| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-22 | |||
| 16:18:29 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html | |
| 16:18:34 | bauzas | #info Antelope-1 was last week | |
| 16:18:39 | bauzas | #info Spec review day had 6 specs merged and more than 10 others being discussed. | |
| 16:18:48 | bauzas | kudos to the reviewers who worked on it | |
| 16:19:21 | bauzas | as a reminder, we will get another spec review day in a couple of weeks before milestone-2 | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | we should also plan some implementation review day around between a-1 and a-2 | |
| 16:20:30 | bauzas | voilà , anything to discuss about either the spec review day or antelope-1 ? | |
| 16:21:32 | bauzas | fwiw, we merged a release for novaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/861360 | |
| 16:21:52 | bauzas | and ditto for os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/864527 | |
| 16:22:29 | bauzas | if no questions, let's move on | |
| 16:26:47 | bauzas | sorry, I'm being dragged in a meeting, can someone continue ? | |
| 16:26:49 | bauzas | gibi: ? | |
| 16:27:03 | gibi | sure I will try | |
| 16:27:29 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:27:35 | gibi | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:27:40 | gibi | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:27:54 | gibi | is there anything we need to discuss on these priorities? | |
| 16:28:43 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:52 | gibi | elodilles: your turn :) | |
| 16:29:04 | gibi | I have a quetion on stable/train | |
| 16:29:26 | elodilles | #info wallaby is blocked due to failing nova-ceph-multistore, workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/865134 | |
| 16:29:45 | elodilles | this is an interesting one, stable cores, please review if possible ^^^ | |
| 16:29:55 | elodilles | #info ussuri and train is blocked due to nova-multi-cell job, possible fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/865300 | |
| 16:30:15 | elodilles | ^^^ thanks sean-k-mooney for calling my attention to the issue :) | |
| 16:30:26 | elodilles | #info rest of the stable branches should be OK | |
| 16:30:33 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:30:43 | elodilles | and that's it from my side | |
| 16:30:43 | sean-k-mooney | i appoved the first one addign os-brick to requried project will also make depends on work | |
| 16:31:14 | gibi | elodilles: do you know about any issues on stable/train | |
| 16:31:29 | bauzas | ok, I'm back | |
| 16:31:30 | gibi | rsync: [sender] link_stat "/var/lib/zuul/builds/eacfbbe59b6a4297a4aebb16cc7d2140/work/ca-bundle.pem" failed: No such file or directory (2) | |
| 16:31:30 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks. i think that is the most straightforward workaround for the situation | |
| 16:31:30 | gibi | I see multiple job failing with | |
| 16:31:33 | gibi | rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=3.2.3] | |
| 16:31:55 | gibi | ie https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/841444/4 | |
| 16:32:06 | gibi | s/ie/eg/ | |
| 16:32:34 | elodilles | gibi: rsync problem usually happened due to infra issues, but those usually temporary / intermittent issues | |
| 16:33:02 | elodilles | gibi: train is blocked, see above :) | |
| 16:33:05 | gibi | I got it mutliple times. I did a rebase at the start of the meeting if that hits the same I will ping the team again as that will mean it is blocked | |
| 16:33:08 | opendevmeet | Current chairs: bauzas gibi | |
| 16:33:08 | bauzas | #chair gibi | |
| 16:33:26 | bauzas | (just added gibi for chair, not sure the bot will correctly set the topics) | |
| 16:33:35 | gibi | elodilles: aaah, | |
| 16:33:45 | gibi | sorry it is a bit hard to be on two meetings in parallel | |
| 16:33:51 | gibi | so we know that train is broken | |
| 16:33:53 | elodilles | :S | |
| 16:33:57 | gibi | then I have no other question :) | |
| 16:34:04 | elodilles | gibi: yepp, but not with the rsync error | |
| 16:34:25 | elodilles | so that's a new thing if it is a permanent problem :( | |
| 16:34:26 | gibi | interesting | |
| 16:34:28 | bauzas | we should name the train bug "sncf" as train is always broken :) | |
| 16:34:42 | gibi | anyhow I will report back if the same failure happens in the recent rebase too | |
| 16:34:58 | elodilles | gibi: ack, thx | |
| 16:35:07 | gibi | I thank you :) | |
| 16:35:17 | gibi | any other topics on stable? | |
| 16:35:23 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:35:57 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:36:01 | bauzas | I'll need to speak in a little | |
| 16:36:26 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:36:30 | gibi | (jsanemet) Improve usage of privsep on Nova: | |
| 16:36:31 | gibi | Bug ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1996213 Proposal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review Does the change deserve a spec? | |
| 16:36:48 | bauzas | yeah so | |
| 16:37:22 | gibi | jsanemet: on the spec question. Do you feel you have open question that would need upfront decision from the core team? | |
| 16:37:25 | bauzas | I discussed with jsanemet about his efforts and I proposed him to present himself and discuss about how we could paper the privsep effort during the meeting | |
| 16:37:40 | bauzas | the spec thing was more a wonder we had | |
| 16:37:52 | bauzas | I don't honestly feel it requires one spec | |
| 16:38:06 | bauzas | but we tho need to consider documenting the new context usages | |
| 16:38:12 | bauzas | hence the etherpad | |
| 16:38:52 | jsanemet | hello | |
| 16:38:53 | bauzas | I don't see any upgrade impact, or any other impact which would require us to accept a spedc | |
| 16:39:38 | bauzas | anyone disagree with that plan ? | |
| 16:40:21 | dansmith | what is the effort? just finishing some things? | |
| 16:40:28 | dansmith | or something more complex? | |
| 16:40:29 | bauzas | dansmith: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-privsep-review | |
| 16:40:42 | bauzas | dansmith: this is about fine-graining the privsep context to the right callers | |
| 16:40:43 | sean-k-mooney | there are several | |
| 16:40:58 | sean-k-mooney | this looks like the first low haning fruit | |
| 16:40:59 | dansmith | yeah so splitting into different contexts? | |
| 16:41:06 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:41:08 | bauzas | as a first step yes | |
| 16:41:21 | dansmith | I dunno, I think that's going to be a bunch of review of which calls need which contexts right? | |
| 16:41:31 | bauzas | that's my concern | |
| 16:41:35 | bauzas | I don't think we need a spec | |
| 16:41:35 | dansmith | some things might seem simple but require both net and sys, etc | |
| 16:41:38 | bauzas | but, | |
| 16:42:01 | dansmith | I guess I'm not sure why no spec | |
| 16:42:03 | bauzas | I'd appreciate if we would agree on the contexts and the callers not exacly by reviewing the patches | |
| 16:42:07 | dansmith | this etherpad is half a spec already | |
| 16:42:15 | sean-k-mooney | there proably should be a spec to define the scope | |
| 16:42:21 | dansmith | agree | |
| 16:42:27 | bauzas | there, we have our answer | |
| 16:42:37 | bauzas | we can use the spec format to agree on the split | |
| 16:42:57 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:43:30 | bauzas | jsanemet: you're ok with the outcome ? | |
| 16:43:39 | bauzas | I can help you on the process-y thingie | |
| 16:44:05 | jsanemet | sure | |
| 16:44:22 | jsanemet | then, i will translate the etherpad into a spec and we can discuss it further | |
| 16:44:26 | jsanemet | seems good to me | |
| 16:44:33 | bauzas | from a paperwork pov, you may also need to supersede the rfe bug by creating a launchpad blueprint | |
| 16:44:48 | bauzas | but that's an easy peasy | |