Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-08-31
18:55:20 zer0c00l sean-k-mooney: FYI https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2033681
19:06:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Deprecate ironic.peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883346
19:06:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457
19:06:40 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889947
21:00:23 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Limit nodes by ironic shard key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886980
21:00:31 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Modify the comment that is confused https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/809948
21:02:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284
21:02:34 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update serial console example client for py3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878080
21:02:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove unused mocks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867789
21:02:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix tox docs target https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891033
21:48:44 sean-k-mooney melwitt: o/
21:49:43 melwitt sean-k-mooney: o/
21:50:48 sean-k-mooney so the way the doc and porting tool are managing vcpu quota is not correct
21:50:51 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891646/5/nova/cmd/manage.py#3461
21:51:13 sean-k-mooney but i think we can adress both of those issues in a followup patch
21:51:45 sean-k-mooney when migrating the quota on flavor.vcpu it should not be mapped 1:1 to the vcpu resouce class limit exclively
21:51:58 sean-k-mooney we need to also set the same limit for PCPUs
21:52:30 sean-k-mooney since flavor.vcpu can be either VCPU alloctions , PCPU alloctions or both in the case of a vm with mixed cpus
21:52:55 sean-k-mooney so while that has the downside of effectivly doubling the qutoa for cpus
21:53:11 sean-k-mooney i think its the only way to avoid over quota issues in general
21:53:43 melwitt sean-k-mooney: hm, ok
21:54:06 sean-k-mooney since we have not made the new quota driver the default
21:54:10 sean-k-mooney just deprecated the old one
21:54:16 sean-k-mooney im fine with doing that in a followup
21:54:25 melwitt sean-k-mooney: you've reminded me there's a config option around this https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#workarounds.unified_limits_count_pcpu_as_vcpu
21:54:33 melwitt as well
21:54:50 sean-k-mooney oh ya there is/was
21:54:56 melwitt ack. I'm working on follow up stuff
21:55:27 sean-k-mooney i have approved the two patches as they are since for most peopel it will do what they need
21:56:10 melwitt thank you
21:57:10 sean-k-mooney no worreis i came online to do that before i head to bed so ill chat to you soon o/
21:57:46 melwitt sean-k-mooney: thanks 🙏 ttyl o/
21:57:46 melwitt sean-k-mooney: thanks � ttyl o/
23:54:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add 'limits migrate_to_unified_limits' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891646
23:54:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add documentation for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893127
#openstack-nova - 2023-09-01
04:44:37 opendevreview OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891648
04:56:39 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU} for "Bobcat" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/887255
06:01:31 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462
06:03:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits: PCPU and documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462
06:04:39 melwitt johnthetubaguy, bauzas, sean-k-mooney: followup for unified limits to handle PCPU and add a bit more detail to docs ^ thanks
06:20:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up for unified limits: PCPU and documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893462
06:33:57 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893464
06:33:58 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893465
06:33:59 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893466
06:35:30 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893467
06:47:10 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Adds regression functional test for 1980720 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893468
06:47:11 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893469
06:47:12 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893470
06:47:13 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893471
06:47:14 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893472
07:27:41 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Adds regression functional test for 1980720 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893474
07:27:42 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Refactor CinderFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893475
07:27:43 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893476
07:27:44 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893477
07:27:45 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/893478
07:40:52 bauzas morning folks
07:52:47 bauzas melwitt: on it
07:53:02 bauzas thanks for the quick follow-ups
07:53:47 bauzas auniyal: your series was tagged as a blueprint
07:54:17 bauzas auniyal: accordingly, you can't backport it in stable branches as it would change a behavior
07:57:25 bauzas see the backport policy rules that are given here https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#appropriate-fixes
08:07:08 ykarel Hi is there some known issue with test_reboot_server_hard, recently saw many failures
08:07:45 ykarel Fails like AssertionError: time.struct_time(tm_year=2023, tm_mon=9, tm_mday=1, tm_hour=7, tm_min=26, tm_sec=24, tm_wday=4, tm_yday=244, tm_isdst=0) not greater than time.struct_time(tm_year=2023, tm_mon=9, tm_mday=1, tm_hour=7, tm_min=26, tm_sec=24, tm_wday=4, tm_yday=244, tm_isdst=0)
08:14:39 ykarel k didn't find a bug report, so reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/2033752
08:14:45 ykarel it's started just few hours back
08:41:58 bauzas ykarel: oh
08:42:08 bauzas probably related to some recent merge we did
08:42:47 bauzas because now we call Cinder when rebooting so the performance could be impactedcx
08:53:01 frickler elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871968 is still blocked by your W-1, can you please check?
08:54:29 frickler bauzas: calling cinder for a reboot? I'm curious about that, do you happen to have a reference?
08:55:08 frickler ah, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 ?
08:55:12 bauzas frickler: see the bug report
08:55:16 bauzas yea
08:56:44 elodilles frickler: looking, thanks
08:57:03 bauzas sean-k-mooney: dansmith: auniyal: looks like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 created a gate issue
08:57:04 frickler a reno referencing "this change" is weird wording btw
08:57:44 bauzas frickler: we can modify this
08:57:53 auniyal bauzas, ack
08:58:04 bauzas in general we say "Now, Nova does X or Y"
08:58:26 bauzas or "With this new feature named "blah", now we have"
09:02:15 bauzas auniyal: I'm working on a patch that will conditionnally check the volumes if only BDMs exist
09:02:51 auniyal ack bauzas, any thing I can help with
09:03:43 bauzas we may need core reviewers
09:04:36 frickler elodilles: thx, now just someone needs to retrigger the W+1 I think
09:09:03 elodilles frickler: i did it just before you wrote :)
09:10:09 bauzas auniyal: actually, we can't avoid a Cinder API call for getting the volumes
09:10:53 bauzas volume attachments*
09:11:02 auniyal yeah, I was about to say
09:11:11 auniyal saw the comment on bug report
09:11:56 auniyal cinder calls are separate from bdms what nova have
09:12:25 auniyal can we increase reboot time check ?
09:14:41 bauzas oh wait
09:15:09 bauzas this isn't calculating the time it boots
09:15:15 bauzas this is just getting the uptime
09:19:50 SvenKieske systemd-analyze time gives you boot times :)
09:20:04 SvenKieske without any context
09:23:38 bauzas that's weird then
09:24:04 bauzas https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/28ba6ee268bdf5d18a13a0dc7c7fea2c3a3dfcce/tempest/common/utils/linux/remote_client.py#L84-L88 is just giving me when the server was booted
09:24:56 bauzas and https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_server_actions.py#L127-L128 is just comparing the timestamps to check that the VM was actually rebooted
09:25:11 bauzas this isn't at all a performance check

Earlier   Later