| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-23 | |||
| 12:27:00 | frickler | not sure if nova tests on debian at all, though | |
| 12:28:26 | sean-k-mooney | we dont currently but if we are advertisign the next version we are slecting for C and later | |
| 12:28:34 | sean-k-mooney | then we should look at debian 12 i think | |
| 12:28:49 | kashyap | frickler: So that's the Debian-11, right? For libvirt, at least - https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye/libvirt | |
| 12:29:07 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Yeah, for next version definitely Bookworm (12) | |
| 12:29:35 | frickler | there's also https://packages.debian.org/source/bullseye-backports/libvirt which I think could be acceptable | |
| 12:30:16 | frickler | iiuc zigo curates those | |
| 12:30:29 | sean-k-mooney | we basiclaly just need to do a servay of what is in current LTS/Stable to determin our next min libvirt | |
| 12:30:42 | kashyap | Yep | |
| 12:31:01 | kashyap | I'll send out an email something like this from the past - https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/010907.html | |
| 12:31:06 | sean-k-mooney | the ones that kashyap will be updating to for this cycle are already known | |
| 12:31:14 | sean-k-mooney | and quite old | |
| 12:32:41 | kashyap | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L221,#L222 | |
| 12:33:12 | sean-k-mooney | so we will be movign to libvirt 7.0.0 and qemu 5.2.0 we likely should ue libvirt 8.0.0 as the new value for NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION and | |
| 12:33:31 | kashyap | Yes, Jammy has: | |
| 12:33:33 | kashyap | libvirt-daemon: 8.0.0-1ubuntu7.5 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy-updates/libvirt-daemon | |
| 12:33:37 | kashyap | And: | |
| 12:33:40 | kashyap | qemu-system-x86: 6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.11 -- https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/qemu-system-x86 | |
| 12:33:55 | kashyap | - CentOS Stream 9: libvirt-daemon-kvm-9.3.0-2.el9.x86_64.rpm - qemu-kvm-8.0.0-4.el9.x86_64.rpm | |
| 12:34:15 | sean-k-mooney | and proably qemu 6.2 | |
| 12:35:18 | sean-k-mooney | debainb and stream 9 both have 7.x but ubuntu 22.04 has 6.2 | |
| 12:36:59 | frickler | yes, that'll likely need to wait another cycle until 24.04 LTS is out | |
| 12:37:12 | sean-k-mooney | yep but i think thats fine | |
| 12:37:30 | kashyap | Then lowest common denominator is Jammy (22.04) here | |
| 12:37:38 | kashyap | So whatever is in Jammy is what we go w/ for the NEXT_MIN | |
| 12:38:20 | sean-k-mooney | we can annouch our next min version to to 22.04 deps for C/2024.1 and then in D revaluate what they should be after ubuntu 24.04 is out | |
| 12:38:33 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: yep | |
| 12:39:10 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Can you rephrase this, it's not clear to me: "... deps for C/2024.1" | |
| 12:39:47 | sean-k-mooney | well the earlist we could bump to the new min deps you will be propsoing is 2024.1 or the C release | |
| 12:40:26 | sean-k-mooney | we dont have to do that but its also the skip level update release that will be used to move between 22.04 and 24.04 | |
| 12:40:34 | kashyap | Oh, sure; we're only declaring the next_min; the bump only happens once C is out | |
| 12:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | so having our min version match what 22.04 ships is not a bad thing | |
| 12:41:02 | kashyap | Okay; I'll sumamrize in the email to list, then you/others can respond if you want anything to add | |
| 12:41:05 | kashyap | Just so it's recorded | |
| 12:41:46 | sean-k-mooney | ack it will also be recoded in https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html when your done too but never hurts to send it to the list | |
| 12:43:12 | kashyap | Yep :) | |
| 14:06:38 | opendevreview | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: Pick next min libvirt / QEMU versions for "C" (2024) release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886825 | |
| 14:09:05 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: kashyap: sorry I was a bit afk, but tbc, I don't want that we should bump the minimum version for Bobcat, like sean said, rather on 2024.1 C | |
| 14:09:13 | zigo | frickler: sean-k-mooney: As far as I'm concerned, bullseye is dead, long live bookworm. The last version where I had support for Bullseye was Zed. | |
| 14:09:43 | zigo | So no problem if upgrading to libvirt 9... | |
| 14:10:43 | zigo | You guys can take whatever is in bookworm as what I can support minimum, and probably, also whatever's in bookworm-backports... | |
| 14:11:00 | zigo | If needed, I can even do the backports myself, if you ask early enough. | |
| 14:11:32 | kashyap | zigo: bauzas: Please comment here: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-June/034231.html | |
| 14:11:39 | kashyap | (Cc: sean-k-mooney, frickler) | |
| 14:11:45 | zigo | Experimental has 9.4.0, so probably it will be uploaded to Unstable soon, then migrate to Trixie, and then I can backport to Bookworm. | |
| 14:26:08 | kashyap | Thanks! | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-26 | |||
| 08:56:12 | bauzas | folks, I have a couple of review requests, is there anyone fancy to do it ? | |
| 08:57:19 | bauzas | first one is an easy peasy, it just adds some functional verification for cross_az_attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878948 | |
| 08:57:26 | bauzas | I need a second core ^ | |
| 08:58:25 | bauzas | second one is important for fixing a cpu power management issue, should be easy to review too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885352 | |
| 08:58:33 | bauzas | needs a second core as well ^ | |
