| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-16 | |||
| 13:13:35 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864691 | |
| 13:14:49 | sean-k-mooney | Kirill_: currently we are using the ironic client for most things realted to ironic https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/ironic/client_wrapper.py#L57 | |
| 13:15:42 | Kirill_ | i'd like to do smth like this:console = self.ironicclient.call('node.get_console', node_uuid = node_uuid) | |
| 13:15:47 | sean-k-mooney | but we do use the sdk in places | |
| 13:15:48 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py#L378-L385 | |
| 13:16:05 | Kirill_ | get_console_> get_vnc_password | |
| 13:17:07 | sean-k-mooney | where is the vnc password stored | |
| 13:17:18 | sean-k-mooney | is it directly on the node | |
| 13:17:19 | Kirill_ | in ironic, idrac-info | |
| 13:17:34 | Kirill_ | on node | |
| 13:18:13 | Kirill_ | node show will return vnc_pasword:**** | |
| 13:18:42 | sean-k-mooney | ok we alreay have a get node function https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/ironic/driver.py#L215-L226 | |
| 13:19:20 | sean-k-mooney | so you should jsut be able to call that and do pwd = node.vnc_password | |
| 13:21:10 | Kirill_ | yep, sound good | |
| 13:23:09 | sean-k-mooney | i dont directly see it here https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/baremetal/v1/node.py#L97-L246 but its proably there on a sub filed of one of those properties | |
| 13:25:54 | sean-k-mooney | its not directly in https://github.com/openstack/python-ironicclient/blob/master/ironicclient/v1/node.py either so im guessing its a subfield | |
| 13:26:58 | Kirill_ | thanks, need to check it | |
| 13:40:03 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864730 | |
| 13:41:52 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864730 | |
| 13:48:28 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864732 | |
| 13:51:15 | opendevreview | Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Cleanup old resize instances dir before resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864692 | |
| 14:05:58 | Uggla | bauzas, shit ! I have just encountered a "great python" ! ;) | |
| 14:17:15 | bauzas | sorry, was at the doc for a inflamed shoulder ;) | |
| 14:40:05 | sahid | o/ gibi,sean-k-mooney again me :-) About your point on the spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838 | |
| 14:40:46 | sahid | so I have to add a check to here which verifies that the RPC version is supported | |
| 14:40:49 | sahid | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384/19/nova/api/openstack/compute/evacuate.py#98 | |
| 14:41:34 | sahid | that is the point? I'm verify sorry I'm not so famialiar with the API/RPC part | |
| 14:44:46 | sean-k-mooney | so indie that if | |
| 14:44:51 | sean-k-mooney | *inside | |
| 14:45:01 | sean-k-mooney | you can get the min compute service verion | |
| 14:45:13 | sean-k-mooney | and raise an excption if it below the one required for your feature | |
| 14:45:29 | sahid | perfect, got it! | |
| 14:45:35 | sahid | thanks a lot | |
| 14:46:07 | sean-k-mooney | min_ver = objects.service.get_minimum_version_all_cells( | |
| 14:46:09 | sean-k-mooney | nova_context.get_admin_context(), ['nova-compute'] | |
| 14:46:11 | sean-k-mooney | ) | |
| 14:46:13 | sean-k-mooney | that will give you the min version | |
| 14:46:32 | sean-k-mooney | so just to if min_ver < X raise ... | |
| 14:47:05 | sahid | :-) | |
| 14:47:22 | sean-k-mooney | we normally do this latter but its similar to do it there | |
| 16:14:27 | opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/nova master: Nova to honor "cross_az_attach" during server(VM) migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864760 | |
| 16:27:03 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I'm not opposed to the fact we don't hardly specific cpu governors in nova and we let the operator decide which ones they want https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/861591/comments/6a5d4488_55cda4bd | |
| 16:27:17 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: but I wonder how we could let the operators *specify* it | |
| 16:27:27 | bauzas | a ListOpt doesn't really help | |
| 16:27:51 | bauzas | as we would need to guess which governor is the powersaving one and which one is the best performant | |
| 16:28:41 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: and I feel a DictOpt is too much painful to add | |
| 16:29:10 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: see my concern ? | |
| 16:39:25 | sean-k-mooney | well i was thinking of having the first be the low power and second high | |
| 16:39:37 | sean-k-mooney | but you could just add 2 config options | |
| 16:39:43 | sean-k-mooney | for high and low | |
| 16:40:03 | sean-k-mooney | dictopts are supporte by oslo but we dont currently use them in nova | |
| 16:40:25 | bauzas | correct hence me reluctant | |
| 16:40:40 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: its really just the active/high-power one that we really care about | |
| 16:40:59 | sean-k-mooney | powersave runs the cpu at the lowest frequency it can without turning off | |
| 16:41:10 | sean-k-mooney | performance is the opicite | |
| 16:41:31 | sean-k-mooney | in general you would not want to hardcode perfromace if your trying to manage power | |
| 16:41:58 | sean-k-mooney | so if the high power one was configurable that woudl be enough | |
