| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-01-10 | |||
| 15:47:07 | bauzas | (tbc, when I say 'mounting' this is wrong, I rather mean 'instead of creating a mount point for' so it would be mounted on the guest) | |
| 15:47:26 | bauzas | as a reminder, btw. nova meeting in 13 mins here | |
| 15:48:04 | Uggla | in the guest you will have a dir ex: /var/lib/scaphandre/ and inside intel-rapl:0:0 so you map /var/lib/libvirt/scaphandre/<vmname> to somewhere on the guest | |
| 15:49:39 | Uggla | but this is scaphandre that create /var/lib/libvirt/scaphandre/<vmname>/intel-rapl:0:0 on the host and vmname is coming from qemu cmdline. | |
| 15:50:46 | Uggla | bauzas, if you want we can have a quick chat after nova meeting. | |
| 15:52:34 | Uggla | bauzas, to my mind it works even if vmname change. | |
| 15:55:44 | bauzas | Uggla: who's creating the mount ? | |
| 15:56:05 | bauzas | is it automatically done by scaphandre or does the operator need to do it ? | |
| 15:56:31 | Uggla | scaphandre will create the "path" | |
| 15:56:43 | bauzas | who exposes it thru virtiosfs ? | |
| 15:57:56 | Uggla | nova | |
| 15:58:10 | bauzas | and without nova ? | |
| 15:58:29 | Uggla | user | |
| 15:58:30 | bauzas | this has to be configured ? | |
| 15:58:38 | bauzas | ok, cool enough then | |
| 15:58:45 | bauzas | so, | |
| 15:58:53 | bauzas | we have the nova meeting in a sec | |
| 15:59:01 | bauzas | but we can indeed discuss that later | |
| 15:59:07 | bauzas | because I don't think it's a problem | |
| 15:59:36 | bauzas | unless I'm wrong | |
| 16:00:08 | bauzas | anyway, there it goes | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:12 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jan 10 16:00:12 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:12 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:21 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:00:45 | bauzas | good UTC afternoon everyone | |
| 16:00:48 | bauzas | who's around ? | |
| 16:00:49 | dansmith | Oj | |
| 16:00:51 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:53 | gmann | o/ | |
| 16:00:58 | kgube | o/ | |
| 16:01:05 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:17 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:01:18 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:01:26 | Kirill_ | o/ | |
| 16:01:29 | bauzas | welcome everyone | |
| 16:01:48 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:01:53 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:01:57 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 27 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | I have to do my duty | |
| 16:02:27 | bauzas | if someone has time for triaging upstream bugs, that'd be lovely but I can do it | |
| 16:02:35 | bauzas | and then we'll go back to the roster | |
| 16:02:41 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:22 | Uggla | bauzas, bug triage, I can do it is it helps you. | |
| 16:03:27 | gibi | +1 for the roster | |
| 16:03:51 | bauzas | Uggla: I'll take the baton for this week, but if you want, we can both look at bugs | |
| 16:04:07 | bauzas | #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas | |
| 16:04:29 | bauzas | any particular urgent bug to discuss ? | |
| 16:04:40 | bauzas | I guess we'll discuss the tox saga in the next chapter | |
| 16:04:59 | bauzas | if no, let's move on and go to the gate topic | |
| 16:05:06 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:12 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:16 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job | |
| 16:05:26 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:05:30 | gibi | placement and nova gate is unblocked as far as I know. we merged the two tox4 patches | |
| 16:05:31 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:05:51 | bauzas | I was about to tell it once I was done with the weekly items | |
| 16:05:52 | bauzas | so, | |
| 16:06:12 | gibi | I see nova patches progressing in the gate queue | |
| 16:06:17 | gibi | so I think we are OK | |
| 16:06:33 | gibi | I haven't chacked osc-placement and python-novaclient status | |
| 16:06:40 | gibi | os-vif should be unblocked too | |
| 16:06:46 | gmann | their master gate is good, I checked | |
| 16:06:54 | gmann | but for stable branch gate, python-novaclient patches need to merge #link https://review.opendev.org/q/I442568a5f5900e593feb2b5527109e0aa79e5aa7+status:open | |
| 16:07:12 | dansmith | nice | |
| 16:07:15 | gmann | and osc-placement is failing <= stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/869451 | |
| 16:07:17 | bauzas | #info we had a funky week due to tox4 but now gate is better https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-January/031709.html | |
| 16:07:41 | gmann | it is failing on placement functionla job where we use master placement but stable branch constraints so mismatch | |
| 16:07:42 | bauzas | gmann: cool, I'll look at the novaclient patch | |
| 16:08:11 | gmann | I cannot remember why we do not use master constraints in that placement functional job? | |
| 16:08:12 | bauzas | oh, I did it already | |
| 16:08:13 | gibi | the there are follow up request for nova and placement too: i) remove the install_command usage ii) check if pdf doc build works or not | |
| 16:08:33 | gibi | gmann: we should I believe | |
| 16:08:43 | gmann | this one https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/master/tox.ini#L30 | |
| 16:09:26 | sean-k-mooney | we want it t o run against master i belvie | |
| 16:09:28 | gibi | gmann: hm, do we have placement in the upper-constraints? | |
| 16:09:43 | sean-k-mooney | perhaps although we shoudl not | |
| 16:09:54 | sean-k-mooney | only lib projects should eb in uc | |
| 16:09:57 | gmann | gibi: no because we use it from master source | |
| 16:10:12 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: this is for testing placement itself | |
| 16:10:22 | gibi | this is testing osc-placement I believe | |
| 16:10:22 | bauzas | so we need the latest | |
| 16:10:32 | bauzas | correct | |
| 16:10:36 | gmann | yeah testing osc-placement with master placement | |
| 16:10:42 | sean-k-mooney | its the fucntional test for placement openstackclient plugin | |
| 16:10:45 | gibi | and constarints are inherited from https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/fdf10423bf29b7cfd5e88d9d06e1313ee881ab80/tox.ini#L17 | |
| 16:10:48 | bauzas | we're discussing of testing osc-placement | |
| 16:10:59 | bauzas | using placement master branch | |
| 16:11:07 | sean-k-mooney | yes and how the functional job forces the master branch of placment | |
| 16:11:14 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:11:18 | gmann | gibi: it use stable/yoga for yoga testing #link https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/blob/stable/yoga/tox.ini#L18 | |
| 16:11:18 | sean-k-mooney | i think this was because fo the placment fixture | |
| 16:11:23 | gmann | for master it is all good | |
| 16:11:28 | gmann | master gate | |
| 16:11:33 | bauzas | agreed with gmann | |
| 16:11:34 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/osc-placement/commit/da8cd4d68b06399c607776db2a704b4578146996 | |
| 16:11:45 | gibi | I don't see the issue sorry | |
| 16:11:54 | gmann | for stable/zed somehow constraints matches so we do not see failure | |