Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-09
13:20:24 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support create with ephemeral encryption for qcow2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870932
13:20:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add hw_ephemeral_encryption_secret_uuid image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870935
13:20:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to convert_image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870934
13:20:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add encryption support to qemu-img rebase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870936
13:20:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add reset_encryption_fields() and save_all() to BlockDeviceMappingList https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870938
13:20:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Support snapshot with ephemeral encryption https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870937
13:20:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Introduce support for qcow2 with LUKS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/772273
13:20:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Update driver BDMs with ephemeral encryption image properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870939
13:35:36 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: let CPUs be power managed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821228
13:35:36 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: cpu: interfaces for managing state and governor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868236
13:35:38 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Enable cpus when an instance is spawning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868237
13:36:02 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: updated the series ^
13:36:07 bauzas will provide a fup for docs
14:36:08 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/yoga: Accept both 1 and Y as AMD SEV KVM kernel param value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/843819
15:30:24 opendevreview Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] Remove broken sdk job from wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873295
15:57:59 kashyap bauzas: Maybe it's just best to quickly rename the function here - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821228
15:58:36 kashyap bauzas: (Instead of a follow-up). Something like get_cpu_status() or get_cpu_power_status() -- as either of these names include both offline and online
16:23:00 bauzas what is the fuck this new CI issue ? TypeError: retry_bad_request() missing 1 required positional argument: 'fn'
16:23:01 bauzas https://6b96a36d22f450141095-9e4eb9f05513870f0e5456f29474f6b2.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/868236/5/check/nova-ceph-multistore/6011df8/testr_results.html
16:23:18 bauzas dansmith: ^ I'm pretty done with all those glance image issues
16:23:54 dansmith oh crap
16:24:02 dansmith that might be broken in the patch I just did
16:24:18 dansmith which might mean it did't actually get run in the tempest gate
16:24:20 dansmith eesh
16:24:56 dansmith crap yeah
16:25:06 dansmith so that's breaking anyone that runs that job 100% right now :(
16:25:40 bauzas then no worries, everyone can make mistakes
16:26:11 dansmith I was sure I checked,
16:26:20 dansmith but I have about a thousand open unit test report tabs right now :9
16:26:20 bauzas including me, having a long list of bugs I created
16:26:23 dansmith :(
16:27:11 dansmith need a DNM nova patch against the fix I guess
16:28:33 jungleboyj dansmith: You around?
16:29:31 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test tempest fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873302
16:29:37 dansmith bauzas: ^
16:29:48 dansmith jungleboyj: yes, are you here to hassle me about breaking the ceph job?
16:29:57 jungleboyj No, not at all.
16:30:06 jungleboyj Have a question for a customer.
16:30:29 jungleboyj Do you, or do you know of anyone who has experience setting up diskless compute nodes?
16:31:12 jungleboyj Is it even possible with Nova?
16:31:29 dansmith it's been done, but no direct experience. it's really not what nova was intended to do,
16:31:58 dansmith so I imagine you need some writable ramdisk area and obviously ceph-backed would be the way to go
16:32:07 dansmith but no, nothing really solid to recommend
16:32:29 dansmith (ceph because you can avoid downloading the image locally)
16:32:37 jungleboyj Right.
16:33:06 jungleboyj Is there data that needs to persist from boot to boot for Nova on the compute?
16:33:39 dansmith well, libvirt guest configs technically, but I imagine we'll recreate them if they're gone
16:34:11 dansmith jungleboyj: honestly you're going to have to try and iterate on the issues, I definitely can't point out all the icebergs without trying
16:34:49 kashyap a thousand open unit test report tabs
16:35:04 kashyap Oh god; please close some of 'em
16:35:08 dansmith jungleboyj: oh and in master now, we persist a compute node id file, which you'd need to restore on boot yourself somehow
16:35:10 jungleboyj Ok. It helps to know that, technically, it is possible. Trying to figure out how to help a customer that has a hardware config that limits what disk is available locally.
