Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-02
17:25:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (objects) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/839401
17:25:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (db) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831193
17:25:10 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
17:25:10 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
17:25:11 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850499
17:25:11 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (api) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
17:25:12 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
17:25:12 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
17:25:13 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
17:25:14 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852085
17:25:14 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
17:25:16 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
17:25:16 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086
17:25:18 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824
17:25:18 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823
17:25:20 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283
17:25:20 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282
17:25:22 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285
17:25:22 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284
17:25:24 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287
17:25:24 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286
17:25:26 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642
17:25:26 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares (compute and API part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860288
20:41:14 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: cpu: interfaces for managing state and governor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868236
20:41:15 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: enable cpus when an instance is spawning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868237
20:41:15 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: let CPUs be power managed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/821228
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-03
02:08:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Check our nodes for hypervisor_hostname changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872220
09:47:39 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova master: Adds check if resized to swap zero https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857339
10:38:54 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional regression tests for bug 1857306 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/700456
10:52:34 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional regression tests for bug 1857306 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/700456
11:16:03 zigo My patch for rocky/stein/train probably has broke nova ... :(
11:17:00 zigo What's the current status of the Nova gate for these releases?
11:20:32 bauzas zigo: we're on hold with wallaby
11:20:54 bauzas and I think we won't have backports for Train
11:21:16 bauzas (and as a reminder, Stein and older branches are EOL'd in nova)
11:23:05 sean-k-mooney zigo: part of the problem with train and older is we cannot bump the minium requirements of oslo and the patach the provides the extra info was merged in ussuri
11:23:58 sean-k-mooney so the only way to backport this upstream in train and older would be to either vendor the oslo changes in nova or fallback to not fixign teh cve when oslo is not new enough
11:31:50 bauzas mmm, looks like a new gate problem \o/
11:31:52 bauzas https://opensearch.logs.openstack.org/_dashboards/app/discover?security_tenant=global#/?_g=(filters:!(),refreshInterval:(pause:!t,value:0),time:(from:now-7d,to:now))&_a=(columns:!(filename),filters:!(('$state':(store:appState),meta:(alias:!n,disabled:!f,index:'94869730-aea8-11ec-9e6a-83741af3fdcd',key:filename,negate:!f,params:(query:job-output.txt),type:phrase),query:(match_phrase:(filename:job-output.txt)))),index:'94869730-aea
11:31:54 bauzas 8-11ec-9e6a-83741af3fdcd',interval:auto,query:(language:kuery,query:test_replace_location),sort:!())
11:32:17 bauzas huzzah
11:37:17 bauzas https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2004641 is created
11:40:34 sean-k-mooney ya we have seen that a few times
11:40:44 sean-k-mooney not that new but definetly intermitant
11:41:21 sean-k-mooney i did see b'400 Bad Request\n\nThe Store URI was malformed.\n\n ' last year but only like once or twice
11:43:28 sean-k-mooney i have no idea why that happens sometimes
11:50:26 bauzas sean-k-mooney: unrelated, I tried this morning to see how to use the SysFixture I created to be used for two different computes
11:50:56 bauzas sean-k-mooney: the problem is not on how to use two fixture instances
11:51:22 sean-k-mooney its the mock of the sys path
11:51:52 sean-k-mooney you need to activate that when teh compute is started with a With statement
11:52:03 bauzas sean-k-mooney: but the question I have is how to make sure if that we call, say, migrate_instance() how to use the right fixture instance
11:52:19 bauzas sean-k-mooney: you think it would work so ?
11:52:33 bauzas I was thinking of this
11:52:47 sean-k-mooney we have done similar things in the past. dansmith is doing somethign similar in the stable uuid series
11:52:49 bauzas but I was afraid that when we call migrate_instance() it wouldn't work
11:53:00 sean-k-mooney well there is one way to find out
11:53:32 sean-k-mooney try it and see
11:53:35 bauzas I could use a context manager
11:53:44 bauzas yeah, I'll try
11:54:25 sean-k-mooney if its a proably the we can do it sleightly differnt by doing mock.patch.object on the speficic compute instnaces
11:54:36 sean-k-mooney *compute objects
11:54:47 sean-k-mooney and ensure each one will use the correct one
11:56:26 bauzas I'll test it
11:56:36 bauzas I'm pretty done with my series
11:56:41 bauzas I'm just adding more tests
11:57:01 sean-k-mooney as in "ready to give up" or its good for re review
11:57:06 sean-k-mooney im hoping the latter :)
11:57:52 sean-k-mooney main feedback at a glance is you have no docs and no release note so in addtion to tests please think about those
11:58:21 sean-k-mooney ping me when you would like a full review and/or manual testing of this
11:58:53 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yup, you can manually test if you want
11:59:23 bauzas sean-k-mooney: the WIP is +W because of the tests and indeed the documents
11:59:32 sean-k-mooney you probaly have not tried using mixed cpus (a vm with pinned and unpined cores) and im not sure if you have check what happens when you use vcpu_pin_set vs cpu_dedicated_set
11:59:43 bauzas s/+W/-W of course
11:59:58 bauzas sean-k-mooney: good point, I can try
12:00:46 sean-k-mooney ill test those manully but when you have some basic test functional test to cover the commen cases pushed in an non wip it would be nice to have functional tests for those
12:02:15 sean-k-mooney we should also test the other funky numa cases i really dont expect it to matter but asymetic numa nodes and multiple numa. all of those advanced cases however can be added later
12:02:22 sean-k-mooney i dont belive your code will care
12:03:27 sean-k-mooney instance.numa_topology.cpu_pinning should be ever PCPU the vm is pinned too regardless of numa
12:04:20 sean-k-mooney including the extra one not used by vm cores when you use hw:emulator_thread_policy=isolate
12:06:04 bauzas not sure I fully understand your point, sorry
12:06:40 sean-k-mooney if you tried to parse the pinned cpus form the xml there are a bunch of edgecases that you would have had to handel
12:06:51 sean-k-mooney like also lookign at the emulator thread
12:07:19 sean-k-mooney but since your using instance.numa_topology.cpu_pinning you can mostly ignore that complexity
12:07:56 bauzas yup changed it based on your point
12:08:32 sean-k-mooney so while it would still be nice to test some fo the more complex numa toplogies and edgecases the code should not genrally have to care about them
12:08:54 bauzas yup, that's why I want to have migration tests + some numa ones
12:09:17 sean-k-mooney bauzas: we are expictly only supporting this when you use cpu_dedicated_set right and not vcpu_pin_set
12:09:29 bauzas correct
12:09:48 bauzas well, checking my code
12:10:01 sean-k-mooney do we want to raise a config error like dansmith is doing in the stable uuid series
12:10:15 sean-k-mooney i.e. if you enable this but also have vcpu_pin_set defiend
12:10:39 sean-k-mooney or dont have cpu_dedicated_set defiend
12:10:58 bauzas good question, I need to think about it
12:11:14 sean-k-mooney there are extra edgecases that only come into play if you use vcpu_pin_set
12:11:18 sean-k-mooney which is why im asking
12:11:34 bauzas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/868237/6/nova/virt/libvirt/cpu/api.py
12:11:37 sean-k-mooney specificaly related to cpu_thread_policy=isolate on a host with hyperthreading
12:11:55 bauzas here, we only check get_decicated_set()
12:12:15 bauzas but we try to look the numa_topo blob from the instance
12:12:47 sean-k-mooney ok so that is not going to block it

Earlier   Later