| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-27 | |||
| 19:42:04 | dansmith | oh, qemu.conf, interesting | |
| 19:42:13 | dansmith | well, I dunno what to say | |
| 19:42:16 | dansmith | we don't support lxc | |
| 19:42:28 | dansmith | I don't want to break it for no reason, but... unless someone is going to try out a change... | |
| 19:42:31 | sean-k-mooney | ill try chanign my lvm devstack to file and see if it changes to tcp | |
| 19:46:19 | sean-k-mooney | no still using pty | |
| 19:46:27 | sean-k-mooney | ok im going ot leave it there today | |
| 19:47:08 | gmann | this test was wrong since starting and not sure how https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/889109 unhide it on lvm and made it always failing | |
| 19:47:26 | gmann | 889109 does not change anything from this test perspective | |
| 19:47:32 | frickler | oh, interesting, iirc there is still a kolla bug about dos via console log filling the disk. I need to look into that | |
| 19:48:03 | sean-k-mooney | my cloud is not fully up to date | |
| 19:48:09 | frickler | gmann: interaction with other tests in the class? | |
| 19:48:19 | dansmith | frickler: I doubt it | |
| 19:48:24 | sean-k-mooney | but on the kolla sid i jsu tnotice that libvirtd.conf is configured to connect to libvirt with sasl over tcp | |
| 19:48:32 | dansmith | it may be because this change does increase the load with more parallelism, | |
| 19:48:37 | gmann | frickler: humm, no, it recreate the server in setup and keep it SSHABLE | |
| 19:48:58 | dansmith | however this test class was usually running early on enough that all the workers were slammed with work | |
| 19:49:04 | dansmith | I looked at a *lot* of stackviz reports before doing that :) | |
| 19:49:06 | sean-k-mooney | https://paste.opendev.org/show/bZMoOYeTqbcHyr79ZDwS/ | |
| 19:50:09 | gmann | dansmith: i doubt, server was active always in any parallel case in setup so it should have been working in same way it was working before | |
| 19:50:39 | dansmith | gmann: I agree, I'm just saying load can be higher with the split, but that was the point | |
| 19:51:07 | dansmith | I just rechecked sean-k-mooney's patch to get another data point.. i.e. to see if it's still only lvm and only that test | |
| 19:51:20 | gmann | anyways as 889895 corrent the tests and make it fail always. I am going to skip this test for now until we figure out the nova behavior in 'guest shutoff' case | |
| 19:51:25 | gmann | *coprrect | |
| 19:52:04 | dansmith | ack | |
| 21:10:25 | frickler | maybe this is related, since it has been moved to a different class https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_server_actions.py#L332-L337 | |
| 21:10:47 | frickler | also expected failures on the tempest patch going back to yoga, so not a recent regression at least | |
| 21:22:12 | gmann | but that was same before moving to different class also. this test s no issue, test_get_console_output_server_id_in_shutoff_status started failing after refactoring and not sure why | |
| 21:24:36 | gmann | or maybe you are right. the execution order of test in same class might be making the server console available before test_get_console_output_server_id_in_shutoff_status execute | |
| 21:29:41 | dansmith | how? | |
| 21:30:15 | dansmith | each class gets its own server to work on, and the tests within a class are single-threaded. if it matters now, it mattered before, so it must have already been broken | |
| 21:37:25 | gmann | one chance I see if that self.server_id server get through many operation before test_get_console_output_server_id_in_shutoff_status was executed before so console of that self.server_id was somehow available but now as it is in separate class, self.server_id is kind of fresh server and fail ? | |
| 21:37:46 | gmann | idk but that is something might be happening, i cannot find any other reasoning on this | |
| 21:50:29 | gmann | correcting and skipping this test for now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/889895 | |
| 22:15:53 | dansmith | yeah I don't think so.. at one point I was wondering if we had to call get_console once to process the pty data and start the log file, but with virtlogd that should definitely not be the case | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-07-28 | |||
| 04:21:45 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support create with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870932 | |
| 04:21:46 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_ephemeral_encryption_secret_uuid image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870935 | |
| 04:21:46 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support resize with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870933 | |
| 04:21:47 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support snapshot with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870937 | |
| 04:21:47 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to qemu-img rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870936 | |
| 04:21:48 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Support rescue with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873675 | |
| 04:21:48 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebuild and unshelve with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939 | |
| 04:21:49 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273 | |
