| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-04-18 | |||
| 16:13:00 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:13:05 | elodilles | #info final Xena release (24.2.1) is out - ready to transition stable/xena to EM | |
| 16:13:13 | bauzas | huzzah | |
| 16:13:22 | elodilles | hopefully we haven't merged anything harmful :) | |
| 16:13:26 | bauzas | and I +1d the EM patch | |
| 16:13:43 | bauzas | so we're ready | |
| 16:13:45 | elodilles | yepp, I will +2+W tomorrow morning | |
| 16:13:58 | bauzas | one week in advance nah ? | |
| 16:14:07 | bauzas | if so, \o/ | |
| 16:14:10 | elodilles | almost 1 week, yes :] | |
| 16:14:20 | elodilles | so we are good i think :) | |
| 16:14:32 | bauzas | xena was a nice warrior but we should do yoga now | |
| 16:14:43 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:14:48 | elodilles | now the general things: | |
| 16:14:55 | elodilles | #info stable gates are not blocked, but sometimes patches need many rechecks | |
| 16:14:59 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:15:22 | elodilles | that's all from me | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | cool and thanks | |
| 16:17:10 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:17:16 | bauzas | auniyal: I guess you wanted to add the two other items ? | |
| 16:17:20 | auniyal | #help Please review these backport patches for zed and yoga release | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | as a weekly reminder | |
| 16:17:28 | auniyal | will be releasing this week | |
| 16:17:37 | auniyal | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/release-liaison-PatchesToReview | |
| 16:17:43 | bauzas | ack gtk, so I'll try to do homework then | |
| 16:17:45 | auniyal | thats all bauzas, thanks | |
| 16:17:55 | bauzas | auniyal: thanks | |
| 16:18:01 | elodilles | thanks in advance auniyal :) | |
| 16:18:01 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:18:07 | bauzas | (this time, I'm refreshing) | |
| 16:18:22 | bauzas | aaaand nothing, even after Ctrl-R | |
| 16:18:35 | bauzas | so, anything to say before we end this meeting ? | |
| 16:18:55 | bauzas | I thought we wanted to discuss about some volume detach issues | |
| 16:19:25 | bauzas | but not sure if the reporter is around, can't see jsanemet here | |
| 16:19:37 | auniyal | bauzas, I have a feature spec on dangling volume its on review, is it same topic ? | |
| 16:20:06 | auniyal | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/878757 | |
| 16:20:18 | bauzas | auniyal: nope, jorge wanted to discuss about the volume detach issues we were having in CI | |
| 16:20:34 | auniyal | ack | |
| 16:20:37 | bauzas | but given he's not around, we'll defer it to next week (if so) | |
| 16:20:56 | bauzas | auniyal: fwiw, your spec is part of my review backlog | |
| 16:21:27 | auniyal | thanks bauzas | |
| 16:21:32 | bauzas | okay, then, let's close early | |
| 16:22:03 | bauzas | folks, have a nice day, be it pretty done or early for you :) | |
| 16:22:18 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:22:21 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-04-18-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:22:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-04-18-16.00.txt | |
| 16:22:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-04-18-16.00.html | |
| 16:22:21 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Apr 18 16:22:21 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:22:21 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:22:44 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove silent failure to find a node on rebuild https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880632 | |
| 16:22:45 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Stop ignoring missing compute nodes in claims https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880633 | |
| 16:23:22 | bauzas | dansmith: looking at it then | |
| 16:24:09 | bauzas | heh, first time I'm seeing such gerrit comment : "Code-Review-1 (copy condition: "changekind:TRIVIAL_REBASE OR is:MIN")" | |
| 16:27:54 | dansmith | bauzas: I'm really not trying to nitpick, I just want to make sure we're sending what we should be | |
| 16:28:09 | bauzas | that was me who nitpicked | |
| 16:28:22 | bauzas | anyway; +2d | |
| 16:28:30 | dansmith | bauzas: all the exit paths from that rebuild send a dedicated notification about the "phase" of the rebuild and I just didn't want to add a path that doesn't | |
| 16:28:53 | bauzas | I see your point | |
| 16:32:48 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193 | |
| 16:32:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194 | |
| 16:32:49 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401 | |
| 16:32:50 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830 | |
| 16:32:50 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090 | |
| 16:32:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500 | |
| 16:32:51 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499 | |
| 16:32:52 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028 | |
| 16:32:52 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501 | |
| 16:32:54 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852085 | |
| 16:32:54 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029 | |
| 16:32:56 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087 | |
| 16:32:56 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086 | |
| 16:32:58 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824 | |
| 16:32:58 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823 | |
| 16:33:00 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283 | |
| 16:33:00 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282 | |
| 16:33:02 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285 | |
| 16:33:02 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284 | |
| 16:33:04 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287 | |
| 16:33:04 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286 | |
| 16:33:06 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642 | |
| 16:33:06 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860288 | |
| 16:33:08 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075 | |
| 16:38:44 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we missed talking about the release note for hyperv and vmawre experimental/deprecated status | |
| 16:38:54 | sean-k-mooney | or more speicifclly backporting that to antelope | |
| 16:39:05 | bauzas | shit | |
| 16:39:18 | bauzas | my brain derailed | |
| 16:39:49 | sean-k-mooney | so i would obviosly like to do both (merge on master and backport) | |
| 16:40:00 | sean-k-mooney | so that the warning goes out early | |
| 16:40:15 | sean-k-mooney | and then wait and see what happens with os-win before doing anythin else | |
| 16:41:15 | sean-k-mooney | if the TC retrie os-win in bobcat then we can look at remvoing the supprot in 2024.1 | |
| 16:42:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: my only concern is that the relnotes for 27.0.0 won't see it | |
| 16:42:10 | sean-k-mooney | as long as its not breaking any ci jobs and we have sent the warning i dont think thre is any pressure on us to do anything else | |
| 16:42:13 | bauzas | show* | |
| 16:42:27 | bauzas | so operators may miss it | |
| 16:42:34 | sean-k-mooney | we can proably fix that | |
| 16:43:09 | bauzas | well, they would need to upgrade to latest 2023.1 release before they would see the log, hence my point | |
| 16:43:10 | sean-k-mooney | but they shoudl not just be looking at 27.0.0 before going to 29.0.0 | |
| 16:44:02 | sean-k-mooney | yep but i dont think we will ahve peopel upgradign for 27.0.0 directly to 29.0.0 without any updates to 27.x.y | |
| 16:44:09 | dansmith | I think backporting a reno to antelope is a good idea to increase our warning interval, but I do not think that buys us more time in terms of how soon we can do something | |
| 16:44:14 | sean-k-mooney | its a concern but i think its a minor one | |