| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-01-26 | |||
| 10:43:43 | bauzas | just add two checks there and I'm all good (for the conductor API) | |
| 10:43:56 | bauzas | (even if we apparently missed the other version checks...) | |
| 10:44:14 | sahid | working on it! thank for you help guys | |
| 10:45:32 | bauzas | sahid: for the compute RPC API, here is the existing test https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_rpcapi.py#L883-L916 | |
| 10:45:40 | bauzas | HTH | |
| 10:45:58 | bauzas | sahid: np, you're next in my review queue once you're all set | |
| 10:51:41 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney[m]: Sorry for my delay, just reading back the scroll of your analysis | |
| 10:54:39 | sean-k-mooney | tl;dr the io on those nodes that timeed out looks like its about 33% slower then normal. we are normally at 75% of the timeout so we dont have the headroom in that case | |
| 11:09:18 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: bauzas can we land gmann's placement service role patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/865618 | |
| 12:41:38 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Handle InstanceInvalidState exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861738 | |
| 13:15:20 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Thanks for the summary. It's nearly 2-ish hours, and still no sign of a vote - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870794 | |
| 13:16:39 | sean-k-mooney | its in gate | |
| 13:16:49 | sean-k-mooney | its been runing for 1hr 46mins | |
| 13:17:05 | sean-k-mooney | and tempest-integrated-compute passed already | |
| 13:17:15 | sean-k-mooney | you can watch it here if you like https://zuul.openstack.org/status#870794 | |
| 13:21:55 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Thank you :) | |
| 13:33:22 | ierdem | Hi, when I try to cold migrate VMs via cli by specifying destination host, it throws an exception after first migrate "No valid host was found" -no more details, just this message-, but destination host has enough resource. Does nova-scheduler cause this? If is, how can I force it to migrate more than one VMs to the same host? Thanks for all your assistance. (I have kolla-ansible stein-eol) | |
| 13:35:22 | bauzas | gmann: sean-k-mooney: dansmith: sorry, but maybe I'm confused but I thought system readers can scope resources of a deployment. If so, why are we returning HTTP403 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/865618 ? | |
| 13:36:38 | bauzas | (Alice in the spec, obviously) | |
| 13:37:41 | kashyap | (Third time lucky, the job indeed passed) | |
| 13:38:09 | kashyap | (We'll see if everythig else succeeds.) | |
| 13:38:39 | bauzas | oh wait | |
| 13:38:45 | bauzas | "Alice can list or retrieve specific endpoints. Alice cannot do any project specific operations since her authorization is limited to the deployment system." | |
| 13:38:54 | bauzas | including list, IIRC | |
| 13:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we are remvoing system reader form the placment polices | |
| 13:44:40 | sean-k-mooney | for most project we are geting rid fo scope entirly based on operator feedback in yoga? | |
| 13:46:10 | bauzas | but okay | |
| 13:46:18 | bauzas | I can understand we restrict the roles then | |
| 13:46:49 | bauzas | and which can be updated as long as we implement the features | |
| 13:48:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: At start-up rework compareCPU() usage with a workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870794 | |
| 13:50:05 | kashyap | Christ, it merged at last | |
| 13:53:05 | gibi | kashyap: it wasn't that long:) | |
| 13:53:40 | kashyap | gibi: You're right though. I tend to be a bit of a drama queen sometimes; please ignore me :) | |
| 13:54:14 | kashyap | gibi: Thank you both for the help! Now hope the API replacement patch goes through soon | |
| 13:54:21 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: any docs you could point me out on the new direction for system roles ? | |
| 13:54:25 | kashyap | (Thanks, sahid for rechecking it while I was away :)) | |
| 13:56:08 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: gmann might have the links more redilaly but i think we updated the goal with it too | |
| 13:56:22 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: like this was a very very big thing that we have talked about before | |
| 13:56:48 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/governance/commit/1909d4f7a0dc2920fc04ab5bfac112a671547cee | |
| 13:56:54 | bauzas | " In yoga cycle, we redefined this goal with the changes mentioned above so that allowing system administrators to access system level resources APIs only and allow project users to access project-level resource APIs. These changes have been done for nova and neutron. " | |
| 13:57:06 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: problem is, sometimes my brain splits | |
| 13:57:14 | sean-k-mooney | it was actully in zed | |
| 13:57:43 | bauzas | so it looks to me I probably heard about it, but then it wasn't ringing the bell in my brain when I saw today's change | |
| 13:57:45 | sean-k-mooney | well it depnes but that commit has the relevent info in it | |
| 14:01:53 | sahid | kashyap: sure :-) | |
| 14:10:33 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: now all you have to do is backport it all the way to train and then cerry pick it downstream :P | |
| 14:11:20 | sean-k-mooney | so for 2 patchs that only 20 ish commits to create and review | |
