Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-03-14
16:27:49 bauzas but you can start to write comments if you wish
16:28:41 bauzas moving on I guess
16:28:43 bauzas oh
16:28:51 bauzas I was about to forge
16:28:53 bauzas forget
16:29:16 bauzas I created all bobcat launchpad series for placement, novaclient and nova
16:29:51 bauzas now, we said to try to remove placement from storyboard
16:30:01 bauzas so I started to look and it looks difficult
16:30:26 bauzas #info as a reminder, please no longer use Storyboard for creating feature requests or bug reports https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/list?q=placement
16:30:45 bauzas but I'll try to see if I can do anything with https://opendev.org/ttygroup/boartty/
16:31:03 bauzas moving on
16:31:55 bauzas #topic vPTG Planning
16:32:06 bauzas usual reminder
16:32:08 bauzas #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-march-2023-tickets-483971570997 Register your free ticket
16:32:15 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-ptg PTG etherpad
16:32:20 bauzas now this is time
16:32:24 bauzas #info please add your topics before end of this week, so I could provide an agenda on Monday.
16:32:33 bauzas this is important
16:32:49 bauzas as I don't see a lot of topics yet in the ptg etherpad
16:33:00 bauzas (well, I actually wrote the majority of them)
16:33:26 bauzas also, if you want to discuss with other teams, please add your topics in the cross-project agenda
16:33:43 bauzas and then I'll ping the other PTLs in order to find some time
16:34:09 bauzas as a reminder, I asked for 4 days of 4 hours
16:34:47 bauzas but if the agenda remains quite empty as it is, I'll probably unbook the Friday rooms
16:35:26 sean-k-mooney if it was in person i would suggest using the firday slot for an unconfernce/hackaton
16:35:38 sean-k-mooney but i kind of hate the idea of doing that virutally
16:35:44 bauzas don't get me on that direction :)
16:35:52 sean-k-mooney so sure
16:36:04 sean-k-mooney we could keep the slot and decied durign the ptg
16:36:09 bauzas I mean, after 3 vPTGs, I'm quite done with them
16:36:12 sean-k-mooney i.e. if there is a topic we ant to come back too
16:36:23 bauzas surely
16:36:44 bauzas and I'm pretty sure people will add topics on the last time like every cycle..
16:36:56 bauzas (tbc, I'm also doing this game)
16:37:19 bauzas but even with that, I just feel Friday will be either off or hackathon
16:37:45 bauzas fwiw, my main priorities for the beginning of Bobcat is to review some series we accepted
16:37:56 bauzas like the manila one, which I'll probably help too
16:38:00 sean-k-mooney if we have noting to do on firday im fine with just say "thanks for coming folks" and doing a spec review day or something
16:38:13 bauzas sure
16:38:20 bauzas that's an idea
16:38:23 bauzas anyway
16:39:18 bauzas fwiw, the ptg main agenda is at the moment not large https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html
16:39:37 bauzas hopefully projects will book their rooms next week
16:40:25 bauzas (one thing I also think we miss with *virtual* PTGs is those kind of cross-project large discussions we had before)
16:40:48 bauzas but meh, moving on
16:41:09 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:41:14 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:41:18 bauzas #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:41:25 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:41:27 bauzas elodilles: your time
16:41:40 elodilles well, nothing special
16:41:49 elodilles i mean, not so many patches merge
16:41:59 elodilles but as far as i see:
16:42:09 elodilles #info stable gates seem to be OK - though it's hard to merge patches due to intermittent failures
16:42:16 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:42:31 elodilles that's all :X
16:43:15 dansmith a bunch of the things we've fixed haven't been backported to stable,
16:43:15 bauzas elodilles: dansmith: afaik, we haven't backported the mysqld memory reduction changes into stable branches ?
16:43:21 dansmith so I expect that will remain challenging
16:43:22 bauzas hah, jinx
16:43:40 bauzas we could work on that
16:43:48 dansmith I haven't been monitoring the mysql memory thing, but it seems like that _has_ helped yeah/
16:44:27 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Don't remove cached base images for failed resize ops https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/877410
16:44:31 dansmith there was a potential for negative impacts, but I've heard no complaints
16:45:19 elodilles dansmith: do you have a topic set for those patches? so that I could see whether some could be backported?
16:45:21 bauzas mmmh
16:45:56 dansmith elodilles: this in devstack plus the flag enabled: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/873646
16:46:26 elodilles dansmith: thanks, i'll have a look
16:46:29 bauzas example here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/874664
16:47:02 bauzas dansmith: but that means we would need to backport the devstack change too right?
16:47:12 dansmith that's why I said "this in devstack"
16:47:21 dansmith meaning you need it in the devstack branc you're running on
16:47:25 elodilles the nova patch is at least part of stable/2023.1 :)
16:47:27 dansmith which is kinda :/
16:48:13 sean-k-mooney so the memory patch proably shoudl be backported in devstack
16:48:14 bauzas yeah
16:48:23 sean-k-mooney becuase i think that might be useful on other stable branches
16:48:28 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/873646/3/lib/databases/mysql I understand dansmith's concerns
16:48:52 bauzas but it looks to me mysql doesn't bubble up the memory
16:48:54 dansmith I don't have specific concerns
16:49:08 dansmith if it's really that impactful, it's probably worth it,
16:49:18 bauzas do we have some mysql monitoring in devstack ?
16:49:19 dansmith it's just that it takes the devstack patch on each branch, plus job changes to enable
16:49:31 dansmith bauzas: we have my performance.json which has the info in it
16:49:56 dansmith gmann specifically didn't want to enable by default until bobcat (understandable)
16:50:02 dansmith so backporting to stable is kinda the opposite of that :)
16:50:14 bauzas yeah, I can understand
16:50:24 bauzas we shouldn't default this to all the jovs
16:50:26 bauzas obs
16:50:31 bauzas damn, jobs even
16:50:32 sean-k-mooney why not
16:50:38 dansmith the concerns are that it could slow down mysql and introduce other performance regressions that manifest as failures
16:50:44 dansmith it hasn't seemed to have done that in practice,
16:50:46 sean-k-mooney did we see a change in the job execution time
16:50:57 sean-k-mooney right
16:51:00 dansmith but the thought was to minimize the risk, in an already risky environment
16:51:05 bauzas sean-k-mooney: because of the fact we don't really monitor mysqld runs
16:51:12 bauzas in the logs
16:51:15 sean-k-mooney and reducing memory pressure might actully reduce swapping and speed up the job
16:51:15 dansmith bauzas: what does that mean?

Earlier   Later