| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-22 | |||
| 16:31:33 | gibi | rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=3.2.3] | |
| 16:31:55 | gibi | ie https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841444/4 | |
| 16:32:06 | gibi | s/ie/eg/ | |
| 16:32:34 | elodilles | gibi: rsync problem usually happened due to infra issues, but those usually temporary / intermittent issues | |
| 16:33:02 | elodilles | gibi: train is blocked, see above :) | |
| 16:33:05 | gibi | I got it mutliple times. I did a rebase at the start of the meeting if that hits the same I will ping the team again as that will mean it is blocked | |
| 16:33:08 | opendevmeet | Current chairs: bauzas gibi | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | #chair gibi | |
| 16:33:26 | bauzas | (just added gibi for chair, not sure the bot will correctly set the topics) | |
| 16:33:35 | gibi | elodilles: aaah, | |
| 16:33:45 | gibi | sorry it is a bit hard to be on two meetings in parallel | |
| 16:33:51 | gibi | so we know that train is broken | |
| 16:33:53 | elodilles | :S | |
| 16:33:57 | gibi | then I have no other question :) | |
| 16:34:04 | elodilles | gibi: yepp, but not with the rsync error | |
| 16:34:25 | elodilles | so that's a new thing if it is a permanent problem :( | |
| 16:34:26 | gibi | interesting | |
| 16:34:28 | bauzas | we should name the train bug "sncf" as train is always broken :) | |
| 16:34:42 | gibi | anyhow I will report back if the same failure happens in the recent rebase too | |
| 16:34:58 | elodilles | gibi: ack, thx | |
| 16:35:07 | gibi | I thank you :) | |
| 16:35:17 | gibi | any other topics on stable? | |
| 16:35:23 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:35:57 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:36:01 | bauzas | I'll need to speak in a little | |
| 16:36:26 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:36:30 | gibi | (jsanemet) Improve usage of privsep on Nova: | |
| 16:36:31 | gibi | Bug ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1996213 Proposal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review Does the change deserve a spec? | |
| 16:36:48 | bauzas | yeah so | |
| 16:37:22 | gibi | jsanemet: on the spec question. Do you feel you have open question that would need upfront decision from the core team? | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | I discussed with jsanemet about his efforts and I proposed him to present himself and discuss about how we could paper the privsep effort during the meeting | |
| 16:37:40 | bauzas | the spec thing was more a wonder we had | |
| 16:37:52 | bauzas | I don't honestly feel it requires one spec | |
| 16:38:06 | bauzas | but we tho need to consider documenting the new context usages | |
| 16:38:12 | bauzas | hence the etherpad | |
| 16:38:52 | jsanemet | hello | |
| 16:38:53 | bauzas | I don't see any upgrade impact, or any other impact which would require us to accept a spedc | |
| 16:39:38 | bauzas | anyone disagree with that plan ? | |
| 16:40:21 | dansmith | what is the effort? just finishing some things? | |
| 16:40:28 | dansmith | or something more complex? | |
| 16:40:29 | bauzas | dansmith: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review | |
| 16:40:42 | bauzas | dansmith: this is about fine-graining the privsep context to the right callers | |
| 16:40:43 | sean-k-mooney | there are several | |
| 16:40:58 | sean-k-mooney | this looks like the first low haning fruit | |
| 16:40:59 | dansmith | yeah so splitting into different contexts? | |
| 16:41:06 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:41:08 | bauzas | as a first step yes | |
| 16:41:21 | dansmith | I dunno, I think that's going to be a bunch of review of which calls need which contexts right? | |
| 16:41:31 | bauzas | that's my concern | |
| 16:41:35 | bauzas | I don't think we need a spec | |
| 16:41:35 | dansmith | some things might seem simple but require both net and sys, etc | |
| 16:41:38 | bauzas | but, | |
| 16:42:01 | dansmith | I guess I'm not sure why no spec | |
| 16:42:03 | bauzas | I'd appreciate if we would agree on the contexts and the callers not exacly by reviewing the patches | |
| 16:42:07 | dansmith | this etherpad is half a spec already | |
| 16:42:15 | sean-k-mooney | there proably should be a spec to define the scope | |
| 16:42:21 | dansmith | agree | |
| 16:42:27 | bauzas | there, we have our answer | |
| 16:42:37 | bauzas | we can use the spec format to agree on the split | |
| 16:42:57 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:43:30 | bauzas | jsanemet: you're ok with the outcome ? | |
| 16:43:39 | bauzas | I can help you on the process-y thingie | |
| 16:44:05 | jsanemet | sure | |
| 16:44:22 | jsanemet | then, i will translate the etherpad into a spec and we can discuss it further | |
| 16:44:26 | jsanemet | seems good to me | |
| 16:44:33 | bauzas | from a paperwork pov, you may also need to supersede the rfe bug by creating a launchpad blueprint | |
| 16:44:48 | bauzas | but that's an easy peasy | |
| 16:45:01 | bauzas | anyway, looks like we have the direction | |
| 16:45:06 | jsanemet | yes, i am a little green regarding what documentation is required so any help will be appreciated | |
| 16:45:39 | bauzas | jsanemet: as a reminder, you have a spec template https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2023.1/template.html | |
| 16:46:10 | bauzas | I guess that's it for today | |
| 16:46:11 | jsanemet | all right, i will save that | |
| 16:46:15 | jsanemet | thanks a lot | |
| 16:46:36 | bauzas | ok, folks, any other item to raise before we call the wrap ? | |
| 16:46:58 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:47:01 | bauzas | perfect timing | |
| 16:47:05 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:47:08 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.log.html | |
| 16:47:08 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.txt | |
| 16:47:08 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-22-16.01.html | |
| 16:47:08 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Nov 22 16:47:08 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:47:08 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:47:12 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:47:13 | elodilles | thanks bauzas o/ | |
| 16:47:26 | gibi | thanks folks | |
| 16:47:37 | jsanemet | thanks o/ | |
| 17:36:21 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: bauzas: replied on focal new job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/861111/5/.zuul.yaml#653 | |
| 17:36:52 | gmann | basically grenade job run only smoke test not all the tests. having a integrated job running on focal cover it well | |
| 17:37:42 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: im not sure we want full coverage since we are only supprotign it for upgrade but we could i guess | |
| 17:38:04 | sean-k-mooney | we run more then smoke in the multinode grenade job by the way | |
| 17:38:12 | sean-k-mooney | liek cold/live migration | |
| 17:38:14 | gmann | that was point there in PTG, to make sure we run the complete tests | |
| 17:38:43 | sean-k-mooney | that kind fo feels like overkill to me | |
| 17:38:52 | gmann | that is why we added Focal i testing runtime too https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/2023.1.html | |
| 17:38:59 | sean-k-mooney | we never did that for moving form 18.04->20.04 did we | |
| 17:39:20 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: this is new change we discussed in TC | |
| 17:39:36 | gmann | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/860599 | |
| 17:39:46 | sean-k-mooney | ok but if its just for upgrade im not sure we shoudl do more then run multinode grenade | |
| 17:40:49 | gmann | multinode grenade does not run complete tests, if testing runtime have requirement of testing Focal I feel we should run integrated tests on that not just grenade small set of tests | |
| 17:41:09 | sean-k-mooney | i disagree | |