| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-04-04 | |||
| 16:16:06 | bauzas | that's it. | |
| 16:16:46 | bauzas | we could review some series on the week before FF, but honestly, I think it's late (and also I'll just be back from PTO) | |
| 16:17:20 | bauzas | so I'd prefer to tell the blueprints owners to provide their series one month before (as we also discussed during the PTG) | |
| 16:17:56 | bauzas | anyway, as a reminder, please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/877094 before tomorrow 1600UTC | |
| 16:18:04 | bauzas | again, that's it on this topic for me | |
| 16:19:20 | bauzas | moving on, I guess | |
| 16:19:38 | bauzas | oh, last point | |
| 16:19:41 | bauzas | #info Bobcat-1 is in 5 weeks. | |
| 16:19:47 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update min support for Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/875621 | |
| 16:19:52 | bauzas | woooohoooooooooooooooooooooooo | |
| 16:19:54 | bauzas | ^ | |
| 16:20:08 | bauzas | so, next topic | |
| 16:20:15 | bauzas | #topic vPTG feedback | |
| 16:20:22 | bauzas | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-April/033124.html | |
| 16:20:39 | bauzas | I provided an email summary ^ | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | btw. heh, sorry about s/NFV/NFS :p | |
| 16:21:16 | bauzas | -ETOOMANYNETWORKINGDISCUSSIONS | |
| 16:21:26 | elodilles | :) | |
| 16:21:32 | bauzas | anyway, it was more a FYI | |
| 16:21:41 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:50 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:21:55 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:22:04 | bauzas | next topic | |
| 16:22:10 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:22:24 | bauzas | elodilles: before I'm asking you, let me first add something :) | |
| 16:22:31 | elodilles | sure :) | |
| 16:22:33 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/878860 Xena stable branche EM proposal | |
| 16:22:39 | bauzas | so, | |
| 16:22:49 | bauzas | I said last week we should discuss the Xena EM approval this week | |
| 16:23:21 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/xena+is:open | |
| 16:23:31 | bauzas | those are the open changes we have | |
| 16:23:33 | bauzas | so, question | |
| 16:23:35 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix trivial doc issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/878779 | |
| 16:24:27 | bauzas | does anyone want to have their series be merged in xena before we EM ? | |
| 16:24:42 | bauzas | as a reminder, we can continue to merge patches in that branch | |
| 16:25:10 | bauzas | this is just we won't have an upstream .z or .y release after EM tag | |
| 16:25:41 | auniyal | this is a clean backport for xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874066 | |
| 16:25:41 | bauzas | anyone ? | |
| 16:26:15 | elodilles | just an addition to what bauzas said: anyone see any patch that "would be good to get merged & released as final"? | |
| 16:26:27 | elodilles | in xena | |
| 16:26:44 | bauzas | elodilles: maybe we could wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866156 to be merged | |
| 16:26:55 | bauzas | since it's a bit of a regression | |
| 16:27:12 | bauzas | and yoga was merged | |
| 16:27:15 | elodilles | btw, we have a tracking pad if needed: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-xena-em | |
| 16:27:26 | elodilles | so we can add these patches there ^^^ | |
| 16:27:39 | sean-k-mooney | ill review that backport now | |
| 16:27:56 | bauzas | auniyal: the problem is that the patch you proposed needs to have its yoga backport approved before | |
| 16:27:57 | elodilles | and (stable) cores could review them when they have time | |
| 16:28:20 | elodilles | i can also help with some reviews hopefully | |
| 16:28:31 | bauzas | elodilles: remind me when the deadline for Xena EM is ? | |
| 16:28:33 | auniyal | yeah my bad its not merged in yoga | |
| 16:28:45 | elodilles | well, the transition date is April 20th | |
| 16:29:02 | elodilles | should be good to release earlier though | |
| 16:29:05 | bauzas | ok, then we'll track the progress every week | |
| 16:29:16 | bauzas | and every week, I'll ask the question | |
| 16:29:26 | elodilles | maybe we can see if next week we can cut a release | |
| 16:29:35 | bauzas | in the meantime, people can merge whatever they want | |
| 16:29:40 | bauzas | elodilles: yup | |
| 16:29:51 | bauzas | don't disagree | |
| 16:30:14 | elodilles | note also, that we had a xena release around end of january (24.2.0) | |
| 16:30:29 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-xena-em Tracking etherpad for Xena | |
| 16:30:31 | elodilles | so really the open patches is mostly the ones that we need to consider | |
| 16:31:05 | bauzas | #info please tell the nova community which patches you want to have to be released before next week by pinging bauzas on IRC | |
| 16:31:05 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i have approved the mdev patch | |
| 16:31:11 | sean-k-mooney | just skimin gthe open ones now | |
| 16:31:18 | bauzas | cool thanks | |
| 16:31:29 | bauzas | anyway, elodilles, add your points now | |
| 16:31:30 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:31:50 | elodilles | well, there is nothing left just the usual | |
| 16:31:53 | elodilles | #info stable gates seem to be OK - though it's hard to merge patches due to intermittent failures | |
| 16:31:58 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:33:23 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:33:37 | bauzas | last topic then | |
| 16:33:42 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:33:45 | bauzas | the agenda is empty | |
| 16:33:53 | auniyal | so I was looking for backports in 2023.1, zed and yoga | |
| 16:33:55 | bauzas | anyone wants to discuss about something that we missed at the PTG ? | |
| 16:34:51 | gibi | bauzas: the lower constraint job discussion was punted last week | |
| 16:35:31 | bauzas | gibi: yup, I haven't asked you if you wanted to discuss about it today | |
| 16:35:32 | gibi | bauzas: I have not much to add to what was in the current or in the previous PTG etherpad just that I have the intention to add a limited lower constraint job | |
| 16:35:36 | bauzas | gibi: do you want now ? | |
| 16:35:40 | gibi | we can | |
| 16:35:44 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:36:05 | bauzas | (we also have other punted topics, but again, those were not prioritary for this week) | |
| 16:36:16 | bauzas | gibi: so, shoot | |
| 16:36:18 | gibi | yeah, this is not priority either | |
| 16:36:36 | bauzas | we discussed your topic briefly | |
| 16:36:50 | bauzas | concerns were coming from any potential transitive dependencies and the scope | |
| 16:37:01 | gibi | so I see that sean-k-mooney prefer not to have it | |
| 16:37:04 | bauzas | we said this was for unittests and functionaltests | |
| 16:37:11 | gibi | so the scope is intentionally limited | |
| 16:37:11 | dansmith | gmann also had comments I think | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:37:30 | sean-k-mooney | i do not wnat nova to be the only ones to have it if we do i would prefer it to be a perodic | |
| 16:37:35 | gibi | so run unit and functional test, only with the some of our direct depds pinned to lowest | |
| 16:37:43 | bauzas | and if I'm not wrong, this wouldn't be having transitive deps in the filez | |
| 16:37:45 | bauzas | file | |
| 16:37:54 | gibi | no transitives yes | |
| 16:38:02 | sean-k-mooney | im more or less ok with that but limitation | |
| 16:38:04 | bauzas | ok, then I wasn't wrong | |