Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-11-08
16:09:06 sean-k-mooney proably yes
16:09:29 sean-k-mooney ill be around and hopefully have more time to review next week
16:10:02 bauzas ok, anyone having an issue ?
16:10:07 bauzas for next tuesday
16:10:49 gibi works for me
16:11:02 bauzas ok
16:12:11 bauzas #agreed We will have have a spec review day on Nov 15th, please prepare your specs before this day and make sure you can be around on this day if you have reviews
16:12:43 bauzas #action bauzas to write an openstack-discuss email for this
16:12:59 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:13:36 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:14:07 bauzas as you can see, now we have more review-prio usage from contributors :)
16:14:09 bauzas <3
16:14:21 bauzas so, please, look at those when you review
16:14:36 bauzas #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:14:49 bauzas any question here ?
16:15:19 sean-k-mooney its not qiute what i was suggestign for the usage but ok
16:15:38 sean-k-mooney +1 was commit to review +2 was asking for other cores to also review
16:15:42 sean-k-mooney but either woks
16:16:35 bauzas k
16:17:08 bauzas at least contributors can +1 if they want core reviews for some change they reviewed (not for their own changes of course)
16:18:22 bauzas moving on ?
16:18:31 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:18:40 bauzas elodilles : your time
16:18:47 elodilles #info wallaby transitioned to Extended Maintenance ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862298 )
16:19:21 elodilles and we have released a final wallaby release
16:19:31 elodilles #info stable branches state should be OK (except stein and older)
16:19:41 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:19:47 elodilles and last but not least:
16:20:02 elodilles as said 2 weeks ago: stein, rocky and queens EOL'ing patch was proposed: https://review.opendev.org/862520 + mail was sent to ML https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030980.html
16:20:26 elodilles as I see no mail replies arrived on the thread
16:20:39 elodilles so I propose to continue with the EOL'ing
16:20:49 bauzas yup, agreed
16:20:54 bauzas I just +1d the change
16:21:02 bauzas we agreed on it during the PTG
16:21:02 elodilles bauzas: thanks!
16:21:20 bauzas and given none has concerns by the email, that means we can EOL
16:21:43 bauzas elodilles: I guess you can now remove the -W
16:22:29 elodilles removed it now
16:22:53 bauzas thbanks
16:23:19 bauzas anything else to discuss about the stable branches ?
16:23:27 elodilles nothing from me
16:24:53 bauzas ok, last topic then
16:24:59 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:25:05 bauzas we have an item today
16:25:21 bauzas Kirill_ : vnc console for baremetal. new spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773
16:25:30 bauzas I guess you want reviews ?
16:26:03 Kirill_ hi! yes. also i've emplemented it)
16:27:14 bauzas Kirill_: OK, then no worries, we'll look at your spec at least on next Tuesday
16:27:17 sean-k-mooney so you used to be able to do this in the past
16:27:46 bauzas but if you can discuss about the design, sure, let us knwo
16:27:49 sean-k-mooney with the ipmi driver and vncinabox or something like that
16:27:51 bauzas if you *want
16:28:09 sean-k-mooney shellinabox
16:28:28 sean-k-mooney that was the ironic optional component
16:28:49 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/console.html
16:29:11 sean-k-mooney if you use that you can enabel the console to work in horizong today
16:29:34 Kirill_ i work on idrac servers+adding ilo console
16:29:51 Kirill_ but the main gaul is
16:29:59 Kirill_ new graphical console interface
16:30:33 Kirill_ i also emplemented it. but will create mr after approve of this spec
16:31:09 Kirill_ in my spec i added all links. also link to new graphical console interface approved spec
16:31:10 sean-k-mooney ok i would liek to see some context in the spec why the existing horizon integration which used to work with nova provisiond server no longer works
16:32:02 sean-k-mooney ok the reaons im asking this i si used ot have ironic deployed with the geniric ipmi driver and shellinabox at home a few years ago and it worked fine in horizon
16:32:16 sean-k-mooney useing a difffent ironic driver ideally shoudl not requrie changed to nova
16:32:31 sean-k-mooney so if we add this new feature i would hope it will work for all ironic drivers
16:32:42 Kirill_ for vnc
16:32:50 Kirill_ we need to create a handshake
16:33:02 Kirill_ for this handshake we need a password from ironic
16:33:21 sean-k-mooney oh the old solution used the serial console proxy
16:33:28 sean-k-mooney not the novnc proxy
16:33:32 sean-k-mooney that the delta
16:33:35 sean-k-mooney ok makes sense
16:33:41 Kirill_ we need a graphical console not serial
16:34:05 sean-k-mooney ack ya just was trying to figure out why this is fiddernt then https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/admin/console.html
16:34:21 sean-k-mooney its the grapical console not serial
16:35:02 Kirill_ it is not the same console as vnc
16:36:22 bauzas sean-k-mooney: Kirill_: could you maybe discuss this in the spec then ?
16:36:30 bauzas or after the meeting ?
16:36:31 Kirill_ ++
16:36:35 bauzas I'm about to end the meeting
16:36:45 bauzas so you can continue to discuss in the IRC channel after
16:37:02 bauzas ok, anyone else having an item to discuss ?
16:37:09 Kirill_ just to sum up. on 15th November we will review all specs (and mine too)?)))
16:38:06 bauzas yes
16:38:41 Kirill_ got it, thanks
16:39:30 bauzas ok, then let's close the meeting
16:39:41 bauzas thanks all
16:39:45 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-08-16.00.log.html
16:39:45 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-08-16.00.txt
16:39:45 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-11-08-16.00.html
16:39:45 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Nov 8 16:39:45 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:39:45 bauzas #endmeeting
16:40:57 elodilles thanks bauzas o/
17:12:45 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Test ceph-multistore with a real image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860864
19:05:56 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Adds a repoducer for post live migration fail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863806
19:05:57 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [compute] always set instance.host in post_livemigration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864055
20:08:25 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Adds a repoducer for post live migration fail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863806
20:08:26 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/train: [compute] always set instance.host in post_livemigration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/864055
23:00:12 clarkb Hello nova. I've been testing server rescue behavior recently and run into two different interesting behaviors. The first is when rescuing a non bfv instance if the rootfs label configured in grub and fstab is the same between the rescue image and the instance being recsued you can boot into the rescue image kernel but have the rescued instance / mounted
23:00:57 clarkb This is problematic because if the problem is say in systemd init steps you'd still be broken in the rescued setup. Additionally it may not always be the case that the kernel and your rescued filesystem are compatbile enough to boot

Earlier   Later