| 16:42:15 | sean-k-mooney | if you want to keep it simple howwever why not add two config options | |
| 16:42:36 | sean-k-mooney | cpu_high_power_govoner and cpu_low_power_govoner | |
| 16:42:41 | sean-k-mooney | just simple stings | |
| 16:42:58 | bauzas | yup, that's what I write now | |
| 16:43:05 | sean-k-mooney | works for me | |
| 16:43:10 | bauzas | we could bikeshed on the namings | |
| 16:43:11 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ^ | |
| 16:43:52 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposes cpu power managment in libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/861591 | |
| 16:43:59 | bauzas | there you go | |
| 17:10:27 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate mdev creation and hardfail on reboot when missing. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864418 | |
| 17:10:28 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Handle mdev devices in libvirt 7.7+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/838976 | |
| 17:10:28 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Reproducer for bug 1951656 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850673 | |
| 17:25:46 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Ironic nodes with instance reserved in placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864773 | |
| 17:28:23 | johnthetubaguy | gibi: I think I may have found an "interesting" way to close that ironic scheduler race with automatic clean, but it feels a bit wrong, its a follow on from that patch you reviewed yesterday: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864773 | |
| 17:31:34 | gibi | johnthetubaguy: that is a clever one | |
| 17:32:21 | johnthetubaguy | it might be too clever, but it seems to work... funky right? | |
| 17:33:10 | gibi | I think we intentionally designed placement in a way that it allows reserving already allocated inventories | |
| 17:33:27 | gibi | but not allow allocating reserved ones | |
| 17:33:47 | gibi | so I think what you do is OK from placement perspective | |
| 17:36:22 | gibi | how likely that a big ironic deployment has no cleaning configured and the update_provider_tree periodic is set to a big value due to preformance reasons? | |
| 17:36:35 | johnthetubaguy | OK, neat. I remember some related discussions around increasing host reserved memory, and it sounded OK ish. | |
| 17:37:14 | johnthetubaguy | ... unsure, that is a very good question. Most large deployments I work on do automatic cleaning, but I know that far from representative | |
| 17:37:38 | johnthetubaguy | (I have to run I am afraid, I am told my dinner is going cold) | |
| 17:37:59 | gibi | johnthetubaguy: no worries. I will leave the feedback in the review | |
| 17:40:42 | gibi | have a nice dinner | |
| 17:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | o/ just saw the comment on ironic reivew | |
| 17:46:08 | sean-k-mooney | is the plan to proceed with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842478 anyway | |
| 17:46:17 | sean-k-mooney | if so i can review again tomorrow | |
| 17:47:44 | sean-k-mooney | i am mostly out of brain power today but i dont mind looking at it in the morning | |
| 17:48:41 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864773 is the other one? to review with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842478 | |
| 17:51:52 | sean-k-mooney | and yes if you are over allcoated you cannot make new allcoations | |
| 17:52:01 | sean-k-mooney | but i think you are right that you can modify the reserve value | |
| 17:53:04 | sean-k-mooney | like you can go form reservice 0 cpus to 10 and if that would over allocate that is fine it will be resolved when a vm is delete/moved | |
| 17:54:01 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at johnthetubaguy clever solution but form context i assume it invovles setting the reserved value to 1 for the custom resoucs inventory that represnt the baremetal hosts | |
| 18:03:08 | opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/nova master: Nova to honor "cross_az_attach" during server(VM) migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864760 | |
| 22:02:18 | opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/nova master: Nova to honor "cross_az_attach" during server(VM) migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864760 | |
| 23:41:22 | opendevreview | Younghwan Yoo proposed openstack/nova master: Update return value to be a valid UUID https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-11-17 | |||
| 01:57:53 | melwitt | bauzas: this patch looks relevant to your interests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864674 | |
| 05:59:57 | opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Optimize the small pagesize in numa_fit_instance_to_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | |
| 08:04:56 | opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Optimize the small pagesize in numa_fit_instance_to_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | |
| 08:42:46 | opendevreview | Jorhson Deng proposed openstack/nova master: Optimize the small pagesize in numa_fit_instance_to_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864812 | |
| 09:44:05 | johnthetubaguy | When you run functional tests on your dev box, and you get loads of errors due to no valid host, it probably means I am doing something stupid, has anyone else hit that at all please? | |
| 10:09:15 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: which testcases ? | |