Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-07-18
16:35:14 elodilles i saw it passing
16:35:31 sean-k-mooney perhaps validation are enabeld on yoga already?
16:35:37 sean-k-mooney for ceph
16:35:52 elodilles good question
16:36:01 sean-k-mooney we can check after the meeting
16:36:20 elodilles yepp
16:36:41 bauzas cool
16:36:55 bauzas can we move on ?
16:37:09 auniyal thats all from my side thanks
16:37:09 auniyal bauzas, I targeted to do minor release tomorrow 19th July, but most of them are not merged yet, so will wait till next wednesday
16:37:15 bauzas ack
16:38:41 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:38:47 bauzas nothing on the agenda
16:38:52 bauzas anything anyone ?
16:40:27 bauzas ok, let's give you back 20 mins
16:40:29 bauzas thanks all
16:40:33 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.log.html
16:40:33 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.txt
16:40:33 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-07-18-16.00.html
16:40:33 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 18 16:40:33 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:40:33 bauzas #endmeeting
16:40:40 elodilles thanks o/
16:41:13 elodilles auniyal: thanks for dealing with the release, ping me if i can help with anything about it!
16:42:00 gibi o/
16:42:38 auniyal ack elodilles, only thing we need is more reviews, most of the +2 are from you only, thanks
16:43:05 sean-k-mooney elodilles: ill pull https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888230 back without any deps and we can see if it passes on yoga
16:43:19 sean-k-mooney if not ill add the devstack and devstack-plugin-ceph pathces too
16:43:53 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ack, sounds like a plan! thanks :)
16:55:18 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/yoga: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888784
17:49:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Drop Fedora support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886596
18:25:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] Cap virtualenv/setuptools https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888681
18:52:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/zed: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888230
#openstack-nova - 2023-07-19
08:53:43 dvo-plv Hello, Community
08:54:19 dvo-plv Maybe you will have a chance to review this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075
11:02:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: enable validations in nova-lvm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/888784
11:37:48 elodilles bauzas: sorry, my OCD couldn't leave the 'unrelated whatespace change' in the train-eol patch o:) could you please +1 it, to have PTL-Approved triggered on the patch? o:)
11:37:51 elodilles https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885365
11:37:52 elodilles bauzas: ^^^
12:19:15 bauzas elodilles: done
12:35:12 elodilles thx o/
13:02:38 kashyap Hm, this timeout looks like an unrelated failure to me - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791
13:02:48 kashyap (From the test test_resize_volume_backed_server_confirm)
13:13:22 sean-k-mooney the connection to iscsid failed https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#60338
13:13:45 sean-k-mooney which later cased Jul 18 14:24:29.793214 np0034705382 nova-compute[74276]: ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server [None req-bfe53067-f154-48c3-8bd7-141efbfa7eba tempest-ServerActionsV293TestJSON-1087987645 tempest-ServerActionsV293TestJSON-1087987645-project-member] Exception during message handling: ValueError: Circular reference detected
13:13:55 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8525a961871c4602bedf3df605f72791/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#60449
13:14:02 sean-k-mooney i have not seen that in a very long time
13:43:26 dansmith kashyap: I saw one of that test failing just now too
13:43:53 dansmith the test failure maybe kinda looked like it didn't actually rebuild the guest, because the host key didn't match (or something)
13:45:19 kashyap dansmith: Aah, I see. The host key mismatch means hopeffully it's a transient issue
13:45:33 dansmith well, I dunno, if we just saw two of them...