| 14:11:56 | sean-k-mooney | with that said im not sure we need to backport the second patch | |
| 14:12:09 | sean-k-mooney | the frist we should but using the new api is less imporant | |
| 14:18:50 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/zed: Remove deleted projects from flavor access list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/870053 | |
| 14:26:13 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: compute: enhance compute evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858383 | |
| 14:26:14 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384 | |
| 14:27:30 | sahid | ^ fixed compute part, and owrking on the API one | |
| 14:29:59 | sahid | for the API part, is a BadRequest returned sounds good? in case that the rpc is not right and user is using new version? | |
| 14:30:17 | sahid | or do you have in mind an other http status? | |
| 14:30:42 | sahid | sean-k-mooney, bauzas ^ if you have a sec | |
| 14:31:23 | bauzas | sahid: we agreed yesterday on returning a HTTP409 Conflict | |
| 14:31:29 | sahid | ack | |
| 14:31:45 | bauzas | I think we have existing exceptions that do those | |
| 14:46:12 | sean-k-mooney | we do | |
| 14:46:35 | sean-k-mooney | we use 409 conflict anythime we dont meet the required min compute service version and in a few other cases | |
| 14:46:55 | sean-k-mooney | we used to have a mix of code but we normalised on 409 about 3 cyles ago | |
| 14:47:19 | sean-k-mooney | it used to be diffent between pmem cyborg, numa/sriov migrations ectra | |
| 14:49:02 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Heh, on the backports ... I need a bit of a breather for a few hours first from it | |
| 14:49:40 | sean-k-mooney | no worries but please propose them upstream before the downstream ones so we get the ci coverage | |
| 14:50:28 | kashyap | Ah, definitely | |
| 14:50:33 | kashyap | How far back we wanna go upstream? | |
| 14:51:31 | sean-k-mooney | so 16 is train if you want to go to 16 downstream then please do it upstream to trian too | |
| 14:51:42 | sean-k-mooney | if this is just for 17/wallaby you can stop there | |
| 14:51:45 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384 | |
| 14:52:52 | sean-k-mooney | this change shoudl be pretty safe to backprot and i dont really expect confligt | |
| 14:52:58 | sean-k-mooney | so hopefully its simple to do | |
| 14:52:58 | kashyap | Yep | |
| 14:54:11 | kashyap | I only wonder about the small logical change of the switch to using _get_cpu_model_mapping() | |
| 14:55:09 | sean-k-mooney | not using that in my view was an existing bug that shoudl have been fixed anyway | |
| 14:55:19 | sean-k-mooney | so i think its ok | |
| 14:55:28 | sean-k-mooney | we can see what elodilles thinks | |
| 14:55:42 | sean-k-mooney | or other stable cores when the first review is up | |
| 14:56:34 | sahid | sean-k-mooney, bauzas ok so i fixed the tests on compute and conductor, and changed the s/NovaException/... then i fixed REST API + tests with a HTTPConflict | |
| 15:00:08 | sean-k-mooney | sahid++ | |
| 15:00:23 | sean-k-mooney | i am just joinging a call but ill look when im free | |
| 15:01:11 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: cool thanks you, but let me ping you when CI is green, no need that you lost your time if something fails that i have not noticed ;) | |
| 15:03:03 | sean-k-mooney | sure im in calls for the hour or two | |
| 15:20:35 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Log some InstanceNotFound exceptions from libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863665 | |
| 15:20:35 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1994983 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863416 | |
| 15:38:44 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Add functional tests to reproduce bug #1960412 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845753 | |
| 15:38:55 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Clean up when queued live migration aborted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/845754 | |
| 16:45:50 | gmann | bauzas: gibi: for tempest pin on wallaby, skiptest exception is due to incompatible version of stestr in constraints. I am checking it with what tempest version work on wallaby stestr constraint. | |
| 16:46:16 | bauzas | gmann: ack thanks | |
| 16:46:34 | gmann | bauzas: for placement rbac system scope, in zed cycle direction of RBAC we have decided to drop the system scope from services that is why every policy is made to project scoped https://github.com/openstack/governance/commit/1909d4f7a0dc2920fc04ab5bfac112a671547cee | |
| 16:46:52 | gibi | gmann: thanks | |
| 16:46:54 | bauzas | gmann: yup, my brain dumped this | |
| 16:57:32 | bauzas | sahid: you made a wrong assumption when writing the conductor unittest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858383/26/nova/tests/unit/conductor/test_conductor.py#4775 | |
| 16:57:50 | bauzas | the test should pass with the call be accepted without this parameter | |
| 17:00:30 | sahid | bauzas: hum let me check | |
| 17:03:09 | sahid | hum right we should not raise an exception here, I have done that too fast and for some reason when i have executed them locally i did not noticed.. | |
| 17:03:56 | sahid | bauzas: have you noticed something else that I can fix in that same time> | |
| 17:03:59 | sahid | ? | |
| 17:11:45 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: compute: enhance compute evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858383 | |
| 17:11:46 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384 | |