| 08:59:05 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate ironic.peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883346 | |
| 08:59:39 | bauzas | third one is a specless bp change, simple for just adding a new cod-migrate policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562 | |
| 08:59:57 | bauzas | so, who can help me ? :) | |
| 09:06:15 | gibi | bauzas: o/ remind me, did we discussed that specless on the meeting? | |
| 09:06:39 | bauzas | gibi: it was approved IIRC, but lemme double-check | |
| 09:06:56 | bauzas | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cold-migrate-to-host-policy correct it was | |
| 09:07:14 | gibi | bauzas: thanks | |
| 09:07:31 | bauzas | https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-04-25-16.00.log.html#l-203 | |
| 09:07:56 | bauzas | gibi: thanks for doing this round of reviews, I know you're busy | |
| 09:08:21 | gibi | ohh sh*t now I have to do these reviews :D | |
| 09:14:14 | bauzas | gibi: nah, don't feel pressured | |
| 09:14:51 | bauzas | I'm thinking of creating an etherpad of code reviews either way :) | |
| 09:15:50 | gibi | done :D | |
| 09:15:57 | gibi | I mean with the reviews | |
| 09:23:24 | sean-k-mooney | i can review some of them while i wait for my dev env to deploy | |
| 09:26:03 | sean-k-mooney | there is one minor english issue in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562/2/api-ref/source/servers-admin-action.inc and a slight nit later | |
| 09:26:07 | sean-k-mooney | but im +2 on it | |
| 09:26:19 | sean-k-mooney | i held +w in case you want to quickly fix it? | |
| 09:30:52 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sorry was working on updating some change | |
| 09:31:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sure, I can quickly respin for that english point | |
| 09:31:28 | bauzas | should be better than a FUP | |
| 09:31:28 | sean-k-mooney | ack ill fast approve once its ready | |
| 09:34:23 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a new policy for cold-migrate with host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881562 | |
| 09:34:31 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: gibi: ^ | |
| 10:02:11 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated AZ filter. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886779 | |
| 10:11:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: speaking of easy reviews can you hit this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886596 to drop fedora form teh experimental pipeline | |
| 10:11:34 | sean-k-mooney | the infra team are woking on droping the fedora images from ci | |
| 11:00:15 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Limit nodes by ironic shard key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886980 | |
| 11:09:52 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate ironic.peer_list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883346 | |
| 11:10:12 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Limit nodes by ironic shard key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886980 | |
| 11:44:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Verify a move operation for cross_az_attach=False https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878948 | |
| 12:15:49 | opendevreview | Danylo Vodopianov proposed openstack/nova master: Packed virtqueue support was added. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/876075 | |
| 15:07:42 | dansmith | bauzas: I would sure love to have some review on my compute object id set | |
| 15:08:05 | dansmith | I wrote it a long time ago, but I barely remember what's in it anymore, so addressing feedback becomes more and more expensive as time goes on... :/ | |
| 15:08:08 | bauzas | dansmith: aha, right, I need to look at your series | |
| 15:29:18 | bauzas | reminder : tomorrow will be our spec review day | |
| 15:29:38 | bauzas | (adding this reminder also for me :) ) | |
| 16:00:09 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Limit nodes by ironic shard key https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886980 | |
| 16:42:39 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add nova-manage ironic-compute-node-move https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/886989 | |
| 17:56:50 | gmann | bauzas: dansmith: can either of you approve this, adding py310 func job on gate pipeline too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881339 | |
| 17:58:56 | dansmith | approved, but I guess I'm not sure it's really important to run on so many python versions | |
| 17:59:09 | dansmith | it's not likely that python version problems will crop up between check and gate :) | |
| 18:00:29 | gmann | nova-tox-functional-py39 can be removed as py38 and py310 can cover it | |
| 18:01:07 | dansmith | definitely seems prudent to do that yeah | |
| 23:00:10 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral storage encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/887011 | |
| 23:14:31 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose spec for ephemeral encryption for libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/887012 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-27 | |||
| 01:52:06 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Propose tooling and docs for unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/887014 | |
| 04:33:24 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose "Policy service role spec" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/881880 | |
| 05:39:03 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/os-vif stable/wallaby: set default qos policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/886778 | |