13:57:37 kashyap Heh
17:14:01 mnaser sean-k-mooney: i know you play a fair bit with these things .. besides asap2, is there another way to get hw accelerated vxlan.. i'm wondering if ovs-dpdk can work for tenant networks (vxlan) too... but havent seen much reference in docs
18:05:25 sean-k-mooney[m] we do not have support for hardware offloads with dpdk yet
18:05:39 sean-k-mooney[m] in openstack
18:07:31 sean-k-mooney[m] mnaser: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.2/approved/support-napatech-linkvirtualization-smartnic.html is the spec you want
18:07:56 sean-k-mooney[m] that will add support for hardwar offloads with ovs-dpdk in general
18:08:16 sean-k-mooney[m] you do not need asap2 by the way
18:08:30 sean-k-mooney[m] upstream kernel ovs support hardware offloads
18:08:45 sean-k-mooney[m] but you do need the right nic driver
18:09:19 sean-k-mooney[m] you do not need the forked ovs however
18:10:13 sean-k-mooney[m] mnaser: https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/topics/dpdk/phy/#representors is the upstream ovs doc for dpdk hardware offloads
18:15:31 sean-k-mooney[m] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/howto/dpdk.rst#flow-hardware-offload-experimental
18:35:01 mnaser sean-k-mooney[m]: so from an openstack pov, only offload we can do right now is asap2
18:35:40 sean-k-mooney[m] technially we only supprot kernel ovs hardware offload with upstream ovs
18:36:49 sean-k-mooney[m] the in tree melanox kernel nic driver should be sufficient
18:37:09 sean-k-mooney[m] but asap is what nvidia/mellonx brand it as
18:37:20 mnaser do you know if intel has similar support?
18:37:46 sean-k-mooney[m] not currently. they had poc but no product in the market
18:40:00 mnaser sean-k-mooney[m]: i see, cause i ran into this https://networkbuilders.intel.com/docs/networkbuilders/intel-ethernet-controller-700-series-open-vswitch-hardware-acceleration-application-note.pdf
18:40:56 sean-k-mooney[m] yep with fortvial and ovs-dpdk
18:41:25 mnaser sean-k-mooney[m]: so only possible if that spec gets implemented?
18:42:06 sean-k-mooney[m] yep. dpdk hardware offloads in ovs is experimental
18:42:49 sean-k-mooney[m] but ovs-dpdk has had support for using rte_flow with some offload using fortviale/700 series and later
18:43:10 sean-k-mooney[m] for years
18:43:28 sean-k-mooney[m] but an end to end solution has not really matiarlised
18:43:35 mnaser i see, so really dont have a lot of choices in this section unfortunatel
18:43:36 mnaser y
18:43:41 sean-k-mooney[m] the spec i linked should enable that
18:44:03 mnaser bummer, ive been trying to get these palo alto vm series
18:44:07 mnaser and they refuse to work with mlx nics
18:44:21 mnaser and dpdk cant be offloaded for tenant networks
18:45:21 sean-k-mooney[m] for what its worth i joined redhat form intel 5 years ago and i was working on intel hardware offload support before i left
18:45:41 sean-k-mooney[m] and in that time they have not really made any forward progress until recently
18:46:02 sean-k-mooney[m] napatech are partly doing the enabling in that spec on behalf of intel
18:46:49 sean-k-mooney[m] which i found kind of odd when there PM said that at the PTG as intel used to have peole that worked on openstack
18:51:52 mnaser yeah its been frustrating since PA only supports a few sriov vf's which doesnt include mlx ones
#openstack-nova - 2023-07-20
07:30:44 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284
08:09:29 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881457
08:09:30 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Delete dangling bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/882284
08:51:30 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize calls to Neutron and Cinder in post_live_migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883678
08:51:30 opendevreview Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: Call Neutron immediately upon _post_live_migration() start https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883682
10:47:29 sean-k-mooney dansmith: when you are around could you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/888648 to unblock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886779
10:55:30 stephenfin bauzas: There's a student from Oregon State University that has been working on OSC for the last few months and she's now eager to try her hand at one of the services themselves. How reasonable would it be to suggest a low-hanging nova API-related RFE for her to work on?
10:57:13 stephenfin I'm happy to keep covering the mentoring side of things but the ask would be for (a) suggestions of something relatively useful to do and (b) reviews if she works on it. She's around until June 2024 so it'll be relatively long-term (i.e. the C release cycle and a chunk of D)
10:58:56 stephenfin Easier things I can think of are changing the 'addresses' field in 'GET /servers/{serverID}' so we use an ID for the top-level key, to prevent munging of similarly named networks, and updating a few of the HTTP response codes, but I'm sure there's much more useful stuff to do
11:34:36 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy tables from main DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889087
11:34:36 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy placement tables from API DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889086
11:34:37 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Remove legacy columns from main DB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/889088
11:55:13 bauzas stephenfin: sorry was at lunch
11:56:03 bauzas stephenfin: we don't have a lot of low-hanging-fruits RFEs for the moment, but sure we can help

Earlier   Later