| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-01-24 | |||
| 16:02:24 | bauzas | #info One Critical bug | |
| 16:02:38 | bauzas | same than last week | |
| 16:02:47 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2002951 | |
| 16:03:05 | bauzas | AFAICT, gibi's skip patch is now merged, so we can put it to High | |
| 16:03:16 | bauzas | fine ? | |
| 16:03:28 | bauzas | dansmith's series is on the fly | |
| 16:03:36 | gibi | fine | |
| 16:03:58 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/870974 skipping now the failing test | |
| 16:04:32 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/871000 proposal for fixing the test issue | |
| 16:04:45 | bauzas | dansmith: can I review it ? looks so | |
| 16:05:12 | dansmith | bauzas: you can review whatever you want :) | |
| 16:05:17 | bauzas | excellenbt | |
| 16:05:20 | dansmith | but yeah need gmann and kopecmartin to hit that I think | |
| 16:05:31 | bauzas | yup, can't +2 tempest | |
| 16:05:38 | dansmith | oh, | |
| 16:05:46 | dansmith | I need to unskip so he can see, I'll do that after this | |
| 16:06:00 | bauzas | ok, I can hold then | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:07:25 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 26 new untriaged bugs (-1 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:07:36 | bauzas | thanks gibi for the triage, any bug you wanted to raise ? | |
| 16:07:56 | gibi | bauzas: I triaged ~5 bugs, nothing serious popped up | |
| 16:08:00 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:08:40 | bauzas | I think we can easily put the number down when I look at the open ones | |
| 16:09:08 | bauzas | gibi: no worries | |
| 16:09:20 | bauzas | easy transition : | |
| 16:09:22 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:09:30 | bauzas | melwitt: are you around ? | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | she's the next in the roster | |
| 16:10:02 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:10:11 | bauzas | no worries, I'll try to reach her later | |
| 16:10:27 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:10:33 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:10:45 | bauzas | so the gate is still a bit funky | |
| 16:10:49 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 16:10:57 | dansmith | lots of sporadic fails still | |
| 16:11:05 | bauzas | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2002782 needs help | |
| 16:11:36 | bauzas | I'll try to add more logs in some DNM to try to see whether we have more explanations | |
| 16:11:50 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384 | |
| 16:12:27 | bauzas | anything people wanna discuss about it ? | |
| 16:12:39 | gibi | I have no extra input to it | |
| 16:12:54 | bauzas | gibi: I've seen you updated the bug report, thanks | |
| 16:12:58 | gibi | no worries | |
| 16:13:03 | gibi | that was part of my triage round | |
| 16:13:22 | bauzas | I just triaged it to Confirmed/High fwiw | |
| 16:13:53 | gibi | ack | |
| 16:14:01 | gibi | I did not want to triage my one bug | |
| 16:14:04 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:14:06 | bauzas | https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=nova-tox-functional&job_name=nova-tox-functional-py310&project=openstack%2Fnova&skip=0 | |
| 16:14:13 | bauzas | this is wedgy | |
| 16:14:29 | bauzas | but at least the gate isn't hold | |
| 16:14:49 | bauzas | (assuming we have true positives in that list) | |
| 16:15:10 | gibi | filtering that to the gate pipeline is a bit better | |
| 16:15:27 | bauzas | true, it avoids the true positives | |
| 16:15:29 | gibi | but that does not show patches that are good but fail on check | |
| 16:15:36 | gibi | so meh | |
| 16:15:54 | bauzas | ideally, we should filter on the right exception :) | |
| 16:16:09 | bauzas | hence not with zuul :) | |
| 16:16:17 | bauzas | but meh, moving on | |
| 16:16:18 | gibi | yeah yeah | |
| 16:16:19 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:16:28 | bauzas | hear hear | |
| 16:16:49 | bauzas | all periodic jobs turn green this week \o/ | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly | |
| 16:17:00 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:17:15 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:17:23 | bauzas | and as a reminder | |
| 16:17:28 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:17:49 | bauzas | I haven't looked at the percentage number of blind rechecks since last year | |
| 16:18:06 | bauzas | but hopefully, should be super small given I say it literally everyweek, eh ? | |
| 16:18:26 | gibi | I did 0 blind one an a ton of proper one :) | |
| 16:18:39 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:18:43 | gibi | so at least the statistic will be nice :) | |
| 16:18:49 | sean-k-mooney | maybe | |
| 16:18:58 | sean-k-mooney | you put the messasge on the next line a few times | |
| 16:19:05 | sean-k-mooney | not sure if the script takes that into account | |
| 16:19:16 | sean-k-mooney | you did provide a reason in all the ones i saw | |
| 16:19:33 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:19:39 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:19:47 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: good point, the issue is we have multiple failed jon in a single run :) | |
| 16:19:50 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:19:58 | bauzas | #info Antelope-3 is in 3 weeks | |
| 16:20:03 | bauzas | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/antelope All accepted blueprints for 2023.1 | |
| 16:20:14 | bauzas | use this loudly ^ | |
| 16:20:47 | bauzas | as a reminder, not all blueprints have specs, so this is the single source of truth for the featurefreeze | |
| 16:21:03 | bauzas | and I have a question | |
| 16:21:29 | bauzas | should I somehow put something explicit against blueprints that have API impact (ie. a microversion support) ? | |
| 16:21:44 | bauzas | in order to ease people's thoughts on what to review | |
| 16:22:06 | bauzas | my proposal would be to use the Priority flag which is honestly not in use today | |
| 16:22:19 | bauzas | I can't add tags on a blueprint | |
| 16:22:21 | sean-k-mooney | i think we have 3 with api changes | |
| 16:22:31 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure we should nessisarly priortiese them by default | |
| 16:22:39 | sean-k-mooney | but we could | |
| 16:22:56 | bauzas | technically the priority flag would just be a 'flag' for saying this is a api change | |
| 16:22:56 | sean-k-mooney | too basd we cant add a generic tags filed in that view | |
| 16:23:01 | sean-k-mooney | that is what i would prefer honestly | |
| 16:23:48 | bauzas | I can modify the blueprint name | |
| 16:23:51 | sean-k-mooney | i would perhaps just not track this in launchpad | |
| 16:23:59 | bauzas | by adding some [api] prefix | |
| 16:24:05 | bauzas | if that helps | |
| 16:24:11 | sean-k-mooney | that will break the specs | |