| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-06-06 | |||
| 16:20:57 | gibi | but other can chime in there too :) | |
| 16:20:58 | bauzas | as a reminder, if folks don't have time to review specs today, that's fine (c) | |
| 16:21:09 | bauzas | but please try to look at them this week | |
| 16:21:10 | gibi | there is alway tomorrow :) | |
| 16:21:22 | bauzas | at least before the Summit in case people discuss there | |
| 16:21:31 | bauzas | anyway, good related point, | |
| 16:21:40 | bauzas | #topic pPTG Planning | |
| 16:21:45 | bauzas | #info please add your topics and names to the etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vancouver-june2023-nova | |
| 16:21:57 | bauzas | crickets in there ^ | |
| 16:22:12 | bauzas | so I'll write an -discuss ML thread for this | |
| 16:22:20 | gibi | nah, I added one thing now :D | |
| 16:22:23 | bauzas | in case ops or devs want to discuss with us | |
| 16:22:30 | bauzas | hehe | |
| 16:23:23 | bauzas | + I'll tell ops during our forum meet&greet about our PTG | |
| 16:23:36 | bauzas | #info The table #24 is booked for the whole two days. See the Nova community there ! | |
| 16:23:36 | bauzas | #info The table #24 is booked for the whole two days. See the Nova community there ! | |
| 16:23:40 | bauzas | that's it | |
| 16:23:42 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:23:48 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:23:56 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:24:01 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:24:06 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:24:12 | bauzas | elodilles is maybe afk | |
| 16:24:18 | bauzas | so lemme add his points | |
| 16:24:31 | bauzas | #info stable gates should be OK (from stable/2023.1 to stable/train) | |
| 16:24:37 | bauzas | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:24:42 | bauzas | huzzah for this | |
| 16:24:51 | bauzas | and my point | |
| 16:24:57 | bauzas | #info train-eol patch proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/885365 | |
| 16:25:10 | bauzas | I'd appreciate if nova-cores could comment it ^ | |
| 16:25:19 | dansmith | I will | |
| 16:25:31 | dansmith | I noticed the cinder people are taking a more aggressive approach | |
| 16:25:40 | bauzas | gibi: okay, then -1 my patch and I'll modify it to await for your backport merge | |
| 16:25:47 | bauzas | dansmith: yup, saw it too | |
| 16:25:53 | gibi | bauzas: I think I'm OK to drop that backport | |
| 16:26:05 | gibi | I did that to see if the patch works | |
| 16:26:12 | bauzas | gibi: as you want, just tell me your insights in the train-eol patch | |
| 16:26:18 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:26:44 | bauzas | dansmith: fwiw I'm afraid of EOLing the whole EM branches | |
| 16:27:09 | dansmith | shrug.. my argument for train applies to all the EM ones too | |
| 16:27:16 | dansmith | maybe we wait and see how it goes for cinder ;) | |
| 16:27:38 | bauzas | but since we haven't backported the os-brick CVE fix in Ussuri and Victoria, I could understand | |
| 16:28:01 | bauzas | but yeah, let's see what it's happening for cinder :D | |
| 16:28:26 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:28:35 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:28:45 | bauzas | none in the agenda | |
| 16:28:54 | bauzas | anything that someone wants to tell ? | |
| 16:30:01 | gibi | one thing | |
| 16:30:05 | bauzas | shoto | |
| 16:30:11 | bauzas | shoot even | |
| 16:30:34 | gibi | there was a request for opinion about openstack on k8s | |
| 16:30:40 | gibi | let me find the link | |
| 16:30:55 | sean-k-mooney | its a thing that people do | |
| 16:31:36 | bauzas | okidoki, let's wait | |
| 16:32:15 | gibi | 13:01 < mdbooth> I'll be running a forum session on Kubernetes on OpenStack in Vancouver next week. It's for users and developers of all related projects to talk to each other. Etherpad is here if there's anything you'd like to discuss: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openinfra-2023-kubernetes-on-openstack | |
| 16:32:20 | gibi | 13:01 < mdbooth> I'll be running a forum session on Kubernetes on OpenStack in Vancouver next week. It's for users and developers of all related projects to talk to each other. Etherpad is here if there's anything you'd like to discuss: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openinfra-2023-kubernetes-on-openstack | |
| 16:32:30 | gibi | sorry for the duplicate | |
| 16:32:47 | sean-k-mooney | im wondering why mdboot is runnign that session but ok | |
| 16:32:51 | dansmith | that's k8s on openstack not what you said right? | |
| 16:32:57 | gibi | sorry I mixed up | |
| 16:32:59 | sean-k-mooney | that k8s on openstack | |
| 16:33:01 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 16:33:05 | bauzas | ok, so lemme add the link | |
| 16:33:17 | sean-k-mooney | that makes more sense why mdbooth is involved | |
| 16:33:26 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openinfra-2023-kubernetes-on-openstack OpenInfra Forum session for discussing about k8s on openstack | |
| 16:33:37 | bauzas | gibi: the other way btw. :) | |
| 16:33:41 | gibi | there is some nova related question in the etherpad | |
| 16:34:24 | gibi | about getting notified if anything changed with servers | |
| 16:34:30 | gibi | I offered the nova notification inteface | |
| 16:34:35 | bauzas | yeah and it's a public API :) | |
| 16:34:38 | gibi | but apperantly they want something public | |
| 16:34:58 | gibi | the API is documented but the message bus access then to be non public | |
| 16:34:58 | sean-k-mooney | the notifcation are the only interface we have currently | |
| 16:35:03 | bauzas | since someone worked on notifications objects like 6 years ago (guess who :p ) | |
| 16:35:14 | gibi | bauzas: hah :D | |
| 16:35:24 | bauzas | gibi: are you sure that the message bus can't be public ? | |
| 16:35:33 | dansmith | it shouldn't be | |
| 16:35:39 | gibi | yeah | |
| 16:35:43 | dansmith | we have instance events.. that's what they want I think | |
| 16:35:48 | sean-k-mooney | the notification bus is semi privladged | |
| 16:35:50 | gibi | and our notifications tend to contain infra information | |
| 16:35:52 | dansmith | I think they just need an async way to get those | |
| 16:35:58 | sean-k-mooney | the notifications can have private infor in them | |
| 16:36:02 | sean-k-mooney | depening on what you configure | |
| 16:36:04 | sean-k-mooney | like the bdms | |
| 16:36:30 | gibi | yeah, bottom line the notification API is designed for consumed by admins or other openstack service not endusers | |
| 16:36:43 | dansmith | right, it would leak bad things between tenants for sure | |
| 16:36:43 | bauzas | ah they want it to be consumable by endusers ? | |
| 16:36:47 | dansmith | not just infra things | |
| 16:36:52 | gibi | yeah | |
| 16:36:58 | bauzas | urth | |
| 16:37:01 | sean-k-mooney | you could have a multi tentant service that converts the notificaton in to a webhook callback or similar | |
| 16:37:01 | bauzas | urgh | |
| 16:37:09 | dansmith | instance events/actions is the right thing I think, it's just only polling currently | |
| 16:37:13 | sean-k-mooney | but that still not greate | |
| 16:37:28 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: ya the event stream would work but im not sure that | |
| 16:37:37 | gibi | yeah, a websocket around instance actions wouldbe nice | |
| 16:37:41 | sean-k-mooney | even if it was event based they woud lwant ot liste per instance | |
| 16:37:53 | sean-k-mooney | more liek open a websocket and get all instance events for a project? | |
| 16:38:09 | dansmith | they probably want to be able to register a handler with a scope (one instance, all my instances) that lives for a period of time that we call when there's a new event | |