38:09 bauzas sean-k-mooney: can you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462 ?
08:49:55 sean-k-mooney i need to leave fo a doctors approintment soon but ill take a look at it today
08:57:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648
09:58:06 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
10:10:32 plibeau hello guys, I need your help on this change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861172
12:21:41 dvo-plv sean-k-mooney, dansmith Uggla sahid Hello, Mayby you will have a chance to review patchset https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
12:27:26 sean-k-mooney dvo-plv: unfortunetlly we are past feature freeze fo this cycle
12:28:26 sean-k-mooney i could take a look but it cant merge until next cycle after RC1 is cut so thats 2-3 weeks form now
12:29:18 sean-k-mooney bauzas: unless we want to consider a FFE for ^
12:29:28 sean-k-mooney i was +2 on it a month ago
12:29:42 sean-k-mooney it would have been nice to land that but we are now out of time
12:30:25 bauzas I'm not super happy to create a FFE for this due to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075/23/nova/objects/image_meta.py
12:30:49 dvo-plv I see,maybe it will be good to take a look, if you have new comments, we will have a time to fix until next cycle
12:31:55 bauzas I'd prefer to look at it in two weeks, after RC1 while the 2023.2 branch is created and then master is for 2024.1
12:39:19 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
13:05:39 opendevreview Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
14:20:22 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: doc: mark the maximum microversion for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893742
14:26:15 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Update compute rpc alias for bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893744
14:26:25 ygk_12345 some of my nodes in an aggregate dont have the aggregate mapping in the placement db for those nodes
14:26:34 ygk_12345 is this a bug in nova ?
14:27:18 ygk_12345 i am trying to use the command "openstack resource provider aggregate list <resource-id>
14:27:42 ygk_12345 that is returning empty result for those nodes in that aggregate
14:28:16 ygk_12345 i tried placement syc aggregates also
14:28:20 ygk_12345 but no result
14:28:37 ygk_12345 *sync
14:36:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits: PCPU and documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462
14:41:14 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add service version for Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893749
14:49:43 ygk_12345 any idea anyone ?
14:50:37 dansmith ygk_12345: not really enough information to say (like which release are you running?) but in general the placement aggregates should match the nova ones, yes
14:51:04 ygk_12345 dansmith: it is yoga
14:52:24 ygk_12345 the aggregate matching ismissing for one set of nodes in the az
14:53:26 dansmith ygk_12345: and that set of nodes is different how?
14:54:01 ygk_12345 dansmith: they are just added to the az along with others
14:56:02 ygk_12345 do I need to manually add all these nodes from that aggregate to match that aggregate using the command openstack resource provider aggregate set ?
14:56:40 ygk_12345 it succeeded for one node now
14:56:44 dansmith ygk_12345: when you add a node to an aggregate in nova, it should mirror that to placement for you
14:56:56 ygk_12345 but why did not it add those nodes automatically ?
14:57:41 ygk_12345 dansmith: but it did not do so for an aggregate
14:58:46 dansmith ygk_12345: not sure what to say without logs and things... try removing it from the aggregate in nova, re-add it and look at the nova-api logs to see if there's a failure talking to placement or something
14:59:05 ygk_12345 dansmith: ok
15:00:19 bauzas reminder: nova meeting in 1 hour
15:00:53 bauzas ygk_12345: we have some method that calls placement for creating the same aggregates, sec
15:01:35 ygk_12345 bauzas: ok
15:01:45 ygk_12345 bauzas: please let me know
15:04:33 bauzas eventually found the change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/553597
15:07:31 ygk_12345 bauzas: I have removed and re added and now it is working. Thank you
15:07:44 bauzas ok good to know
15:09:28 dansmith ygk_12345: that likely means nova-api wasn't able to talk to placement at the time you added those nodes originally, for whatever reason
15:09:57 ygk_12345 dansmith: seems so. Thanks for your time and patience
16:00:02 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:02 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:02 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Sep 5 16:00:02 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:02 bauzas #startmeeting nova
16:00:07 bauzas welcome folks
16:00:08 gibi o/
16:00:11 Uggla o/
16:00:11 sean-k-mooney o/
16:00:14 elodilles o/
16:00:15 bauzas #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:00:15 auniyal o/
16:00:36 dansmith o/
16:00:47 bauzas cool, people arriving fast, lovin'
16:00:50 bauzas let's start
16:00:57 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:01:02 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:01:06 bauzas whoops
16:01:08 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:01:14 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 49 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting)
16:01:18 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:01:23 bauzas #info bug baton is bauzas
16:01:34 auniyal bauzas, I have few bugs to discuss
16:01:36 bauzas auniyal: any questions you have ?
16:01:40 bauzas cool, shoot
16:02:01 auniyal actully this : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20230902
16:02:21 bauzas ack, looking
16:02:27 auniyal https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2031635:
16:02:42 auniyal ack
16:03:50 bauzas I'm not expert, I can't tell
16:04:20 auniyal I'll paste the quick ones here
16:04:29 auniyal https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2033393: Xena: server name is not updated in guest xml after rename ?
16:04:42 gmann o/
16:04:53 gibi so for 2031635 we need to check if https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867788 is backported to stables or not
16:05:01 auniyal is it known ? does it does affect an operation
16:05:35 bauzas let's not discuss the resolution here
16:05:49 auniyal gibi, its not backported
16:06:00 gibi auniyal: then I guess we need to backport it
16:06:05 gibi as we need to support py3.8

Earlier   Later