| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-03-14 | |||
| 16:01:04 | bauzas | ok, let's start, people can join meanwhile | |
| 16:01:10 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:01:10 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:15 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:01:19 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 16 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:01:26 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:30 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | elodilles: I saw you did a bit of triage | |
| 16:02:07 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:02:08 | bauzas | I also looked at the new bugs todayt | |
| 16:02:16 | elodilles | thanks! | |
| 16:02:21 | bauzas | (to see whether we were regressing) | |
| 16:02:31 | bauzas | elodilles: nothing you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:02:43 | auniyal | bauzas, regarding this - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2011567 | |
| 16:02:52 | auniyal | The message right now is, "fill this in after the PTG", shall we update it to something else. | |
| 16:02:57 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:03:21 | bauzas | auniyal: as I said as a comment, we don't have cycle priorities | |
| 16:03:40 | bauzas | so, either we delete the Bobcat file, or meh | |
| 16:04:07 | sean-k-mooney | we have kept it for other release | |
| 16:04:17 | sean-k-mooney | its been blank for years at this point | |
| 16:04:18 | bauzas | yup, that's what I wrote | |
| 16:04:33 | bauzas | we can provide some upstream priorities if we want | |
| 16:04:40 | auniyal | okay, the msg seems like we missed to update after PTG | |
| 16:04:47 | bauzas | but, if we don't have anyone, should we delete the file ? | |
| 16:05:03 | sean-k-mooney | im ok either way | |
| 16:05:10 | bauzas | we could discuss this in the PTG if we want | |
| 16:05:14 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:05:18 | auniyal | ack | |
| 16:05:18 | bauzas | kk | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | let's do this then | |
| 16:05:42 | bauzas | auniyal: I also closed your other bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2011564 | |
| 16:05:56 | bauzas | auniyal: as I said, those links are just examples | |
| 16:05:57 | auniyal | yes, that I missed the example | |
| 16:06:03 | auniyal | my bad | |
| 16:06:09 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:06:15 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:06:20 | elodilles | about your question bauzas : there was a serialproxy TR. serialproxy example client seems very old and not really functional (bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2009956 ) | |
| 16:07:07 | elodilles | i guess low prio is OK for that | |
| 16:07:16 | elodilles | but correct me if i was wrong | |
| 16:07:32 | bauzas | elodilles: mmm, good question | |
| 16:07:46 | bauzas | 'low' is good for me | |
| 16:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | we expect the serial proxy to be used with netcat in generalright | |
| 16:08:48 | sean-k-mooney | oh actully we expeort it as a websocket | |
| 16:08:59 | sean-k-mooney | so you need a websocket client | |
| 16:09:04 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: netcat or any script like https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/testing/serial-console.html | |
| 16:09:07 | elodilles | yes, rather a websocket client | |
| 16:09:29 | sean-k-mooney | ya so i dont really consider the example in the docs to be maintained | |
| 16:09:38 | sean-k-mooney | if its not tested its broken by default | |
| 16:09:41 | sean-k-mooney | and we dont test that | |
| 16:09:56 | elodilles | ack | |
| 16:10:24 | bauzas | well, then should we deprecate this API ? | |
| 16:10:27 | sean-k-mooney | so we proably shoudl fix this and by either providing a new nova console script that we test or delete the current example and document using a diffent client | |
| 16:10:29 | bauzas | as a signal | |
| 16:10:32 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 16:10:36 | sean-k-mooney | it works fine in horizon | |
| 16:10:40 | bauzas | saying "sorry, we don't really test it" | |
| 16:10:42 | sean-k-mooney | or it did the last time i used it | |
| 16:10:56 | sean-k-mooney | we shoudl remove the example script | |
| 16:11:05 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: looks to me elodilles tested this with master and it wasn't longer working | |
| 16:11:18 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: did you test it with horizon | |
| 16:11:24 | sean-k-mooney | or that test script | |
| 16:11:55 | bauzas | I can try to test it with https://github.com/vi/websocat | |
| 16:11:56 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: well, I don't know whether my devstack was properly configured, but it didn't work | |
| 16:12:13 | elodilles | neither with any old clients | |
| 16:12:46 | elodilles | so i don't know whether this is a problem in serial proxy or the clients | |
| 16:12:51 | sean-k-mooney | ack we shoudl look into this more i dont currently have a devstack but i can try and find time to deploy one and see | |
| 16:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: if you can try configuring horizon to use it that would be the main way its used | |
| 16:13:16 | bauzas | me too | |
| 16:13:22 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ack | |
| 16:13:42 | bauzas | maybe let's put the importance to Medium, as this is an API | |
| 16:13:53 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/xena/admin/remote-console-access.html#serial | |
| 16:14:02 | sean-k-mooney | its not an api | |
| 16:14:18 | sean-k-mooney | but it is a fully supprot compenet | |
| 16:14:43 | bauzas | ah yes | |
| 16:14:45 | bauzas | you're right | |
| 16:14:56 | bauzas | a specific service | |
| 16:15:00 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:15:08 | bauzas | with another port | |
| 16:15:11 | sean-k-mooney | its just an alternivte to the novnc proxy | |
| 16:15:15 | elodilles | anyway, i've changed its prio to Medium | |
| 16:15:24 | bauzas | anyway, let's not try to find the solution here | |
| 16:15:30 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:15:45 | bauzas | elodilles: if you want, I can help you, ping me tomorrow | |
| 16:16:05 | bauzas | I don't think this is an Antelope regression btw. | |
| 16:16:36 | elodilles | bauzas: ack, thanks | |
| 16:16:44 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:16:54 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to auniyal | |
| 16:17:05 | bauzas | auniyal: you're ok with that ? | |
| 16:17:11 | auniyal | yes, | |
| 16:18:16 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:18:25 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:18:29 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:18:35 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures | |
| 16:18:55 | bauzas | I'll be honest, I haven't uploaded a lot of implementation changes this week | |
| 16:19:08 | bauzas | so I had not found any problem | |
| 16:19:22 | bauzas | so looks to me the gate is now better :) | |
| 16:19:33 | elodilles | :] | |
| 16:19:34 | dansmith | yeah, lots of small changes have improved things a lot | |
| 16:19:37 | bauzas | but we'll see after a few time, when we're back | |