| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-10-25 | |||
| 16:09:43 | bauzas | gibi: well, it took me a morning to figure out there was no issue at all | |
| 16:09:49 | bauzas | you can imagine my mindset at noon | |
| 16:10:01 | gibi | a happy mindset that nova is not buggy :D | |
| 16:10:22 | bauzas | but my wife appreciated at lunchtime | |
| 16:10:30 | bauzas | anyway, meeting | |
| 16:10:35 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:44 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) | |
| 16:10:49 | bauzas | #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review | |
| 16:11:05 | bauzas | ^ this is a new disclaimer, as agreed at the PTG | |
| 16:11:20 | bauzas | I started clicking +1 on a few specs | |
| 16:12:30 | bauzas | oh, we miss the specs repo in the gerrit query above ! | |
| 16:13:14 | bauzas | #action bauzas to amend the above gerrit URL to include the specs repo | |
| 16:13:46 | bauzas | interestingly, we have a non-core contributor that used the flag for signaling his interest | |
| 16:13:58 | gibi | \o/ | |
| 16:14:21 | bauzas | gibi: that's on your patches, I won't ask you how much you bribed him :p | |
| 16:14:34 | bauzas | anyway, kidding again | |
| 16:14:37 | sean-k-mooney | the pci ones | |
| 16:14:46 | bauzas | yup | |
| 16:15:02 | bauzas | moving on, I need to leave | |
| 16:15:06 | sean-k-mooney | its proably the person that was asking about that functionality on irc so | |
| 16:15:07 | gibi | I had some private pings during the PTG about the PCI stuff so I let them know where we are and where can they help | |
| 16:15:15 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:15:20 | bauzas | gibi: ah cool to know | |
| 16:15:24 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:15:31 | elodilles | thanks | |
| 16:15:40 | elodilles | so as we discussed at PTG | |
| 16:15:43 | elodilles | #info stein, rocky and queens EOL'ing patch was proposed: https://review.opendev.org/862520 + mail was sent to ML https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030980.html | |
| 16:15:54 | elodilles | and the status: | |
| 16:15:56 | elodilles | #info from stable/zed back till stable/ussuri branches' gates should be OK | |
| 16:15:59 | elodilles | #info stable/train must have been fixed ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-gate/+/860961 ) | |
| 16:16:09 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:16:11 | bauzas | I'm OK with the EOL patch | |
| 16:16:24 | elodilles | bauzas: cool \o/ | |
| 16:16:34 | bauzas | I'll review the hashes but given you probably made it with the tooling in place, I don't expect problems | |
| 16:16:38 | elodilles | let's do the formal waiting and then we can merge it | |
| 16:16:47 | elodilles | and delete those old broken branches :'( | |
| 16:16:48 | bauzas | and then I'll set the PTL-approval | |
| 16:16:59 | elodilles | bauzas: ++ | |
| 16:17:10 | bauzas | elodilles: true, let's wait but I'll still send the signal I'm ok with the deletion | |
| 16:17:19 | bauzas | anything else to mention ? | |
| 16:17:24 | elodilles | nothing from me | |
| 16:17:28 | gibi | elodilles: thanks, that was quick | |
| 16:17:33 | elodilles | ++ | |
| 16:17:39 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:17:44 | bauzas | nothing written | |
| 16:17:50 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:18:19 | bauzas | iirc, some actions were made at the PTG to propose specless blueprints at weekly meetings | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | I don't remember yet which blueprints and who, but we can arrange this later | |
| 16:18:47 | bauzas | oh the neutron thing | |
| 16:18:49 | bauzas | from sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:19:01 | bauzas | whether this was a bugfix or bluepritn | |
| 16:19:11 | bauzas | if you don't mind, let's punt this for next week | |
| 16:19:35 | bauzas | I don't hear screams | |
| 16:19:39 | bauzas | eventually... | |
| 16:19:44 | bauzas | thanks all, | |
| 16:19:47 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-10-25-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:19:47 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-10-25-16.00.txt | |
| 16:19:47 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-10-25-16.00.html | |
| 16:19:47 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Oct 25 16:19:47 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:19:47 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:19:49 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:19:54 | gibi | bauzas: thanks, have a nice meetup | |
| 16:19:55 | bauzas | this was as quick as I could | |
| 16:20:03 | bauzas | gibi: python horrow show | |
| 16:20:16 | elodilles | (bauzas: i did the EOL'ing with release tools, yes ;)) | |
| 16:20:16 | bauzas | that's the name of the meetup, I'm scared in advance | |
| 16:20:32 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:20:53 | gibi | bauzas: will they talk about nova there? ;) | |
| 16:32:02 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add spec for fqdn in hostname https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/862626 | |
| 16:32:45 | sean-k-mooney | artom: ^ there you go | |
| 17:00:27 | artom | sean-k-mooney, cheers! | |
| 17:00:40 | artom | dansmith, ^^ I'm bringing it to your attention now as early as possible :) | |
| 17:21:26 | dansmith | but it's not 0.9*cycle_length yet! | |
| 18:52:17 | artom | dansmith, I know, I'm capable of rudimentary learning and self-improvement! | |
| 18:52:34 | artom | I'm as flabbergasted at the concept as you are ;) | |
| #openstack-nova - 2022-10-26 | |||
| 08:07:20 | sahid | o/ technical detail regarding the new behavior for evacuate, wondering what kind of parameter for the API, any idea? | |
| 08:07:44 | sahid | s//what kind of parameter should I use | |
| 08:08:28 | sahid | currently I'm passing target_state={active|stop}, but I'm not sure if that sound right now | |
| 08:09:22 | sahid | even if I force it to stop for the new microversion | |
| 08:10:19 | sahid | perhaps, target_behavior={old, stop} | |
| 08:10:41 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: ^ in case that you have something in head | |
| 08:11:46 | sahid | or I can just keep target_state with {None, stop}, where None will be the old behavior and stop the new behavior, stop will be forced for new API | |
| 12:18:02 | sean-k-mooney | sahid: well with the old microverion you shoudl not pass target_state at all at the rpc layer it will default ot none | |
| 12:18:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Handle zero pinned CPU in a cell with mixed policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862687 | |
| 12:18:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce asym NUMA mixed CPU policy bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/862686 | |
| 12:18:52 | sean-k-mooney | and then for the new microverion you can pass the flag it can be target_state="stop" | |
| 12:19:19 | sean-k-mooney | you shoudl not need to ever pass started or old | |
| 12:44:46 | sahid | sean-k-mooney: i see, so basically i kept the actual impl but update the REST API part + ofcourse some tests on compute API part | |
| 12:44:55 | sahid | s/kept/keep | |
| 12:44:59 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 12:45:06 | sahid | let's make a try, thanks | |
| 12:45:14 | sean-k-mooney | 99% of what you have should not need to be changed | |
| 12:45:20 | sahid | ++ | |
| 13:47:47 | frickler | not sure if everyone is subscribed, discussion about the storyboard issue is now happening here https://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-discuss/2022-October/000370.html , sean-k-mooney has already given a good summary of UX issues | |
| 14:04:56 | sean-k-mooney | hopefully that wont derail things too much | |
| 14:06:41 | sean-k-mooney | frickler: while that discussion is happening im more then happy to hold of doing anything with placment ectra | |
| 14:07:53 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-cpu-hotplug this is not hotplug | |
| 14:08:08 | sean-k-mooney | please do not use that terminology anywhere near this | |
| 14:08:15 | sean-k-mooney | even at teh kernel level that is incorrect | |
| 14:08:25 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: well, https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/cpu_hotplug.html seems the correct term | |