16:35:42 dansmith jungleboyj: but like i say, it's really fighting against nova's design, so it's not going to be fun :)
16:36:09 jungleboyj Understood. Thanks for the input. That was what I needed. :-)
16:36:33 kashyap That's a very handy phrase - "fighting against Nova's design"
16:51:34 bauzas I'm pretty harassed for the day folks (13 hours of work having started at 6am :) )
16:51:39 bauzas so, \o
16:51:49 bauzas dansmith: when I'm back, I'll look at your DNM
16:52:38 dansmith bauzas: it's just to actually run the tempest fix to validate, don't look. I tested locally it's all good, so hopefully we can get the tempest people to hit it quick
16:53:31 sean-k-mooney dansmith: +2 on the stable uuid doc, thanks for updating it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872977
16:53:40 dansmith sean-k-mooney: thanks
16:53:54 sean-k-mooney gibi: if perhaps you could be the second +2 its pretty short
16:54:22 sean-k-mooney or melwitt i would as bauzas but they are done for today
16:57:00 melwitt I will check it later and review if someone's not gotten to it yet
16:58:56 bauzas I still have a bit of juice
16:59:07 bauzas (but a terrible internet connection)
17:02:11 bauzas okay, +Wd
17:02:27 bauzas this ends my long day
17:04:21 bauzas dansmith: oh, actually before ending, any bug report you wanna want to have for the glance issue ?
17:04:53 dansmith bauzas: it's a bug in a bugfix, I think it's okay to just sweep it in
17:17:08 gibi sean-k-mooney: done
17:29:14 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Enable cpus when an instance is spawning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868237
17:30:33 bauzas This time done for the day ;-)
17:30:46 bauzas o/
17:36:37 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add docs for stable-compute-uuid behaviors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872977
18:06:52 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Delegate OVS plug to os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790447
18:12:04 gibi bauzas sean-k-mooney: I'm more or less OK with the power management series. I'm happy with the sys fs fixture now. I left some nits but nothing serious
19:27:46 sean-k-mooney johnthetubaguy: jayF am i right in saying no work has happend on https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.1/approved/ironic-shards.html and it will hopefully happne next cycle?
19:29:09 sean-k-mooney it loks like some of the code has landed https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:DBLayer_Shard_Key
19:29:50 sean-k-mooney so next cycle would just be the ironic driver changes in nova
19:34:15 gmann sean-k-mooney: placement one is merged. nova service role is pending. I will try to update the patch soon.
19:34:47 gmann it has been lot of other things and gate failures and I did not get chance to update that
19:34:59 sean-k-mooney ack
19:35:08 sean-k-mooney i was more wondering if we still planned to land it this cycle
19:35:25 sean-k-mooney i was hopeing we could but if it slips we can do it early next cycle
19:35:35 sean-k-mooney after RC1 is shiped in ~4 weeks
19:43:49 gmann yeah, let see if I can do it before FF
19:44:05 gmann elodilles: you need to remove it from check pipeline also along with template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873242
19:45:42 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] Remove broken sdk job from wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873295
19:46:12 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: [stable-only] Remove broken sdk job from wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873295
19:46:31 gmann elodilles: basically backporting this ti victoria ^^
19:46:38 gmann I have updated the depend-on
21:34:22 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/xena: nova-live-migration tests not needed for Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855469
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-10
03:49:36 opendevreview Yusuke Okada proposed openstack/nova master: Fix failed count for anti-affinity check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873216
04:10:02 opendevreview Yusuke Okada proposed openstack/nova master: Fix failed count for anti-affinity check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873216
08:28:28 opendevreview Jorge San Emeterio proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Look for cpu controller on cgroups v2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873127
08:50:03 gibi bauzas: I start to think that the functional test failure is somehow changing behavior just becuase we added logging.
08:50:24 bauzas really ?
08:50:50 bauzas gibi: btw. saw your highlight yesterday, thanks, didn't had yet time to look at my series but I can surely rush for the nits
08:50:55 gibi we rechecked it through multiple days

Earlier   Later