Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-01-10
16:00:58 kgube o/
16:01:05 elodilles o/
16:01:17 sean-k-mooney o/
16:01:18 Uggla o/
16:01:26 Kirill_ o/
16:01:29 bauzas welcome everyone
16:01:48 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:01:53 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:01:57 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 27 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting)
16:02:02 bauzas I have to do my duty
16:02:27 bauzas if someone has time for triaging upstream bugs, that'd be lovely but I can do it
16:02:35 bauzas and then we'll go back to the roster
16:02:41 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:03:22 Uggla bauzas, bug triage, I can do it is it helps you.
16:03:27 gibi +1 for the roster
16:03:51 bauzas Uggla: I'll take the baton for this week, but if you want, we can both look at bugs
16:04:07 bauzas #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas
16:04:29 bauzas any particular urgent bug to discuss ?
16:04:40 bauzas I guess we'll discuss the tox saga in the next chapter
16:04:59 bauzas if no, let's move on and go to the gate topic
16:05:06 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:05:12 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:05:16 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:05:21 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job
16:05:26 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:05:30 gibi placement and nova gate is unblocked as far as I know. we merged the two tox4 patches
16:05:31 bauzas #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:05:51 bauzas I was about to tell it once I was done with the weekly items
16:05:52 bauzas so,
16:06:12 gibi I see nova patches progressing in the gate queue
16:06:17 gibi so I think we are OK
16:06:33 gibi I haven't chacked osc-placement and python-novaclient status
16:06:40 gibi os-vif should be unblocked too
16:06:46 gmann their master gate is good, I checked
16:06:54 gmann but for stable branch gate, python-novaclient patches need to merge #link https://review.opendev.org/q/I442568a5f5900e593feb2b5527109e0aa79e5aa7+status:open
16:07:12 dansmith nice
16:07:15 gmann and osc-placement is failing <= stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/869451
16:07:17 bauzas #info we had a funky week due to tox4 but now gate is better https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031709.html
16:07:41 gmann it is failing on placement functionla job where we use master placement but stable branch constraints so mismatch
16:07:42 bauzas gmann: cool, I'll look at the novaclient patch
16:08:11 gmann I cannot remember why we do not use master constraints in that placement functional job?
16:08:12 bauzas oh, I did it already
16:08:13 gibi the there are follow up request for nova and placement too: i) remove the install_command usage ii) check if pdf doc build works or not
16:08:33 gibi gmann: we should I believe
16:08:43 gmann this one https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/master/tox.ini#L30
16:09:26 sean-k-mooney we want it t o run against master i belvie
16:09:28 gibi gmann: hm, do we have placement in the upper-constraints?
16:09:43 sean-k-mooney perhaps although we shoudl not
16:09:54 sean-k-mooney only lib projects should eb in uc
16:09:57 gmann gibi: no because we use it from master source
16:10:12 bauzas sean-k-mooney: this is for testing placement itself
16:10:22 gibi this is testing osc-placement I believe
16:10:22 bauzas so we need the latest
16:10:32 bauzas correct
16:10:36 gmann yeah testing osc-placement with master placement
16:10:42 sean-k-mooney its the fucntional test for placement openstackclient plugin
16:10:45 gibi and constarints are inherited from https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/fdf10423bf29b7cfd5e88d9d06e1313ee881ab80/tox.ini#L17
16:10:48 bauzas we're discussing of testing osc-placement
16:10:59 bauzas using placement master branch
16:11:07 sean-k-mooney yes and how the functional job forces the master branch of placment
16:11:14 bauzas yup
16:11:18 gmann gibi: it use stable/yoga for yoga testing #link https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/stable/yoga/tox.ini#L18
16:11:18 sean-k-mooney i think this was because fo the placment fixture
16:11:23 gmann for master it is all good
16:11:28 gmann master gate
16:11:33 bauzas agreed with gmann
16:11:34 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/commit/da8cd4d68b06399c607776db2a704b4578146996
16:11:45 gibi I don't see the issue sorry
16:11:54 gmann for stable/zed somehow constraints matches so we do not see failure
16:11:55 sean-k-mooney so the tox.ini is correct
16:11:55 bauzas if I have a osc client patch, I don't wanna hold my check on a placement release
16:12:25 gmann sean-k-mooney: stable/yoga constraints will not work with latest placement
16:12:39 bauzas anyway, tox4 upgrade was fun
16:12:45 gmann that is why it is failing on os-traits version mismatch
16:13:02 sean-k-mooney for stable branchs we likely need to pin yes
16:13:26 gmann yeah, either pin placement or use master constraints for this latest placement testing
16:13:27 sean-k-mooney bauzas: likely not because they handel constratits differnrlty
16:13:42 gmann anyways we can discuss it after meeting as it seems need more discussions
16:13:43 gibi gmann: so on stable/yoga this is an issue https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/stable/yoga/tox.ini#L31
16:13:57 gibi as it install master placement on stable yoga
16:14:09 gmann gibi: yes.
16:14:11 sean-k-mooney ya so we just need to pin the branch in that line which is posible
16:14:14 gibi OK I got it
16:14:21 elodilles as i remember constraints from master also caused issues on stable branches (in placement)
16:14:30 bauzas sean-k-mooney: yeah, my point is that if the tox developers don't verify the behaviours of tox.ini and rather say they just verify the toml ones, then I'm a bit afraid
16:14:47 sean-k-mooney bauzas: its not related to that
16:15:14 sean-k-mooney bauzas: openstack is quite differnt form ontehr python project in how we use setuptools/pbr and the idea of a constratis file
16:15:23 gmann all other stable branches gate are good. I tested them after pin
16:15:32 gibi bauzas: tox4 was a rewrite, and they are not intending to keep all the tox3 behavior (I learned yesterday)
16:15:43 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sure I'm not saying we should create a pyproject.toml filze
16:15:50 gibi gmann: thanks!
16:16:06 bauzas sean-k-mooney: but I was wondering why nobody was finding the problem until we told them
16:16:08 sean-k-mooney bauzas: well that has been discussed and we might want to eventually but we should lop back to one topic
16:16:25 sean-k-mooney bauzas: because constrait files is baicaly an openstack thing
16:16:44 bauzas sean-k-mooney: we didn't had only problems with constraints
16:16:45 clarkb sean-k-mooney: openstack is the primary user in the wild probably but it is a normal pip functionality
16:16:53 sean-k-mooney we are the comunity that drove that in pip
16:17:10 sean-k-mooney but yes its is a pip capablity
16:17:11 bauzas gibi: ack, good to know
16:17:14 clarkb bauzas: fwiw I'm helping to move zuul and opendev projects to nox

Earlier   Later