Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-09-13
16:46:27 bauzas for the moment, we say Xena
16:46:29 elodilles (and waiting for a response on the placement patch :))
16:46:39 bauzas in https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/objects/service.py#L233
16:46:44 sean-k-mooney yep it should by Yoga
16:46:46 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/resolutions/20220210-release-cadence-adjustment.rst#proposed-solution
16:47:01 sean-k-mooney """Y->A should be a "dress rehearsal" where we have the jobs enabled to help smoke out any issues, but where hard guarantees are not yet made."""
16:47:19 bauzas sean-k-mooney: takashi made a patch accordingly
16:47:46 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895
16:47:46 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856780
16:48:16 bauzas sean-k-mooney: agreed on the resolution so we then need to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/856895 before RC1
16:48:45 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I personally feel the rpc alias and the min version bump shall continue to be separate patches
16:48:54 bauzas so I'll +2 boht
16:49:06 sean-k-mooney ok
16:49:15 sean-k-mooney if they are both merged for rc then im ok with that
16:49:37 sean-k-mooney i should drop my -1 then on the other patch
16:50:07 sean-k-mooney i would prefer to do these together in general but either works
16:50:25 bauzas sean-k-mooney: previously we kept them separately
16:50:35 gibi I have to review those
16:50:54 sean-k-mooney i set review priorty on both
16:51:00 bauzas as ideally, rpc aliases should be merged just before RC1 while min version bumps shall be merged at the beginning of the release
16:51:05 sean-k-mooney ill look at them agin later and droped my -1
16:51:29 sean-k-mooney im not convice thats the case
16:51:42 sean-k-mooney or that they need to be seperate
16:52:04 bauzas I'll update the PTL guide to reflect this
16:52:13 bauzas and sean-k-mooney, you're up to debate in such patch
16:52:23 sean-k-mooney we had some discussion about if we shoudl be recording the min or max verison supproted by a release by the way
16:52:25 bauzas (in the PTL guide patch, I mean)
16:52:36 bauzas moving on
16:52:47 bauzas #topic PTG planning
16:52:51 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-ptg Antelope PTG etherpad
16:52:53 bauzas as a reminder ^
16:52:58 bauzas #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html PTG schedule
16:53:03 bauzas I made the bookings as agreed ^
16:53:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/856781
16:53:22 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:53:27 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:53:45 bauzas nothing to say about those
16:54:00 bauzas feel free to engage on review-prio patches during the day
16:54:06 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:54:09 sean-k-mooney we should add rc bugs to the review priortes
16:54:15 bauzas elodilles: your 5-min turn
16:54:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I can do it
16:54:25 elodilles ack
16:54:32 elodilles #info stable/yoga seems to be blocked by openstacksdk-functional-devstack job
16:54:48 elodilles the py39 issue was resolved,
16:55:05 elodilles but it seems openstacksdk-functional-devstack fails now instead :/
16:55:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/856788
16:55:15 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/856789
16:55:22 bauzas damn
16:55:22 elodilles JayF called our attention yesterday about it
16:55:44 elodilles i had only a quick look and it fails on other projects gate as well, so it is not just nova
16:55:53 elodilles beyond this
16:55:56 elodilles #info stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously
16:56:03 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:56:12 elodilles the usual things ^^^
16:56:16 elodilles that's it
16:56:39 bauzas elodilles: fancy writing an email to the world explaining the gate blocker ?
16:56:53 elodilles bauzas: yepp, i can do that
16:57:03 bauzas I just hope someone will just magically wake up and say he'll look
16:57:27 bauzas elodilles: all projects being impacted by the sdk, you said ?
16:57:42 elodilles not all
16:57:49 elodilles but i've seen some others
16:57:51 sean-k-mooney is that the storage cleanpu failure
16:57:57 sean-k-mooney in the functional job
16:58:03 sean-k-mooney where its failing to delete the volume
16:58:09 sean-k-mooney becuase the snapshot is not deleted
16:58:29 sean-k-mooney ah it is test_block_storage_cleanup
16:58:30 elodilles yepp, test_block_storage_cleanup
16:58:42 sean-k-mooney ya so they trided to fix it by doing it in a loop twice
16:58:55 sean-k-mooney but that obviouly does not work
16:59:08 sean-k-mooney so the test is flaky
16:59:14 elodilles oh, so it's a known issue :-o
16:59:18 bauzas => remove the flakey test then
16:59:27 sean-k-mooney ill see if i can get the patch
16:59:32 bauzas and unblock the gate
16:59:44 sean-k-mooney we cant currently filter those
16:59:48 sean-k-mooney via the job config
17:00:25 bauzas anyway, we're on time
17:00:36 sean-k-mooney efoley and i https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856509 tried to fix it by backporting that
17:00:47 sean-k-mooney but then we realised it always uses master
17:00:49 bauzas let's wrap this meeting and continue the stable/yoga discussion right after if you want
17:00:59 bauzas #topic Open discussion
17:01:01 bauzas nothing
17:01:02 sean-k-mooney so https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/852992 was ment to fix it but does not
17:01:14 JayF Might be worth noting for meeting notes purposes that folks running Ironic back as far as train should update their Nova checkout
17:01:22 JayF as all known fixes for the Ironic driver have been backported
17:01:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/856784
17:01:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/856785
17:01:45 JayF (and I know for em branches we don't do releases)
17:01:58 bauzas JayF: want me to offically set an #info ?
17:01:59 bauzas :)
17:02:08 JayF bauzas: if you think anyone who cares would read it :D
17:02:29 sean-k-mooney elodilles: i just opened a revert https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857471
17:02:52 sean-k-mooney the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/852992 fixes an issue and intoduces the flaky test
17:02:58 sean-k-mooney so maybe a partial revert
17:03:11 sean-k-mooney keep the fix but revert the new test caes
17:03:15 bauzas #info Ironic operators running train or later are more than welcome to upgrade their nova checkout with latest stable releases since bugfixes are released now
17:03:24 bauzas JayF: ^ happy ? :)
17:03:28 JayF thank you :D
17:03:31 elodilles sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks for the info! i'll look at them then

Earlier   Later