Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-14
13:40:56 sean-k-mooney *those
13:46:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif master: Update master for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856782
13:50:07 Uggla question about my_block_storage_ip. This flag can be available on each compute nodes or the default is the compute ip. Am I right ?
13:50:37 sean-k-mooney yes
13:51:49 Uggla is there a way to get this parameter from the api or it can be only provided by the compute node itself ?
13:52:00 sean-k-mooney only on the compute
13:52:15 sean-k-mooney that is why you need to do the grant on the compute not the api
13:52:21 sean-k-mooney or conductor
13:52:49 sean-k-mooney it has to be done in the compute agent
13:53:28 Uggla so it needs a new "entry" in the compute API for this. Correct ?
13:54:19 sean-k-mooney for share attament yes you need that anyway
13:55:02 sean-k-mooney this is an internal detail or the attach_share rpc call
13:56:05 Uggla so far there is no rpc call for attach. As everything could be done in the API.
13:56:34 sean-k-mooney that would never work
13:56:49 sean-k-mooney we need a call to the compute to actully do the mounting of the share ectra
13:57:14 sean-k-mooney were you jsut goign to put that into spawn or something?
13:57:32 Uggla attach is just an entry within the db. And mount + real work is done at power_on
13:57:35 sean-k-mooney i have not look at this in a while so i dont remember the details
13:58:03 sean-k-mooney i guess that work today only because we require the vm to be off/shelved
13:58:23 sean-k-mooney but the rpc would be required if we supprot live attach in the future
13:58:24 Uggla yes off
13:58:45 sean-k-mooney ya so unless yo defer the grant to the power on stage
13:58:56 sean-k-mooney your going to need an attach_share rpc call
13:59:09 sean-k-mooney however hard reboot should not really call any external services
13:59:26 sean-k-mooney like it should not udpate cinder attachment or neutron prot bindings
13:59:38 sean-k-mooney so i woudl find it odd for it to update manila grants
14:00:07 Uggla ok I can implement that in rpc. Can I just make a sync call to rpc get the result and do the rest in the API ?
14:00:19 Uggla result = get the ip
14:00:45 Uggla or is it better to call the rpc and do the required work in the rpc ?
14:04:30 gibi bauzas: I left feedback on the prelude
14:04:43 bauzas ack, looing
14:06:26 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: the release note will be moved to zed when the tag is created
14:06:43 stephenfin (sorry, my VPN disconnected and I never noticed)
14:07:03 stephenfin (my ZNC deployment is now behind VPN)
14:09:24 sean-k-mooney no worries
14:10:45 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Prelude section for Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857467
14:10:50 bauzas gibi: sean-k-mooney: updated ^
14:11:04 bauzas stephenfin: well, not automatically
14:11:23 stephenfin wdym?
14:11:24 bauzas stephenfin: we need to tell reno to look at the new stable/zed branch
14:11:25 gibi bauzas: that was fast :)
14:12:06 bauzas stephenfin: I mean, by for example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833243
14:12:30 stephenfin bauzas: oh yeah, but the bot will do that
14:12:31 bauzas stephenfin: if we don't merge this file, then none of the files look at the new stable branch
14:12:41 sean-k-mooney bauzas: that also has the pbr tag in the commit
14:12:41 stephenfin you're right though
14:12:50 bauzas so we need to merge it quickly after the new branch
14:13:18 stephenfin it'll appear under the 26.0.0 tag but the zed page won't exist until created
15:18:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif master: Switch to 2023.1 Python3 unit tests and generic template name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856783
15:36:44 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Switch to 2023.1 Python3 unit tests and generic template name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/856791
15:46:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Bump min oslo.concurrencty to >= 5.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857491
16:50:20 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Update compute rpc version alias for zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/855706
17:13:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Prelude section for Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857467
17:29:22 nicolasbock The server's port will get a dns_assignment with the generic domain from neutron.conf in the fqdn instead of the dns domain from the network. This breaks reverse DNS lookups from the VM.
17:29:22 nicolasbock 3. Created server on network
17:29:22 nicolasbock 2. Created zone
17:29:22 nicolasbock 1. Created network with dns_domain
17:29:22 nicolasbock Hi! I am trying to get Neutron/Designate integration to work and am running into the following issue:
17:29:23 nicolasbock Am I missing something?
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-15
09:13:48 opendevreview Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova-specs master: spec: allowing target state for evacuate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838
10:13:57 auniyal__ Hello
10:14:08 auniyal__ I need to test this function https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/commit/b8c62f2055de1079657e13aacf34d691d954f305/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L3238
10:14:21 auniyal__ so I added below, in integrated helpers https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/tests/functional/integrated_helpers.py#L626
10:14:32 auniyal__ server['id'], {'createImage': {'name': snapshot_name}})
10:14:32 auniyal__ admin_api.post_server_action(
10:14:32 auniyal__ admin_api = getattr(self, 'admin_api', self.api)
10:14:32 auniyal__ def _create_snapshot(self, server, snapshot_name):
10:14:42 auniyal__ self._create_snapshot(server, "snapshot-1")
10:14:42 auniyal__ then called like this from my test
10:15:21 auniyal__ but control never seems go in the target function
10:58:10 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/os-vif master: Move mtu update request into ovsdb transaction https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/857868
13:14:46 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/nova stable/train: Revert "Revert resize: wait for events according to hybrid plug" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/857877
13:52:48 bauzas elodilles: gibi: sean-k-mooney: seems everything is in good shape for RC1
13:52:55 bauzas any concerns before we branch ?
13:53:14 bauzas context : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-rc-potential
13:53:36 bauzas elodilles: we'll need to wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895 to be merged tho
14:06:07 gibi bauzas: I have nothing else for Zed. as soon as ^^ merges we can branch
14:23:24 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i have been meing to get back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/856173
14:23:44 sean-k-mooney ill try and spot check that today to make sure everythin that is done is updated
14:23:50 bauzas cool
14:23:53 sean-k-mooney but i think we are good to go for zed too
14:23:59 bauzas we don't branch the specs repo
14:24:00 elodilles bauzas: \o/
14:24:01 sean-k-mooney bar the min bump
14:24:08 sean-k-mooney correct we dont
14:24:19 sean-k-mooney its just in the needed for rc section
14:24:35 elodilles bauzas: one more question
14:24:45 bauzas elodilles: I'll ping you when the min version bump will be merged
14:25:07 elodilles bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857153
14:25:17 elodilles bauzas: what about placement? ^^^
14:25:32 bauzas elodilles: should be good too
14:25:40 elodilles bauzas: ack
14:25:43 elodilles thanks!
14:25:44 bauzas for 20 mins
14:27:02 elodilles sean-k-mooney: you can also PTL-approved+1 the placement patch as release liaison o:)
14:28:40 sean-k-mooney sure i can do it i bauzas absece ill review it now quickly
14:29:18 sean-k-mooney for placment in partiacl i dont htink we had anything pendign but for nova we need to waith for the min oslo concurence bump to merge
14:32:35 elodilles sean-k-mooney: yepp, for nova we still wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895
14:33:49 elodilles sean-k-mooney: but according to bauzas placement should be OK, so if you have time to double-check & review it would be aweseome :)
14:50:41 bauzas elodilles: gave PTL+1

Earlier   Later