| 04:21:50 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP rbd imagebackend support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889912 | |
| 04:21:50 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP raw imagebackend support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/884313 | |
| 04:30:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ephemeral encryption + resize: qcow2, raw, rbd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862416 | |
| 04:37:19 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test ephemeral encryption + resize: qcow2, raw, rbd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862416 | |
| 09:23:08 | Uggla | bauzas, I'm gonna push the series using the SDK in a couple of minutes, just finishing it is working well in devstack. Then I will introduce the manila lock api calls. | |
| 09:23:16 | bauzas | ++ | |
| 09:24:24 | Uggla | this is on par with the previous code except the sdk for the moment. | |
| 09:27:01 | Uggla | maybe more than a couple of minutes, I'm running functional tests and devstack in //. My cpu is 100% and the machine is slow as hell. | |
| 09:53:29 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193 | |
| 09:53:29 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow config to support virtiofs (driver) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886522 | |
| 09:53:30 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194 | |
| 09:53:30 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401 | |
| 09:53:32 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090 | |
| 09:53:33 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075 | |
| 09:53:34 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881472 | |
| 09:53:36 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500 | |
| 09:53:37 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823 | |
| 09:53:38 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284 | |
| 09:53:38 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824 | |
| 09:53:39 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285 | |
| 09:53:40 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287 | |
| 09:53:40 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286 | |
| 09:53:41 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883862 | |
| 09:53:41 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860288 | |
| 09:53:42 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (compute manager) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885751 | |
| 09:53:43 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830 | |
| 09:53:43 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (only API exception) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885752 | |
| 09:53:45 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885753 | |
| 09:53:45 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499 | |
| 09:53:47 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028 | |
| 09:53:47 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501 | |
| 09:53:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282 | |
| 09:53:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029 | |
| 09:53:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086 | |
| 09:53:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283 | |
| 09:53:53 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642 | |
| 09:53:53 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087 | |
| 11:20:38 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457 | |
| 11:20:39 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889947 | |
| 11:20:39 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 | |
| 11:24:02 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889947 | |
| 11:24:02 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457 | |
| 11:24:03 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 | |
| 11:54:29 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Add function to get all attachments in Cinder.API module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457 | |
| 11:54:30 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284 | |
| 11:54:30 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889947 | |
| 15:41:42 | opendevreview | Danila Balagansky proposed openstack/nova master: Show free vCPUs in HostState __repr__ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886400 | |
| 17:26:57 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: it can proably wait till monday but did we decied a direction for fixing the nova-lvm job | |
| 17:27:04 | sean-k-mooney | have we temporally skipped it | |
| 17:27:15 | dansmith | yeah gmann skipped it IIRC | |
| 17:27:30 | sean-k-mooney | well the test. ok i just didnt want to leave it blocked over the weekend | |
| 17:27:41 | sean-k-mooney | hopefully some things can merge | |
| 17:28:01 | dansmith | hopefully, although it wasn't blocking any of my stuff and I'm having a hard enough time as it is :/ | |
| 17:28:22 | dansmith | zuul is currently taunting me with three patches in the gate queue all currently passing everything | |
| 17:28:29 | dansmith | it likes to wait until the very end to fail one job while I'm not looking | |
| 17:28:56 | dansmith | usually just one in the bottom most patch so the rest have to go through a recheck which takes about 20 tries to make it back to gate | |
| 17:29:37 | sean-k-mooney | ack well the reason i ask other then the fact you were here yestereday when we were debugging it was to know if it was blocking your stuff | |